Cultural Ecology and Individual Behavior

  • John W. Berry
Chapter
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 4)

Abstract

Traditionally, much of the discipline of psychology has attempted to comprehend behavior as a function of stimuli impinging upon an individual. In recent years, the approach of ecological psychology has noted that the stimuli usually employed in psychology really represent only a very narrow range of all possible stimuli, and that they are excessively artificial in character; as a result, ecological psychology has emphasized the need to study behavior in more molar and naturalistic contexts. Similarly, an emerging cross-cultural psychology has argued that we should be attending to broad ranges of situations drawn from a cross section of cultures. It soon became clear, though, that sampling from new cultures also meant sampling from the new environmental contexts in which the cultures were situated. Thus, it became essential that the movement cross-culturally be accompanied by increased attention to the environmental settings of the cultures studied, a position similar to that espoused by ecological psychology.

Keywords

Individual Behavior Cognitive Style Acculturative Stress Ecological Context Food Accumulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asch, S. E. Studies in independence and conformity 1; A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 1956, 70 (No. 416).Google Scholar
  2. Barker, R. G. Ecological psychology. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, H. Cross-cultural research with matched pairs of societies. Journal of Social Psychology, 1969, 79, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry, H., & Paxson, L. Infancy and early childhood: Cross-cultural codes. Ethnology, 1971, 10, 466–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry, H., Child, I., & Bacon, M. Relation of child training to subsistence economy. American Anthropologist, 1959, 61, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, J. W. Temne and Eskimo perceptual skills. International Journal of Psychology, 1966, 1, 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, J. W. Independence and conformity in subsistence-level societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 415–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, J. W. Ecological and cultural factors in spatial perceptual development. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1971, 3, 324–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, J. W. An ecological approach to cross-cultural psychology. Netherlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 1975, 30, 51–84.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, J. W. Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage-Halsted, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Berry, J. W. A cultural ecology of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press, 1979a.Google Scholar
  12. Berry, J. W. Social and cultural change. In H. Triandis & R. Brislin (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 5). Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1979b.Google Scholar
  13. Berry, J. W. Ecological analyses for cross-cultural psychology. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3). London: Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar
  14. Berry, J. W., & Annis, R. Acculturative stress: The role of ecology, culture and differentiation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1974, 5, 382–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bronfenbrenner, U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brunswik, E. Scope and aspects of the cognitive problem. In A. Gruber (Ed.), Cognition: The Colorado symposium. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957, pp. 5–31.Google Scholar
  17. Campbell, D. T. Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 1957, 54, 297–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chance, N. A. Acculturation, self-identification and personal adjustment. American Anthropologist, 1965, 67, 372–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, Y., (Ed.). Man in adaptation. Chicago: Aldine, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Dasen, P., Berry, J. W., & Witkin, H. A. The use of developmental theories across cultures. In L. Eckensberger (Ed.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1979.Google Scholar
  21. Dawson, J. L. M. Cultural and physiological influences upon spatial perceptual processes in West Africa. International Journal of Psychology, 1967, 2, 115–128, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dawson, J. L. M. Psychological effects of social change in West Africa. New Haven, Conn.: HRAF Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  23. Eckensberger, L., & Kornadt, H. The mutual relevance of the cross-cultural and the ecological prespective in psychology. In H. McGurk (Ed.), Ecological factors in human development. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1977, pp. 219–227.Google Scholar
  24. Edgerton, R. B. The individual in cultural adaptation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  25. Feldman, D. A. The history of the relationship between environment and culture in ethnological thought: An overview. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1975, 11, 67–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forde, D. Habitat, economy and society, London: Methuen, 1934.Google Scholar
  27. Hammond, K. R. (Ed.). The psychology of Egon Brunswik. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966.Google Scholar
  28. Horney, K. In R. Munroe, Schools of psychoanalytic thought. New York: Holt, 1955.Google Scholar
  29. Lewin, K. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacArthur, R. S. Some ability patterns: Central Eskimos and Nsenga Africans. International Journal of Psychology, 1973, 8, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacArthur, R. S. Differential ability patterns: Inuit, Nsenga and Canadian Whites. In J. W. Berry & W. J. Lonner (Eds.), Applied cross-cultural psychology. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1975, pp. 237–241.Google Scholar
  32. Murdock, G. P. World ethnographic sample. American Anthropologist, 1957, 59, 664–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murdock, G. P. Correlations of subsistence patterns. In D. Damas (Ed.), Ecological Essays National Museum of Canada Bulletin No, . 230 (Anthropological Series No. 86)1969, pp. 129–146.Google Scholar
  34. Nimkoff, M. F., & Middleton, R. Types of family and types of economy. American Journal of Sociology, 1960, 66, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Okonji, M. O. Differential effects of rural and urban upbringing on the development of cognitive style. International Journal of Psychology, 1969, 4, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Okonii, M. O. Cognitive styles across culture. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2). London: Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar
  37. Pelto, P. The difference between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 1968, (April), 37–40.Google Scholar
  38. Postman, L., & Tolman, E. Brunswik’s probabalistic functionalism. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 1). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. pp. 502–564.Google Scholar
  39. Segall, M., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovits, M. The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.Google Scholar
  40. Serpell, R. Culture’s influence on behaviour. London: Methuen, 1976.Google Scholar
  41. Spencer, H. First principles. New York: Appleton, 1864.Google Scholar
  42. Vayda, A. P. (Ed.). Environment and cultural behavior. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  43. Wintrob, R., & Sindell, P. Culture change and psychopathology: The case of Cree adolescent students in Quebec. In J. W. Berry & G. J. S. Wilde (Eds.), Social psychology: The Canadian context. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1972, pp. 259–271.Google Scholar
  44. Witkin, H. A. Social influences on the development of cognitive style. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1969, pp. 687–706.Google Scholar
  45. Witkin, H. A., & Berry, J. W. Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1975, 6, 4–87.Google Scholar
  46. Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar
  47. Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1977a, 84, 661–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. Field dependence revisited. Educational Testing Service Research Bulletin, 1977b, No. 77–17.Google Scholar
  49. Witkin, H. A., Goodenough, D., & Karp, S. Stability of cognitive style from childhood to young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 291–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Berry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanadaUSA

Personalised recommendations