Ethnography and the Vicissitudes of Talk in Psychotherapy

  • Roy D. Pea
  • Robert L. Russell
Part of the Emotions, Personality, and Psychotherapy book series (EPPS)


Interpretive Approach Sequencing Rule Rule Account Conversational Interaction Contrastive Stress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blum, A. F., & McHugh, P. (1971). The social ascription of motives. American Sociological Review, 36, 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, D. T. (1972). Herskovits, cultural relativism and metascience. In F. Herskovits (Ed.), Cultural relativism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Cicourel, A. V. (1979). Speech acts and conversations: Bringing language back into sociology. Contemporary Sociology, 8, 168–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, E. V., & Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55, 767–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, H. H. (1977). Bridging. In P. N. Johnson-Laird, & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Essays in cognitive science (pp. 411–420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, P., & Morgan, J. (Eds.). (1975). Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, P. O., & Costello, C. G. (1969). N = 1: Experimental studies of single cases. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  11. Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-co-occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes (Eds.)., The ethnography of communication (pp. 213–250). New York: Holt, Rinehard & Winston.Google Scholar
  12. Fishman, J. A. (1972). The sociology of language. In P. P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 45–58). England: Penguin Education.Google Scholar
  13. Frake, C. (1977). Plying frames can be dangerous. Institute for Comparative Human Development Newsletter, 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, B. (1971). An examination of the performative analysis. Indiana University Linguistics Club. Google Scholar
  15. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures, New York: Baic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Giglioli, P. P. (Ed.). (1972). Language and social context. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  19. Grimshaw, A. D. (1979). What’s been done—When all’s been said? Contemporary Sociology, 8, 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimshaw, A. D. (1980). Social interactional and sociolinguistic rules. Social Forces, 58, 789–810.Google Scholar
  21. Gross, L. (1959). Symposium on sociological theory. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  22. Hancher, M. (1979). The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 8, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hymes, D. (1968). The ethnography of speaking. In J. A. Fishman (Ed.), Readings in the sociology of language (pp. 99–138). The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hymes, D. (1972a). Toward ethnographies of communication: The analysis of communicative events. In P. P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 21–44). England: Penguin Education.Google Scholar
  25. Hymes, D. (1972b). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes (Eds.), The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York: Holt, Rinehard, & Winston.Google Scholar
  26. Hymes, D. (1974). Ways of speaking. In R. Bauman, & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 431–451). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, N. B., & Konner, M. J. (1976).!Kung knowledge of animal behavior. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Kalahari hunter gatherers (pp. 325–348). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kaplan, B. (1981, June 1). Genetic-dramatistic approach. Paper presented at Developmental Psychology for the 1980’s: Werner’s Influences on Theory and Praxis, Heinz Werner Institute of Developmental Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  29. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  30. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Langer, J. (1980). The origins of logic: 6 to 12 months. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Leiter, K. (1980). A primer on ethnomethodology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Luria, A. R. (1968). The mind of a mneumonist. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. McCawley, J. D. (1977). Remarks on the lexicography of performative verbs. In A. Rogers, B. Wall, & J. P. Murphy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Texas Conference on performatives, presuppositions, and implicatures (pp. 13–25). Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  35. McDermott, R. P., & Roth, D. R. (1978). The social organization of behavior: Interactional approaches. Annual Review of Anthropology, 7, 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDermott, R. P., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McQuown, N. E., Bateson, G., Birdwhistell, R., Brosen, H., & Hockett, C. (1971). The natural history of an interview. Microfilm Collection of Manuscripts in Cultural Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Library.Google Scholar
  38. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, G. A. (1975). Some comments on competence and performance. In D. Aaronson & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics and communication disorders. New York; New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  40. Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated action and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (43–72). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. O’Keefe, D. J. (1979). Ethnomethodology. Theory of Social Behavior, 9, 118–219.Google Scholar
  43. Pittenger, R. E., Hockett, C. F., & Danehey, J. J. (1960). The first five minutes. Ithaca, NY: Paul Martineau.Google Scholar
  44. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rogers, A., Wall, B., & Murphy, J. P. (Eds.). (1977). Proceedings of the Texas Conference on performatives, presuppositions and implicatures. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  47. Russell, B. (1940). An inquiry into meaning and truth. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  48. Russell, R. L. (1979). Speech acts, conversational sequencing, and rules. Contemporary Sociology, 8, 176–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. (Reprinted in Schenkein, J. [Ed.]. [1978]. Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scheflen, A. E. (1973). Communicational structure. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Shegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  52. Schenkein, J. (1978). Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Searle, J. R. (1965). What is a speech act? In M. Black (Ed.), Philosophy in America (pp. 221–239). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sinclair, J. McH., Forsyth, I. J., Coulthard, R. M., & Ashby, M. C. (1972). The English used by teachers and pupils. Final S.S.R.C. Report, Birmingham University.Google Scholar
  57. Stone, C. A., & Day, M. C. (1980). Competence and performance models and the characterization of formal operational skills. Human Development, 23, 323–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review, 73, 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Streeck, J. (1980). Review of Labov and Fanshel, ‘Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation.’ Language in Society, 9, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sturtevant, W. C. (1974). Studies in ethnoscience. In B. G. Blount (Ed.), Language, Culture, and Society (pp. 153–176). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Turner, J. H. (1974). The structure of sociological theory. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  62. Turner, R. (1972). Some formal properties of therapy talk. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wilson, T. P. (1970). Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation. American Sociological Review, 35, 697–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy D. Pea
    • 1
  • Robert L. Russell
    • 2
  1. 1.Educational Communication and Technology ProgramNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyNew School for Social ResearchNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations