Advertisement

Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents: Comments and Conclusions

  • W. Patrick Luckett
  • Jean-Louis Hartenberger
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series book series (NSSA, volume 92)

Abstract

The Paris Symposium on Rodent Evolution brought together a variety of biologists (paleontologists, comparative anatomists, embryologists, molecular biologists, and geneticists) who shared a common interest in the assessment of phylogenetic relationships among rodents and other mammals. A diversity of methodological strategies for phylogenetic reconstruction was also represented, including traditional paleontological searches for anagenetic or ancestral-descendant relationships; cladistic analyses of dental and cranial features in fossil and extant rodents; phenetic and cladistic analyses of soft anatomical and developmental features; form-functional considerations of selected postcranial, dental, and soft anatomical traits; and maximum parsimony, cladistic, and immunological distance analyses of molecular data. Surprisingly, perhaps, this variety of methodologies and data was accepted with tolerance by most participants, and there was a genuine sense of willingness to listen and to learn on the part of the vast majority of participants. Semantic disagreements over the “best” approaches to phylogenetic analysis were kept to a minimum, perhaps because most participants were anxious to learn about any evidence that might shed light on the uncertainties surrounding the possible evolutionary relationships among the 50 families of extant and fossil rodents (as recognized by Carleton, 1984).

Keywords

Late Eocene Fetal Membrane Shared Similarity Cranial Morphology Amino Acid Sequence Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black, C. C. and Sutton, J. F. 1984. Paleocene and Eocene rodents of North America. Carneg. Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ. 9: 67–84.Google Scholar
  2. Boiler, N. 1970. Untersuchungen an Schädel, Kaumuskulatur und äusserer Hirnform von Cryptomys hottentotus (Rodentia, Bathyergidae). Z. wiss. Zool. 181: 7–65.Google Scholar
  3. Brownell, E. 1983. DNA/DNA hybridization studies of muroid rodents: Symmetry and rates of molecular evolution. Evolution 37: 1034–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carleton, M. D. 1984. Introduction to rodents. In: Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World, S. Anderson and J. K. Jones, Jr., ed., pp. 255–265, John Wiley and Sons, N. Y.Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, M. R. 1970. Paleontology and geology of the Badwater Creek area, central Wyoming. Part 6. The leporid Mytonolagus (Mammalia, Lagomorpha). Ann. Carneg. Mus. 41: 215–230.Google Scholar
  6. Dawson, M. R. 1977. Late Eocene rodent radiations: North America, Europe and Asia. Géobios Mém. Spéc. 1: 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson, M. R. and Krishtalka, L. 1984. Fossil history of the families of Recent mammals. In: Orders and Families of Recent Mammals of the World, S. Anderson and J. K. Jones, Jr., eds., pp. 11–57, John Wiley and Son, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Dawson, M. R., Li, C.-K. and Qi, T. 1984. Eocene ctenodactyloid rodents (Mammalia) of Eastern and Central Asia. Carneg. Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ. 9: 138–150.Google Scholar
  9. Flynn, L. J. 1982. Systematic revision of Siwalik Rhizomyidae (Rodentia). Geobios 15: 327–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gidley, J. W. 1912. The lagomorphs an independent order. Science 36: 285–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregory, W. K. 1910. The orders of mammals. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 27: 1–524.Google Scholar
  12. Hartenberger, J.-L. 1980. Donnees et hypotheses sur la radiation initiale des rongeurs. Palaeovertebrata Mém. Jubil. R. Lavocat: 285-301.Google Scholar
  13. Hussain, S. T., De Bruijn, H., and Leinders, J. M. 1978. Middle Eocene rodents from the Kala Chitta Range (Punjab, Pakistan). Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Amsterdam, Ser. B. 81: 74–112.Google Scholar
  14. Korth, W. W. 1984. Early Tertiary evolution and radiation of rodents in North America. Bull. Carneg. Mus. Nat. Hist. 24: 1–71.Google Scholar
  15. Lavocat, R. 1973. Les Rongeurs du Miocène d’Afrique Orientale. I. Miocène inférieur. Mém. Trav. E.P.H.E., Inst. Montpellier 1: 1–284.Google Scholar
  16. Li, C.-K. 1965. Eocene leporids of North China. Vert. PalAsiat. 9: 23–36.Google Scholar
  17. Li, C.-K. 1977. Paleocene eurymyloids (Anagalida, Mammalia) of Qianshan, Anhui. Vert. PalAsiat. 15: 103–118.Google Scholar
  18. MacPhee, R. D. E. 1981. Auditory regions of primates and eutherian insectivores. Contrib. Primat. 18: 1–282.Google Scholar
  19. McKenna, M. C. 1969. The origin and early differentiation of therian mammals. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 167: 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Novacek, M. J. 1977. Evolution and Relationships of the Leptictidae (Eutheria: Mammalia). Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. Novacek, M. J. 1980. Cranioskeletal features in tupaiids and selected Eutheria as phylogenetic evidence. In: Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews, W. P. Luckett, ed., pp. 35–93, Plenum Press, N. Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simpson, G. G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 85: 1–350.Google Scholar
  23. Simpson, G. G. 1959. The nature and origin of supraspecific taxa. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 24: 255–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Szalay, F. S. 1977. Ancestors, descendants, sister groups and testing of phylogenetic hypotheses. Syst. Zool. 26: 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tullberg, T. 1899. Ueber das System der Nagetiere: eine phylogenetische Studie. Nova Acta Reg. Soc. Scient. Upsala, ser. 3, 18: 1–514.Google Scholar
  26. Van Valen, L. 1971. Adaptive zones and the orders of mammals. Evolution 25: 420–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wahlert, J. H. 1974. The cranial foramina of protrogomorphous rodents; an anatomical and phylogenetic study. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 146: 363–410.Google Scholar
  28. Wahlert, J. H. 1977. Cranial foramina and relationships of Eutypomys (Rodentia, Eutypomyidae). Amer. Mus. Novit. 2626: 1–8.Google Scholar
  29. Wahlert, J. H. 1978. Cranial foramina and relationships of the Eomyoidea (Rodentia, Geomorpha). Skull and upper teeth of Kansasimys. Amer. Mus. Novit. 2645: 1–16.Google Scholar
  30. Weber, M. 1904. Die Säugetiere. Gustav Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, R. W. 1949. Early Tertiary rodents of North America. Carneg. Inst. Wash. Publ. 584: 67–164.Google Scholar
  32. Wood, A. E. 1955. A revised classification of the rodents. J. Mammal. 36: 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wood, A. E. 1957. What, if anything, is a rabbit? Evolution 11: 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood, A. E. 1959. Eocene radiation and phylogeny of the rodents. Evolution 13: 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wood, A. E. 1962. The early Tertiary rodents of the Family Paramyidae. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. 52: 1–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood, A. E. 1965. Grades and clades among rodents. Evolution 19: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood, A. E. 1968. Early Cenozoic mammalian faunas, Fayum Province, Egypt. Part II. The African Oligocene Rodentia. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 28: 23–105.Google Scholar
  38. Wood, A. E. 1974a. The evolution of the Old World and New World hystricomorphs. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 34: 21–60.Google Scholar
  39. Wood, A. E. 1974b. Early Tertiary vertebrate faunas, Vieja Group, Trans-Pecos Texas: Rodentia. Tex. Mem. Mus. Bull. 21: 1–112.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, A. E. 1975. The problem of the hystricognathous rodents. Univ. Mich., Papers Paleontol. 12: 75–80.Google Scholar
  41. Wood, A. E. 1980. The Oligocene rodents of North America. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. 70: 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood, A. E. 1984. Hystricognathy in the North American Oligocene rodent Cylindrodon and the origin of the Caviomorpha. Carneg. Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ. 9: 151–160.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Patrick Luckett
    • 1
  • Jean-Louis Hartenberger
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, School of MedicineUniversity of Puerto RicoSan JuanUSA
  2. 2.Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, LA 327U. S. T. L.MontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations