Semi-Markov processes in seismic risk analysis

  • E. Grandori Guagenti
  • C. Molina


Even though the Poisson process has been widely used in the modelling of earthquake occurrences, it is well known that the temporal sequence of earthquakes in a given zone is not a sequence of independent events. In general the sequence has to be assumed to be a process with a memory of past events or, at least, non stationary.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anagnos, T., A.S. Kiremidjian (1984). Stochastic slip predictable model, for earthquake occurrence, BSSA.Google Scholar
  2. Esteva, L. (1982). Models for uncertainly and decision making for seismic risk conditions. National University of Mexico.Google Scholar
  3. Grandori, G., E. Guagenti, V. Petrini (1984). On the use of renewal processes in the seismic hazard analysis. Proc. 8 WCEE, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. Guagenti, G.E. (1979). Stochastic processes in the modelling of earthquake occurrence. In “Numerical techniques for Stochastic Systems”, Archetti F. and M. Cugiani Eds, North Holland, 205-216.Google Scholar
  5. Guagenti, G.E. (1982). Stochastic processes in seismic risk reduction. Rend.Sem.Mat.e Fis. di Milano.Google Scholar
  6. Guagenti, G.E., G. Grandori (1983). Some probabilistic aspects of earthquake prediction. Meccanica, no 4.Google Scholar
  7. Guagenti, G.E., G. Grandori, V. Petrini (1979). A discussion of “nonlinear” magnitude-frequency laws. Proceedings of the 2nd U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Standford University.Google Scholar
  8. Guagenti, G.E., C. Molina (1981). Synamic semi-Markov systems in earthquake engineering. Rend.Sem.Mat. Torino.Google Scholar
  9. Hasofer, A.M. (1974). Design for infrequent overloads. Eart.Eng. and Struct.Dyn., vol 2, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howard, R.A. (1971). Dynamic probabilistic systems. J. Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Lomnitz, A.J., C. Lomnitz (1978). A new magnitudes-frequency relation. Tectonophysics, 49, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Patwardhan, A.S., R.B. Kulkarni, S. Tocher (1980). A semi-Markov model for characterizing recurrence of great earthquake. BSSA, V.70, no 1, 323–347.Google Scholar
  13. Shimazaki, K., T. Nakata (1980). Time predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes. Geoph.Res.Lett., vol.7, 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shlien, S., M.N. Toksoz (1970). A clustering model for earthquake occurrence. Bull.Seismol.Soc.Am., 60, 1765–1787.Google Scholar
  15. Veneziano, D., A. Cornell (1974). Earthquake model with spatial and temporal memory for engineering seismic risk. R 74-18, Structures Publ., N 385, Dept. Civil Eng., MIT.Google Scholar
  16. Vere-Jones, D., Y. Ozaki (1982). Some examples of statistical estimation applied to earthquake data. Ann.Inst.Statist.Math., V, 34, Part.B, 189-207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Grandori Guagenti
    • 1
  • C. Molina
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria StrutturalePolitecnico di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations