Skip to main content

Abstract

When school-aged children are referred to the clinician for diagnosis, it is helpful to assess educational achievement since often academic problems are associated with a broad range of behavioral dysfunction.1 Assessing performance in school subject areas is also important in monitoring a child’s learning progress as well as in preparing school programs or interventions. Achievement tests attempt to measure the effects of a relatively standardized set of academic experiences such as that obtained in the public school system. This is in contrast to readiness tests, for example, the Metropolitan Readiness Tests, which try to predict how well prepared a child might be for school.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Erickson MT: Psychological assessment methods, in Gabel S, Erickson MT (eds): Child Development and Developmental Disabilities. Boston, Little, Brown, & Company, 1980, p 209.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hildreth GH, Griffiths, NL: Metropolitan Readiness Tests. Tarrytown-on-Hudson, NY, World Book, 1949–1950.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kirk SA, McCarthy, JJ, Kirk WD: The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Osgood CE: Motivational dynamics of language behavior, in Jones, MR (ed): Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1957, p 348.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salvia J, Ysseldyke JE: Assessment in Special and Remedial Education. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson SW, Morasky RL: Learning Disabilities. Boston, Allyn & Bacon Inc, p 107.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paraskevopoulos JN, Kirk SA: The Development and Psychometric Characteristics of the Revised Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sattler JM: Assessment of Children’s Intelligence and Special Abilities, ed 2. Boston, Allyn & Bacon Inc., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dunn LC, Markwardt FC: Peabody Individual Achievement Test Manual. Circle Pines, MN, American Guidance Service, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Woodcock RW: Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery: Technical Report. Boston, Teaching Resources, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. French JL: Review of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test, in Buros OK (ed): The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ, Gryphon Press, 1972, p 34.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jastak JF, Jastak S: The Wide Range Achievement Test (rev ed). Wilmington, Del, Jastak Associates, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helton GB, Workman EA, Matuszek PA: Psychoeducational Assessment: Integrating Concepts and Techniques. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bender L: A Visual Motor Gestalt Test and Its Clinical Use. New York, American Orthopsychiatric Association, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer JO: The Psychological Assessment of Children. New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1970, p 212.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hutt, M: The Hutt Adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt Test, ed 3. New York, Grune & Stratton Inc, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Golden CJ: Clinical Interpretations of Objective Psychological Tests. New York, Grune & Stratton Inc, 1979, p 132.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koppitz E: The Bender-Gestalt Test for Young Children. New York, Grune & Stratton Inc, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koppitz E: The Bender-Gestalt Test for Young Children, Vol 2, Research and Application, 1963–1973. New York, Grune & Stratton Inc, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beery KE: Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration. Chicago, Follett Educational Corporation, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lenton DA: Review of the Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration, in Buros OK (ed): The Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ, Gryphon Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chissom BS: Review of the Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration, in Buros OK (ed): The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ, Gryphon Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gabel, S., Oster, G.D., Butnik, S.M. (1986). Educational and Perceptual Testing. In: Understanding Psychological Testing in Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0554-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0554-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0556-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0554-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics