Further Applications

  • Rudolf Avenhaus


In the preceding chapter we tried to demonstrate the application of the two principles of material accountancy and data verification to international nuclear material safeguards. In this final chapter we discuss further areas; however, it is not our intention to collect all applications of these principles in industry and economics. Such an attempt has been made earlier(1) and will not be repeated here. Instead, we shall demonstrate, with the help of selected major problem areas, in what way these principles are used again for some safeguards purpose.


Reduction Area Insurance Contract Military Force Preceding Chapter Verification Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Avenhaus, Material Accountability—Theory, Verification, Applications, Monograph No. 2 of the International IIASA Wiley Series on Applied Systems Analysis, Wiley, Chichester (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Verification: The Critical Element of Arms Control, ACDA Publication No. 85, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1976).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Arkin, Handbook of Sampling for Auditing and Accounting, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York (1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. A. Arens and J. K. Loebecke, Auditing: An Integral Approach, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. S. Kaplan, Statistical Sampling in Auditing with Auxiliary Information Estimates, J. Accounting Res. 11(2), 238–258 (Autumn 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. E. Cushing, Decision Theoretic Estimation Methods in Accounting and Auditing, Symposium on Auditing Research IV by an Audit Group at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Accountancy, pp. 3-52, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. G. Cochran, Sampling Techniques, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York (1963).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Eliott and J. Rogers, Relating Statistical Sampling to Audit Objectives, J. Accountancy, 134(1), 46–55 (July 1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. R. Kinney Jr., A Decision Theory Approach to the Sampling Problem in Auditing, J. Accounting Res. 13(1), 117–132 (Spring 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. R. Kinney Jr. and C. S. Warren, The Decision-Theory Approach to Audit Sampling: An Extension and Application to Receivables Confirmations, J. Accounting Res. 17(1), 275–285 (Spring 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. L. Duke, J. Neter, and P. A. Leitch, Power Characteristics of Test Statistics in the Auditing Environment: An Empirical Study, J. Accounting Res. 20(1), 42–47 (Spring 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. M. Cyert and H. J. Davidson, Statistical Sampling for Accounting Information, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1962).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. R. Johnson, R. A. Leitch, and J. Neter, Characteristics of Errors in Accounts Receivable and Inventory Audits, Accounting Rev. LVI(2), 270–293 (April 1981).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. P. Smith, Values of Items in Clearing Differences, Oper. Res. Verfahren (FRG) 46, 497–508 (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. V. Sukhatme and B. V. Sukhatme, Sampling Theory of Surveys with Applications, IOWA State University Press, Ames, Iowa (1970).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. J. Garstka, Models for Computing Upper Error Limits in Dollar Unit Sampling, J. Accounting Res. 15(2), 179–192 (Autumn 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Klages, Spieltheorie und Wirtschaftsprüfung (Game Theory and Auditing), Papers of the Europa-Kolleg, Hamburg, Vol. 6, Ludwig Appel Verlag, Hamburg (1968).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Borch, Versicherung und Spieltheorie (Insurance and Game Theory), in Gegenwartsfragen der Versicherung, Versicherungstudien, Heft 5-6, 5-6, Berlin (1962).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Borch, Insuring and Auditing the Auditor, in Games, Economic Dynamics, Time Series Analysis, M. Deistler, E. Fürst, and G. Schwödiauer (Eds.), Physica-Verlag, Wien-Würzburg (1982).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. V. Kneese, R. U. Ayres, and R. C. d’Arge, Economics and the Environment, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (1970).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    O. G. Herfindahl and A. V. Kneese, An Introduction to the Economic Theory of Resources and Environment, Merrill, Columbus, Ohio (1974).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. V. Kneese and B. T. Bower, Environmental Quality and Residuals Management, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (1979).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. J. Vaughan and C. S. Russell, Monitoring Point Sources of Pollution: Answers and More Questions from Statistical Quality Control, Am. Statistician 37(4), 476–487 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. L. Goel and S. M. Wu, Economically Optimum Design of CUSUM Charts, Manage. Sci. 19, 1271–1281 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. B. Wetherill, Sampling Inspection and Quality Control, 2nd Edition, Chapman and Hall, London (1977).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Duncan Jr., The Economic Design of X-Charts Used to Maintain Current Control of a Process, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 51, 228–242 (1956).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Weise, Modell zur Kontrolle des Mengenflusses von umweltrelevanten Stoffen am Beispiel des Elementes Quecksilber (Model for the Control of the Mass Flow of Environmentally Relevant Materials Based on the Mercury Example), Wasser, Luft, Betrieb (FRG) 16(11), 1–2 (1972).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ministry of the Interior of the Federal Republic of Germany (Ed.) Was Sie schon immer über Umweltschutz wissen wollten (What you always wanted to know about environmental protection), Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart (1981).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Rauhut and D. Balzer, Verbrauch und Verbleib von Cadmium in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Jahr 1973 (Consumption and Final Disposal of Cadmium in the Federal Republic of Germany in 1973), Metall (FRG) 30(3), 269–272 (1976).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Rauhut, Verbrauch und Verbleib von Cadmium in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Jahr 1974 und 1975 (Consumption and Final Disposal of Cadmium in the Federal Republic of Germany in 1974 and 1975), Metall (FRG) 32(9), 948–949 (1978).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. Rauhut, Cadmium-Bilanz 1976/77 und Cadmiumverbrauch bis 1979 (Cadmium balance 1976/77 and Cadmium Consumption until 1979), Metall (FRG) 35(4), 344–347 (1981).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. R. Meetham, Natural Removal of Pollution from the Atmosphere, Q.J.R. Met. Soc. 76, 359–371 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. A. Garland and J. P. Branson, The Mixing Height and Mass Balance of SO2 in the Atmosphere above Great Britain, Atmospheric Environment 10, 353–362 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Warren Spring Laboratory, The National Survey of Air Pollution 1961–1971, HMSO, London (1973).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    C. M. Stevenson, An Analysis of the Chemical Composition of Rain Water and Air over British Isles and Eire for the Years 1959–1964, Q.J.R. Met. Soc. 94, 56–78 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. E. Lee, J. Caldwell, G. G. Akland, and R. Frankhouse, The Distribution and Transport of Airborne Particulate Matter and Inorganic Components in Great Britain, Atmos. Environ. 8, 1095–1109 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. J. Heard and R. D. Wiffen, Electron Microscopy of Natural Aerosols and the Identification of Particulate Ammonium Sulphate, Atmos. Environ. 3, 337–340 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. C. Chamberlain, Transport of Lycopodium Spores and Other Small Particles through Surfaces, Proc. R. Soc. London A296, 45–70 (1966).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    G. Preuschen, Über die Lebensbedrohung der Menschheit durch die Veränderung des Sauerstoff-Kohlensäure-Verhältnisses der Atmosphäre (On the Threat to Human Life Caused by the Change of the Oxygen-Carbon Ratio in the Atmosphere), Paper presented at the Internationale Lebensschutztagung, Wiesbaden, (December 1970).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Man’s Impact on the Global Environment, Report of the Study of Critical Environmental Problems (SCEP), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1972).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    W. Stumm (Ed.), Global Chemical Cycles and Their Alterations by Man, Abakon Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin (1977).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. Williams (Ed.), Carbon Dioxide, Climate and Society, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1978).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    B. Bolin, E. T. Degens, S. Kempe, and P. Ketner (Eds.), The Global Carbon Cycle SCOPE 13, Wiley, Chichester (1979).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    W. M. Matthews, W. W. Kellogg, and G. D. Robinson (Eds.), Man’s Impact on the Climate, pp. 447ff, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1971).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    H. Oeschger, U. Siegenthaler, U. Schotterer, and A. Gugelmann, A Box Diffusion Model to Study Carbon Dioxide Exchange in Nature, Tellus 27, 168–172 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    J. Sawyer, Man-Made Carbon Dioxide and the Greenhouse Effect, Nature 239, 23–26 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    L. Machta, The Role of the Oceans and Biosphere in the Carbon Dioxide Cycle, Proceedings of the 20th Nobel Symposium, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm (1971).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    J. Wei, C. Prater, Advances in Catalysis, Vol. XIII, Academic Press, New York (1962).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. Fenyi and H. Frick, Mathematical Treatment of First Order Kinetic Systems with Respect to the Carbon Dioxide Cycle of the Earth, Report KFK 2621 of the Nuclear Research Center Karlsruhe (1978).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    R. Avenhaus, S. Fenyi, and H. Frick, Box Models for the CO2 Cycle of the Earth, Environ. Int. 2(4–6), 379–385 (1980).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    K. Zimen, P. Offermann, and G. Hartmann, Source Functions of CO2 and Future CO2 Burden in the Atmosphere, Z. Naturforsch. 32a, 1544–1554 (1977).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), Verification: The Critical Element of Arms Control, ACDA Publication No. 85, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1976).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Arms Control Today, Vols. 1ff, Arms Control Association, Washington, D.C. (1971ff).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), Repertory of Disarmament Research, Palais des Nation, Geneva (1982).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mathematica Inc., The Application of Statistical Methodology to Arms Control and Disarmament, Submitted to the U.S. ACDA under Contract No. ACDA/ST-37, Princeton, New Jersey (1965).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mathematica Inc., The Application of Statistical Methodology to Arms Control and Disarmament. Submitted to the U.S. ACDA under Contract No. ACDA/ST-3. Princeton, New Jersey (1963).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (Eds), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control, Plenum Press, New York (1984).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    M. Maschler, A Non-Zero Sum Game Related to a Test Ban Treaty, in ACDA/St-3, see Ref. 56 (1963).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    T. L. Saaty, A Model for the Control of Arms, Oper. Res. 12(4), 586–609 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    R. Avenhaus, J. Fichtner, and R. K. Huber, Conventional Force Equilibria and Crisis Stability—Some Arms Control Implications of Analytical Combat Models, Proceedings of the IFAC Workshop on Supplemental Ways for Improving International Stability, Laxenburg, Austria, 13–15 September 1983, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 205–212 (1984).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    R. L. Fisher, Defending the Central Front, Adelphi Paper 127, International Institute for Strategic Studies, London (1976).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    T. L. Saaty, Impact of Disarmament Nuclear Package Reductions, in Ref. 57, pp. 309–334 (1984).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    R. K. Huber, Die Systemanalyse in der Verteidigungsplanung. Eine Kritik und ein Vorschlag aus systemanalytischer Sicht (Systems analysis in defence planning. A critique and a proposal from a systems analytical point of view), Wehrwissenschaftliche Rundschau 5, 133–143 (1980).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    (Without author’s name), Description of Record and Material Flow in a Simple Factory, in ACDA/ST-37, see Ref. 55 (1965).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    F. J. Anscombe and M. D. Davis, Inspection Against Clandestine Rearmament, ACDA/ST-3, see Ref. 56, pp. 69-166 (1963).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    D. A. V. Fischer, Safeguards—a Model for General Arms Control? IAEA Bull 24(2), 45–49 (1982).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    A. Crawford, F. R. Cleminson, D. A. Grant, and E. Gilman, Compendium of Arms Control Verification Proposals (Second Edition), ORAE-Report No. R81, Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Canada (1982).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    W. Häfele, Verifikationssysteme bei einer ausgewogenen Verminderung von Streitkräften in Mitteleuropa (Verification systems for a balanced force reduction in Central Europe), Europa Arch. 6, 189–200 (1980).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    R. Wittekindt, Verification of MBFR-Agreements—A Systems Analysis, in Ref. 57, pp. 383-412 (1984).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Inspection and Observation of Retained Levels of Ground Forces and General Purpose Air Forces in a Specific Area, Summary Report prepared by Field Operations Division, Weapons Evaluation and Control Bureau, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Washington, D.C. (1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rudolf Avenhaus
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Armed Forces University MunichNeubibergFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations