Abstract
The Mössbauer effect has become a popular method in analytical chemistry. In contrast to other techniques such as x-ray spectroscopy, NMR, EPR, and MCD where highly sophisticated evaluation procedures are applied to obtain reliable information on the chemical compound, the Mössbauer effect is generally used on a low level concerning the evaluation of quadrupole split spectra. This procedure on a low level is favored by the structure of the spectra especially the simple doublet of the 3/2 → 1/2 nuclear transitions in paramagnetic and diamagnetic compounds. The separation of the two absorption lines, the quadrupole splitting ΔE Q and the center of the two lines, the isomer shift, are easily derived from the spectra. To obtain these two parameters, which comprise already a lot of chemical information, there is no need of a complete theory. Further information from the quadrupole split spectra is given by the sign and the asymmetry of the electric field gradient tensor at the nucleus and its orientation with respect to the crystal axes. The evaluation of these parameters from the Mössbauer spectra requires already a relatively complicated theory which is only available in original publications.1–3 The situation is made even more difficult by the matter of fact that in most cases the tensor components cannot be uniquely measured; rather, only interrelations between them are obtained from the measured quantities of the spectra.4 A further complication is introduced by an anisotropic vibrational amplitude of the Mössbauer atom which gives rise to an anisotropic Debye—Waller factor. These points prevented a general application of all possibilities of the Mössbauer effect, although very nice work had been done on sodium nitroprusside5 and on the heme group of deoxymyoglobin6 and on CO-liganded myoglobin7 where the difficulties concerning the preparation of sufficiently large single crystals enriched in 57Fe had to be overcome. On the other hand the calculation of the electric field gradient in molecular crystals by molecular orbital (MO) approaches has been improved very much,8 so that a comparison with detailed experimental data has become desirable. It seems therefore to be justified to present in detail the mathematical tool for the evaluation of the quadrupole split Mössbauer spectra.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. Frauenfelder, D.E. Nagle, R.D. Taylor, D.R.F. Cochran, and W.M. Visscher, Phys. Rev. 126, 1065 (1962).
M. Blume and O.C. Kistner, Phys. Rev. 171, 417 (1968).
R.M. Housley, R.W. Grant, and U. Gonser, Phys. Rev. 178, 514 (1969).
R. Zimmermann, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 128, 537 (1975).
R.W. Grant, R.M. Housley, and U. Gonser, Phys. Rev. 178, 523 (1969).
Y. Maeda, T. Harami, A. Trautwein, and U. Gonser, Z. Naturforsch. 31b, 487 (1976).
F. Parak, U.F. Thomanek, D. Bade, and B. Wintergerst, Z. Naturforsch. 32c, 507 (1977).
M. Grodzicki, S. Lauer, and A.X. Trautwein, in Mössbauer Spectroscopy and its Chemical Applications, J.G. Stevens and G.K. Shenoy eds., Advances in Chemistry Series No. 194, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1981, p. 3.
R. Zimmerman, Chem. Phys. Lett. 34, 416 (1975).
Alumuddin, A. Lal, and K. Rama Reddy, Nuovo Cimento 32B, 389 (1976).
H. Spiering, Hyperfine Interactions 3, 213 (1977).
R.M. Steffen and K. Alder, in The Electrotnagnetic Interaction in Nuclear Spectroscopy, W.D. Hamilton, ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.
U. Gonser and H.D. Pfannes, J. Phys. (Paris) 35, C6–113 (1974).
H.D. Pfannes and H. Fischer, Appl. Phys. 13, 317 (1977).
H. Spiering and H. Vogel, J. Phys. (Paris) 40, C2–50 (1979).
M. Rots, R. Coussement, J. Claes, and L. Hermans, Hyperfine Interactions 11, 185 (1981).
V.I. Goldanskii, G.M. Gorodinskii, S.V. Karyagin, L.A. Korytko, L.M. Krizhanskii, E.F. Makarov, I.P. Suzdalev, and V.V. Khrapov, Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Chem. Sect. 147, 766 (1963).
S.V. Karyagin, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 148, 1102 (1963).
A. Abragam and B. Bleaney, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Transition Ions, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1970.
P.G.L. Williams and G.M. Bancroft, in Mössbauer Effect Methodology, I.J. Gruverman, ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1971, Vol. 7, p. 39.
P. Zory, Phys. Rev. 140, A1401 (1965).
S. Kareem, M. Ali, Alumuddin, and R.K. Tyagi, Proc. of the International Conference on the Application of the Mössbauer Effect, Jaipur, India, 1981, p. 583.
C.L. Chein, S. De Benedetti, and F. de S. Barros, Phys. Rev. B 10, 3913 (1974).
P. Imbert, Phys. Lett. 8, 95 (1964).
R.M. Housley and U. Gonser, Phys. Rev. 171, 480 (1968).
U. Gonser and H. Fischer, in Mössbauer Spectroscopy II, U. Gonser, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981, p. 49.
U. Fano, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 74 (1957).
M.E. Rose, Elementary Theory Of Angular Momentum, John Wiley, New York, 1957.
M. Lax, Rev. Mod. Phys. 126, 1045 (1962).
G.T. Trammell, Phys. Rev. 126, 1045 (1962).
G.T. Trammell and J.P. Hannon, Phys. Rev. 180, 337 (1969).
A.M. Afanas’ev and Y. Kagan, Phys. Lett. 31a, 38 (1970).
D.L. Nagy, Appl. Phys. 17, 269 (1978).
H. Prosser, F.E. Wagner, G. Wortmann, and G.M. Kalvius, Hyperfine Interactions 1, 25 (1975).
J.M. Greneche and F. Varret, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett. 43, L233 (1982).
T. Ericson and R. Wappling, J. Phys. (Paris) 37, C6–719 (1976).
U. Gonser, J. Phys. Chem. 66, 564 (1962).
R. Chandra and T. Ericsson, Hypetfine Interactions 7, 229 (1979).
C.L. Chien and A.W. Sleight, Phys. Rev. B 18, 2031 (1978).
V.I. Goldanskii and E.F. Makarov, in Chemical Applications of Mössbauer Spectroscopy, V.I. Goldanskii and R.H. Herber, eds., p. 105, Academic Press, New York, 1968.
E.R. Bauminger, A. Diamant, 1. Feiner, 1. Nowik, and S. Ofer, Phys. Lett. 50A, 321 (1974).
H. Armon, E.R. Bauminger, A. Diamant, I. Nowik, and S. Ofer, Solid State Commun. 15, 543 (1974).
M.O. Faltens and D.A. Shirley, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 4249 (1970).
H.D. Bartunik, W. Potzel, R.L. Mössbauer, and G. Kaindl, Z. Phys. 240, 1 (1970).
J. Danon, in Mössbauer Spectroscopy and its Applications, IAEA, Vienna, 1972.
A. Rosencwaig and D.T. Cromer, Acta Crystallogr. 12, 704 (1959).
M.T. Hirvonen, A.P. Jauho, T.E. Katila, J.A. Pohjonen, and K.J. Riski, J. Phys. (Paris) 37, C6–501 (1976).
W. Keune, S.K. Date, I. Dèzsi, U. Gonser, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 3914 (1975).
G.A. Bykow, P.Z. Hien, Soy. Phys. JETP 16, 646 (1963).
H. Spiering and H. Vogel, Hyperfine Interactions 3, 221 (1977).
A.J. Stone, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 107, 285 (1973).
R.M. Housley, U. Gonser, and R.W. Grant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1279 (1968).
M.C.D. Ure and P.A. Flinn, in Mössbauer Effect Methodology, 1.J. Gruverman, ed., Plenum Press New York, 1971, Vol. 7.
R. Zimmermann and R. Doerfler, J. Phys. (Paris) 41, C1–107 (1980).
T.C. Gibb, J. Phys. C, Solid State Phys. 7, 1001 (1974).
V.I. Goldanskii, E.F. Makarov, I.P. Suzdalev, and 1.A. Vinogradov, Soy. Phys. JETP 31, 407 (1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spiering, H. (1984). The Electric Field Gradient and the Quadrupole Interaction. In: Long, G.J. (eds) Mössbauer Spectroscopy Applied to Inorganic Chemistry. Modern Inorganic Chemistry, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0462-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0462-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0464-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0462-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive