Cranial Foramina of Rodents

  • John H. Wahlert
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series book series (NSSA, volume 92)


A paleontologist does not have the luxury of designing experiments to test hypotheses; the experiments, termed evolution, have already occurred. It is the job of the paleontologist to use the sparse evidence of fossil remains, along with the surviving results of evolution, in order to discover the experiments. Any aspect of morphology, from molecules to entire animals, can yield valuable evidence.


Zygomatic Arch Cheek Tooth Infraorbital Canal Infraorbital Foramen Stapedial Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bateman, N. 1954. Bone growth: A study of the grey-lethal and microphthalmic mutants of the mouse. J. Anat. 88: 212–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckland-Wright, J. C. 1978. Bone structure and the patterns of force transmission in the cat skull (Felis catus). J. Morphol. 155: 35–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bugge, J. 1970. The contribution of the stapedial artery to the cephalic arterial supply in muroid rodents. Acta Anat. 76: 313–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bugge, J. 1971a. The cephalic arterial system in mole-rats (Spalacidae) bamboo rats (Rhizomyidae), jumping mice and jerboas (Dipodoidea) and dormice (Gliroidea) with special reference to the systematic classification of rodents. Acta Anat. 79: 165–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bugge, J. 1971b. The cephalic arterial system in sciuromorphs with special reference to the systematic classification of rodents. Acta Anat. 80: 336–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bugge, J. 1971c. The cephalic arterial system in New and Old World hystricomorphs, and in bathyergoids, with special reference to the systematic classification of rodents. Acta Anat. 80: 516–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bugge, J. 1974. The cephalic arterial system in insectivores, primates, rodents and lagomorphs, with special reference to the systematic classification. Acta Anat. 87(suppl. 62): 1–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coues, E. 1877. Family Haplodontidae. In: Monographs of North American Rodentia, E. Coues and J. A. Allen, pp. 543-600, Rep. U. S. Geol. Surv. Terr. 11.Google Scholar
  9. Eastman, C. B. 1982. Hystricomorphy as the primitive condition of the rodent masticatory apparatus. Evol. Theory 6: 163–165.Google Scholar
  10. Greene, E. C. 1935. Anatomy of the rat. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc., n.s., 27: 1–370.Google Scholar
  11. Guthrie, D. A. 1963. The carotid circulation in the Rodentia. Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool. 128: 455–481.Google Scholar
  12. Guthrie, D. A. 1969. The carotid circulation in Aplodontia. J. Mammal. 50: 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guthrie, D. A., and N. De Long. 1977. Carotid arteries in the rodent genera Pappogeomys, Geomys and Thomomys (family Geomyidae). Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 76: 63–66.Google Scholar
  14. Hartenberger, J.-L. 1980. Donnees et hypotheses sur la radiation initiale des Rongeurs. Palaeovertebrata, Mem. Jubil. R. Lavocat: 285-301.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, J. E. 1935. The cranial foramina in rodents. J. Mammal. 16: 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, J. E. 1937. Morphology of the pocket gopher mammalian genus Thomomys. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 42: 81–172.Google Scholar
  17. Howell, A. B. 1932. The saltatorial rodent Dipodomys: The functional and comparative anatomy of its muscular and osseous systems. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. 67: 375–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hussain, S. T., H. de Bruijn, and J. M. Leinders. 1978. Middle Eocene rodents from the Kala Chitta Range (Punjab, Pakistan) (1). Proc. Koninkl. Nederland. Akad. Wetensch., Amsterdam, ser. B, 81: 74–112.Google Scholar
  19. Hyman, L. H. 1942. Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy. Univ. Chicago Pr., Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Klingener, D. 1964. The comparative myology of four dipodoid rodents (Genera Zapus, Napaeozapus, Sicista, and Jaculus). Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, no. 124: 1–100.Google Scholar
  21. Landry, S. O., Jr. 1957. The interrelationships of the New and Old World hystricomorph rodents. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 56: 1–118.Google Scholar
  22. Lavocat, R. 1974. What is an hystricomorph? Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 34: 7–20.Google Scholar
  23. Li, C. K. 1977. Paleocene eurymyloids (Anagalida, Mammalia) of Qianshan, Anhui. Vert. PalAsiat. 15: 103–118.Google Scholar
  24. McDowell, S. B., Jr. 1958. The Greater Antillean insectivores. Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist. 115: 113–214.Google Scholar
  25. Merriam, C. H. 1895. Monographic revision of the pocket gophers family Geomyidae (exclusive of the species of Thomomys). North Amer. Fauna 8: 1–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, M. E. 1964. Anatomy of the Dog. W. B. Saunders Co., Phila.Google Scholar
  27. Musser, G. G. 1981a. Results of the Archbold Expeditions. No. 105. Notes on the systematics of Indo-Malayan murid rodents, and descriptions of new genera and species from Ceylon, Sulawesi, and the Philippines. Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist. 168: 225–334.Google Scholar
  28. Musser, G. G. 1981b. The giant rat of Flores and its relatives east of Borneo and Bali. Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist. 169: 67–176.Google Scholar
  29. Musser, G. G. 1982a. Results of the Archbold Expediations. No. 108. The definition of Apomys, a native rat of the Philippine Islands. Amer. Mus. Novit. 2746: 1–43.Google Scholar
  30. Musser, G. G. 1982b. Results of the Archbold Expeditions. No. 110. Crunomys and the small-bodied shrew rats native to the Philippine Islands and Sulawesi (Celebes). Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist. 174: 1–95.Google Scholar
  31. Musser, G. G., and C. Newcomb. 1983. Malaysian murids and the giant rat of Sumatra. Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. Hist. 174: 327–598.Google Scholar
  32. Novacek, M. J. 1980. Cranioskeletal features in tupaiids and selected Eutheria as phylogenetic evidence. In: Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews, W. P. Luckett, ed., pp. 35–93, Plenum Publ. Corp., New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patterson, B., and A. E. Wood. 1982. Rodents from the Deseadan Oligocene of Bolivia and the relationships of the Caviomorpha. Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool. 149: 371–543.Google Scholar
  34. Presley, R. 1979. The primitive course of the internal carotid artery in mammals. Acta Anat. 103: 238–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tandler, J. 1899. Zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Kopfarterien bei den Mammalia. Denkschr. kaiserlich. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Natur. Cl. 67: 677–784.Google Scholar
  36. Ting, S., and C. K. Li. 1984. The structure of the ear region of Rhombomylus (Anagalida, Mammalia). Vert. PalAsiat. 22: 92–102 (in Chinese, English summary).Google Scholar
  37. Turnbull, W. D. 1970. Mammalian masticatory apparatus. Fieldiana: Geol. 18: 147–356.Google Scholar
  38. Vianey-Liaud, M. 1976. Les Issiodoromyinae (Rodentia, Theridomyidae) de l’Eocène supérieur à l’Oligocène supérieur en Europe occidentale. Palaeovertebrata 7: 1–115.Google Scholar
  39. Wahlert, J. H. 1972. The cranial foramina of protrogomorphous and sciuromorphous rodents; an anatomical and phylogenetic study. Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard Univ., Cambridge.Google Scholar
  40. Wahlert, J. H. 1974. The cranial foramina of protrogomorphous rodents; an anatomical and phylogenetic study. Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool. 146: 363–410.Google Scholar
  41. Wahlert, J. H. 1977. Cranial foramina and relationships of Eutypomys (Rodentia, Eutypomyidae). Amer. Mus. Novit. 2626: 1–8.Google Scholar
  42. Wahlert, J. H. 1978. Cranial foramina and relationships of the Eomyoidea (Rodentia, Geomorpha). Skull and upper teeth of Kansasimys. Amer. Mus. Novit. 2645: 1–16.Google Scholar
  43. Wahlert, J. H. 1983. Relationships of the Florentiamyidae (Rodentia, Geomyoidea) based on cranial and dental morphology. Amer. Mus. Novit. 2769: 1–23.Google Scholar
  44. Wahlert, J. H. in press. Skull morphology and relationships of geomyoid rodents. Amer. Mus. Novit.Google Scholar
  45. Wood, A. E. 1935. Evolution and relationships of the heteromyid rodents. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 24: 73–262.Google Scholar
  46. Wood, A. E. 1962. The early Tertiary rodents of the family Paramyidae. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc., n.s., 52(pt. 1): 1–261.Google Scholar
  47. Wood, A. E. 1965. Grades and clades among rodents. Evolution 19: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wood, A. E. 1974. Early Tertiary vertebrate faunas, Vieja Group, Trans-Pecos Texas: Rodentia. Bull. Texas Memorial Mus. 21: 1–112.Google Scholar
  49. Wood, A. E. 1976. The Oligocene rodents Ischyromys and Titanotheriomys and the content of the family Ischyromyidae. In: Athlon: Essays on Paleontology in Honour of Loris Shano Russell, C. S. Churcher, ed., pp. 244-277, Royal Ontario Mus., Life Sci., Misc. Publ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. Wahlert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Vertebrate PaleontologyAmerican Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations