Phylogenetic Analysis of Middle Ear Features in Fossil and Living Rodents

  • René Lavocat
  • Jean-Pierre Parent
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series book series (NSSA, volume 92)

Abstract

The anatomy of the middle ear of mammals is certainly well known and has recently been redescribed by Parent (1980). Nevertheless, it seems advisable to recall the main features of this anatomy, which can be used to evaluate the probable affinities of the various groups of rodents.

Keywords

Internal Carotid Artery External Auditory Meatus Primitive Character Tympanic Cavity Facial Canal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bohlin, B. 1946. The fossil mammals from the Tertiary deposits of Taben-Buluk, Western Kansu. Part II. Paleont. Sinica, New Series C (8b): 1–259.Google Scholar
  2. Bugge, J. 1974. The cephalic arterial system in insectivores, primates, rodents and lagomorphs, with special reference to the systematic classification. Acta Anat. 87(Suppl. 62): 1–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellerman, J. R. 1940. The Families and Genera of Living Rodents. Vol. I. Rodents Other than Muridae. British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London.Google Scholar
  4. Hartenberger, J.-L. 1971. Contribution à l’étude des genres Gliravus et Microparamys (Rodentia) de l’Eocene d’Europe. Palaeovertebrata 4: 97–135.Google Scholar
  5. Hartenberger, J.-L. 1982. A review of the Eocene rodents of Pakistan. Contrib. Mus. Paleont. U. Mich. 26: 19–35.Google Scholar
  6. Hussain, S. T., de Bruijn, H. and Leinders, J. M. 1978. Middle Eocene rodents from the Kala Chitta Range (Punjab, Pakistan). Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Ser. B, 81: 74–112.Google Scholar
  7. Jaeger, J.-J. 1977. Les rongeurs du Miocène moyen du Maghreb. Palaeovertebrata 8: 1–144.Google Scholar
  8. Lavocat, R. 1951. Révision de la faune des mammifères Oligocènes d’Auvergne et du Velay. Editions Sciences et Avenir, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Lavocat, R. 1967. Observations sur la région auditive des Rongeurs Théridomorphes. Col. Inter. C. N. R. S., Problèmes actuels de Paléontologie 163: 491–501.Google Scholar
  10. Lavocat, R. 1973. Les Rongeurs du Miocène d’Afrique Orientale. I. Miocène inférieur. Mém. Trav. E. P. H. E. (Montpellier) 1: 1–284.Google Scholar
  11. Lavocat, R. 1976. Rongeurs caviomorphes de l’Oligocène de Bolivie. II. Rongeurs du bassin de Salla-Luribay. Palaeovertebrata 8: 15–90.Google Scholar
  12. Lavocat, R. and Michaux, J. 1966. Interprétation de la structure dentaire des rongeurs africains de la famille des Pedetidae. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris 262D: 1677–1679.Google Scholar
  13. MacPhee, R. D. E. 1981. Auditory regions of primates and eutherian insectivores. Contrib. Primatol. 18: 1–284.Google Scholar
  14. Mahboubi, M., Ameur, R., Crochet, J.-Y. and Jaeger, J.-J. 1984. Earliest known proboscidean from early Eocene of North-west Africa. Nature 308: 543–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matthew, W. D. 1909. The Carnivora and Insectivora of the Bridger Basin, middle Eocene. Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 9: 289–567.Google Scholar
  16. Parent, J.-P. 1980. Recherches sur l’oreille moyenne des Rongeurs actuels et fossiles. Anatomie. Valeur systématique. Mém. Trav. E. P. H. E. (Montpellier) 11: 1–286.Google Scholar
  17. Parent, J.-P. 1983. Anatomie et valeur systématique de l’oreille moyenne des rongeurs actuels et fossiles. Mammalia 47: 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Patterson, B. and Wood, A. E. 1982. Rodents from the Deseadan Oligocene of Bolivia and the relationships of the Caviomorpha. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard 149: 371–543.Google Scholar
  19. Pocock, T. N. 1976. Pliocene mammalian fauna from Langebaanweg. A new fossil genus linking the Otomyinae with the Muridae. S. Afr. J. Sci. 72: 58–60.Google Scholar
  20. Presley, R. 1979. The primitive course of the internal carotid artery in mammals. Acta Anat. 103: 238–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saban, R. 1963. Contribution à 1’étude de l’os temporal des Primates. Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat., Paris, sér. A, 29: 1–377.Google Scholar
  22. Wahlert, J. H. 1977. Cranial foramina and relationships of Eutypomys (Rodentia, Eutypomyidae). Amer. Mus. Novit. 2626: 1–8.Google Scholar
  23. Wahlert, J. H. 1978. Cranial foramina and relationships of the Eomyoidea (Rodentia, Geomorpha). Skull and upper teeth of Kansasimys. Amer. Mus. Novit. 2645: 1–16.Google Scholar
  24. Wahlert, J. H. 1983. Relationships of the Florentiamyidae (Rodentia, Geomyoidea) based on cranial and dental morphology. Amer. Mus. Novit. 2769: 1–23.Google Scholar
  25. Wood, A. E. 1962. The early Tertiary rodents of the family Paramyidae. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. 52: 1–261.Google Scholar
  26. Wood, A. E. 1968. The African Oligocene Rodentia. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 28: 23–105.Google Scholar
  27. Wood, A. E. 1974. The evolution of the Old World and New World hystricomorphs. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 34: 21–60.Google Scholar
  28. Wood, A. E. 1980. The Oligocene rodents of North America. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. 70: 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Lavocat
    • 1
  • Jean-Pierre Parent
    • 2
  1. 1.Ecole Pratique des Hautes EtudesUSTLMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Institut Supérieur d’AgricultureLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations