Advertisement

Origin and Evolutionary Relationships among Geomyoids

  • Volker Fahlbusch
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series book series (NSSA, volume 92)

Abstract

Contents, relationships, and origin of geomyoid rodents have been commented on quite differently during the past, in zoology as well as in paleontology. On the part of zoologists this superfamily contains the well defined families Heteromyidae and Geomyidae, both of them restricted more or less to North America. According to jaw musculature they are mostly assigned to the Sciuromorpha. Following Wilson’s (1949) revision of some Oligocene Eomyidae, these also were incorporated into the Geomyoidea by many paleontologists. Moreover, as Wilson (1949) discussed morphological relations to some myomorphs (in which, however, he did not put them), the whole superfamily later became attributed to the Myomorpha in paleontological literature (e.g. Wood, 1955a), a fact, I believe, with which zoologists became scarcely familiar. Some people even considered the whole group to be a separate suborder Geomorpha (Thaler, 1966). Due to the lack of adequate fossils, little is known of the origin of these rodents, except for some necessarily preliminary assumptions dealing with various groups of the Protrogomorpha as possible ancestors.

Keywords

Middle Miocene Middle Eocene Cheek Tooth Tooth Morphology Pocket Gopher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black, C. C. and Dawson, M. R. 1966. Paleontology and geology of the Badwater Creek Area, Central Wyoming. Part 1. History of field work and geological setting. Ann. Carneg. Mus. 31: 297–307.Google Scholar
  2. Dawson, M. R. 1968. Middle Eocene rodents (Mammalia) from Northeastern Utah. Ann. Carneg. Mus. 39: 327–370.Google Scholar
  3. Ellerman, J. R. 1940. The Families and Genera of Living Rodents, Vol. 1. Rodents Other than Muridae. British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London.Google Scholar
  4. Emry, R. J. 1972. A new heteromyid rodent from the Early Oligocene of Natrona County, Wyoming. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 85: 179–190.Google Scholar
  5. Emry, R. J. 1981. New material of the Oligocene muroid rodent Nonomys, and its bearing on muroid origins. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2712: 1–14.Google Scholar
  6. Emry, R. J. and Dawson, M. R. 1972. A unique cricetid (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the Early Oligocene of Natrona County, Wyoming. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2508: 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. Emry, R. J. and Dawson, M. R. 1973. Nonomys, new name for the cricetid (Rodentia, Mammalia) genus Nanomys Emry and Dawson. J. Paleont. 47: 1003.Google Scholar
  8. Fahlbusch, V. 1970. Populationsverschiebungen bei tertiären Nagetieren, eine Studie an oligozänen und miozänen Eomyidae Europas. Abh. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. Math.-naturw. K1., N. F. 145: 1–136.Google Scholar
  9. Fahlbusch, V. 1973. Die stammesgeschichtlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Eomyiden (Mammalia, Rodentia) Nordamerikas und Europas. Mitt. Bayer. Staatsslg. Paläont. hist. Geol. 13: 141–175.Google Scholar
  10. Fahlbusch, V. 1979. Eomyidae-Geschichte einer Säugetierfamilie. Paläont. Z. 53: 88–97.Google Scholar
  11. Fahlbusch, V., Qiu, Z., and Storch, G. 1983. Neogene mammalian faunas of Ertemte and Harr Obo in Nei Mongol, China. −1. Report on field work in 1980 and preliminary results. Scient. Sin. Ser. B. 26: 205–224.Google Scholar
  12. Gawne, C. E. 1975. Rodents from the Zia Sand Miocene of New Mexico. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2586: 1–25.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, J. M. and Wood, A. E. 1969. A new genus of eomyid rodent from the Oligocene Ash Spring Local Fauna of Trans-Pecos Texas. Texas Mem. Mus. Pearce-Sellards Ser. 14: 1–7.Google Scholar
  14. Hartenberger, J.-L. 1971. Contribution à l’étude des genres Gliravus et Microparamys (Rodentia) de l’Eocène d’Europe. Palaeovertebrata 4: 97–135.Google Scholar
  15. Li, C.-K. 1974. A probable geomyoid rodent from Middle Miocene of Linchu, Shantung. Vert. PalAsiat. 12: 43–53.Google Scholar
  16. Lillegraven, J. A. 1977. Small rodents (Mammalia) from Eocene deposits of San Diego County, California. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 158: 221–261.Google Scholar
  17. Rensberger, J. M. 1971. Entoptychine pocket gophers (Mammalia, Geomyoidea) of the Early Miocene John Day Formation, Oregon. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 90: 1–209.Google Scholar
  18. Rensberger, J. M. 1973a. Pleurolicine rodents (Geomyoidea) of the John Day Formation, Oregon. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 102: 1–95.Google Scholar
  19. Rensberger, J. M. 1973b. Sanctimus (Mammalia, Rodentia) and the phyletic relationships of the large Arikareean geomyoids. J. Paleont. 47: 835–853.Google Scholar
  20. Thaler, L. 1966. Les rongeurs fossiles du Bas-Languedoc dans leur rapports avec l’histoire des faunes et la stratigraphie du Tertiaire d’Europe. Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat., sér. C. 17: 1–295.Google Scholar
  21. Troxell, E. L. 1923. Diplolophus, a new genus of rodents. Amer. J. Sci. 5: 157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wahlert, J. H. 1978. Cranial foramina and relationships of the Eomyoidea (Rodentia, Geomorpha). Skull and upper teeth of Kansasimys. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2645: 1–16.Google Scholar
  23. Wahlert, J. H. 1983. Relationships of the Florentiamyidae (Rodentia, Geomyoidea) based on cranial and dental morphology. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2769: 1–23.Google Scholar
  24. Wilson, R. W. 1940. Two new Eocene rodents from California. Carneg. Inst. Wash. Publ. 514: 85–95.Google Scholar
  25. Wilson, R. W. 1949. On some White River fossil rodents. Carneg. Inst. Wash. Publ. 584: 27–50.Google Scholar
  26. Wood, A. E. 1936. A new subfamily of heteromyid rodents from the Miocene of Western United States. Amer. J. Sci. 31: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wood, A. E. 1955a. A revised classification of the rodents. J. Mammal. 36: 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wood, A. E. 1955b. Rodents from the Lower Oligocene Yoder Formation of Wyoming. J. Paleont. 29: 519–524.Google Scholar
  29. Wood, A. E. 1974. Early Tertiary vertebrate faunas Vieja Group, Trans-Pecos Texas: Rodentia. Texas Mem. Mus. Bull. 21: 1–112.Google Scholar
  30. Wood, A. E. 1980. The Oligocene rodents of North America. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. 70: 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Fahlbusch
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Paläontologie und historische GeologieUniversität MünchenMünchen 2West Germany

Personalised recommendations