Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environment, Development, and Public Policy ((EDPE))

  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

Compliance has no one definition. Noncompliance has no one explanation. A farmer or small businessperson sees noncompliance as a response to unfair regulations promulgated by bureaucrats who do not possess adequate knowledge of the private sector. Legal counsel to an environmental agency concludes that the pollution problem would be solved if government more efficiently ai;d aggressively enforced major regulatory laws. The vice-president for environmental affairs of a large corporation, a resident of a community that has been polluted by a neighboring industry, the technical consultant to a legal suit involving unacceptable disposal techniques all have different views of the compliance problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stone (1975, at 228) states that his recommendations involve “more widespread invasion of corporate managerial autonomy than anything ever tried in this country.”

    Google Scholar 

  2. 10 CFR 61. Another important example is the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, P.L. No. 98–616, 96 Stat. 3221.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 42 U.S.C. § 7401–7642.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Inside EPA, Apr. 8, 1983, at p. 6. See also 50 Fed. Reg. 46504 (Nov. 8, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Inside EPA, Sept. 17, 1982,’ at p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See the Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1979, 15 U.S.C. 58 and Executive Order 12291, Feb. 17, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Inside EPA, Jan. 6, 1984, at p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Inside EPA, Nov. 26, 1982, at p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Inside EPA, July 24, 1981, at p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Board of Directors in 1985 consisted of Archibald Cox, Carl M. Loeb, a professor in the Harvard Law School; William Baker, Chairman Emeritus, Bell Laboratories; Donald Kennedy, President, Stanford University, and formerly administrator of the United States Food and Drug Administration; and Charles Powers, President, Clean Sites, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Consensus Workshop on Formaldehyde, Little Rock Arkansas, Oct. 2–6, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Environmental Mediation Hits Snag,” Chemical and Engineering News 15 (Oct. 15, 1984) at 15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. DiMento, Joseph, Lambert, William, Suarez-Villa, Luis, and Tripodes, James. “Siting of Low Level Radioactive Waste Facilities,” Journal of Environmental Systems 15, 1 (1985–86), at 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I am indebted to Gilbert Geis for this latter point.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 5 U.S.C. §§ 551–559; 701–706; 3105; 3344; 5362; 7521 (1967). For a rather complete analysis of the practices required in agency reaction to new information on the record see Ethyl Corporation v. EPA, 541 F.2d 1(1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Advisory Council on Executive Organization headed by Roy L. Ash, “President’s Advisory Council on Executive Organization,” Presidential Doc. (Feb. 8, 1971), at 174, cited in Glen O. Robinson, “On Reorganizing the Independent Regulatory Agencies,” Virginia Law Review, 57 (1971), at 947–995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reed, P., “The Environmental Protection Act of 1983—Is an Environmental Protection Commission Necessary?” Environmental Law Reporter, 13 (Mar., 1983) at 10064–10065.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The reform has already been introduced in Congress. See H.R. 2362, 98th Cong., 1st Sess. (Scheuer), Mar. 23, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Los Angeles Times, Feb. 5, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See also Representative Albert Gore’s hearings on EPA, Sept., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Interview, Mar. 1, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Chap. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Appendix for complete citation.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Note (Winter, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Interview K.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Judge Sidney Feinberg, Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Remarks at Environmental Law Institute ALI-ABA Conference on Environmental Law, San Francisco, California, Feb., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 15 U.S.C. § 57a(h)1 (West Supp. 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seventeen states allow for the initiative in their constitutions. Council of State Governments, The Book of States (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Institute for Governmental Studies, California Data Brief, “Propositions: The Initiative In Perspective,” University of California, Berkeley (Apr., 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  30. California Coastal Zone Conservation Act, 18 Cal Pub. Resources Code §§ 27000 et seq. It became effective Nov. 8, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401–7642, 7604; 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251–1376, 1365.

    Google Scholar 

  32. An example is MEPA. See Chap. 3, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Compare Sax and DiMento (1974) and Haynes (1976) and Bryden (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DiMento, J.F. (1986). Making Environmental Law Work. In: Environmental Law and American Business. Environment, Development, and Public Policy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0565-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0565-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0567-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0565-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics