Abstract
Risk is a people problem, and people have been contending with it for a very long time indeed. I extract some lessons from this historical record and explore their implications for current and future practice of risk management.
Socially relevant risk is not uncertainty of outcome, or violence of event, or toxicity of substance, or anything of the sort. Rather, it is a perceived inability to cope satisfactorily with the world around us. Improving our ability to cope is essentially a management problem: a problem of identifying and carrying out the actions which will change the rules of the game so that the game becomes more to our liking.
To cope better is to better understand the nature of risks and how they develop. It is naive and destructive to pretend that such understanding can carry with it the certainties and completeness of traditional science. Risk management lies in the realm of trans-science, of ill-structured problems, of messes. In analyzing risk messes, the central need is to evaluate, order, and structure inevitably incomplete and conflicting knowledge so that the management acts can be chosen with the best possible understanding of current knowledge, its limitations, and its implications. This requires an undertaking in policy analysis, rather than science.
One product of such analyses is a better conceptualization of “feasibility” in risk management. Past and present efforts have too often and too uncritically equated the feasible with the desirable. Results have been both frustrating and wasteful.
Another is an emphasis on the design of resilient or “soft-fail” coping strategies. The essential issue is not optimality or efficiency, but robustness to the unknowns on which actual coping performance is contingent.
The most important lesson of both experience and analysis is that societies’ abilities to cope with the unknown depend on the flexibility of their institutions and individuals, and on their capability to experiment freely with alternative forms of adaptation to the risks which threaten them.
Neither the witch hunting hysterics nor the mindlessly rigid regulations characterizing so much of our present chapter in the history of risk management say much for our ability to learn from the past.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. R. Trevor-Roper, The European Witch Craze of the 16th and 17th Centuries and Other Essays, Harper and Row, New York, 1968.
M. Harris, Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches, Vintage, New York, 1974.
H. P. Duerr, Traumzeit: uber die Grenze zwischen Wildnis und Zivilisation, Syndicat, Frankfurt am Main, 1978.
M. Summers, Malleus Maleficarum (trans.), London, 1928.
A. Wildavsky, “No Risk is the Highest Risk of All,” American Scientist, 67:32–37, 1979.
R. W. Kates, ed., Managing Technological Hazard, Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, 1978.
K. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge Keegan Paul, London, 1963.
P. Feyeraband, Against Method, New Left Books, London, 1975.
T. S. Kuhn, “ Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-23, 1970.
E. W. Lawless, Technology and Social Shock, Rutgers University Press, 1977. 1974.
C. S. Holling, C. J. Walters, and D. Ludwig, “Surprise in Resource and Environmental Management,” unpublished manuscript, 1979.
C. S. Holling, ed., Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1978.
I. Burton, R. W. Kates, and G. F. White, The Environment as Hazard, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1978.
I. Burton, R. W. Kates, and G. F. White, The Human Ecology of Extreme Geophysical Events, University of Toronto, Department of Geography, Natural Hazards Working Paper 1, 1968.
R. W. Kates, et al., “Human Impact of the Managua Earthquake,” Science, 182: 981–989, 1973.
R. A. Rappoport, Pigs for Ancestors, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1968.
M. Sahlins, Stone Age Economics, Aldine, Chicago, 1972.
G. F. White, et al., Changes in Urban Occupance of Flood Plains in the United States, University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Working Paper 57, 1958.
D. Pimentel, et al., “Pesticides, Insects in Foods, and Cosmetic Standards,” BioScience, 27: 178–185, 1977.
W. C. Clark, D. D. Jones, and C. S. Holling, “Lessons for Ecological Policy Design: A Case Study of Ecosystem Management,” Ecological Modelling, 7:1-53.
W. H. McNeill, Plagues and Peoples, Anchor Press, Garden City, 1976.
C. S. Holling, “Forest Insects, Forest Fires, and Resilience,” in Fire Regimes and Ecosystem Properties, H. A. Mooney, J. M. Bonnicksen, N. L. Christensen, J. E. Lotan, and W. A. Reiners, eds., USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, Washington, D.C., in press.
National Academy of Science (USA), Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops, NAS, Washington, 1972.
L. M. Branscomb, “Science in the White House: A New Slant,” Science, 196: 848–852, 1977.
National Academy of Science, How Safe is Safe? The Design of Policy on Drugs and Food Additives, NAS, Washington, B.C., 1974.
W. M. Wardell and L. Lasagna, Regulation and Drug Development, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C., 1975.
W. M. Wardell, “The Drug Lag Revisited,” in Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics, 24: 499–524, 1978.
L. G. Schifin and J. R. Tayan, “The Drug Lag: An Interpretive Review of the Literature,” International Journal of Health Services, 7: 359–381, 1977.
S. Peltzman, Regulation of Pharmaceutical Innovation: The 1962 Amendments, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C., 1974.
J. S. Turner, “A Consumer’s Viewpoint,” in [25] 13-22.
J. Lederberg, “A Systems-Analytic Viewpoint,” in [25] 66-94.
R. G. Noll, “Breaking Out of the Regulatory Dilemma: Alternatives to the Sterile Choice,” Indiana Law Journal, 51: 686–699, 1976.
F. R. Stockton, The Lady or the Tiger and Other Stories, Schribner’s, New York, 1884.
W. C. Clark, “Managing the Unknown,” in R. W. Kates, ed., Managing Technological Hazard, Inst. Behav. Sci., Colorado, 109-142, 1977.
W. Haefele, “Hypotheticality and the New Challenges: The Pathfinder Role of Nuclear Energy” Minerva, 10: 303–323, 1974.
D. D. Hester and J. Tobin, eds., Risk Aversion and Portfolio Choice, Cowles Foundation Monograph 19, New Haven, 1957.
P. F. Drucker, Management, Harper and Row, New York, 125, 1973.
R. Dubos, quoted in W. C. Wescoe, “A Producer’s Viewpoint,” in [25] 28.
J. W. Gardner, The Recovery of Confidence, W. W. Norton, New York, 1970.
P. B. Hutt, “A Regulator’s Viewpoint,” in [25] 116-131.
C. E. Lindblom, Politics and Markets, Basic Books, New York, 1977.
C. E. Lindblom and D. K. Cohen, Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1979.
A.M. Weinberg, “Science and Trans-science,” Minerva, 10: 209–222, 1972.
P. Feyerabend, Science in a Free Society, New Left Books, London, 1978.
J. R. Ravetz, Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971.
C. Comar, “Bad Science and Social Penalties,” Science, 200: 1225, 1978.
H. Brooks, “Expertise and Politics: Problems and Tensions,” Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 119: 257–261, 1975.
D. Nelkin, “The Political Impact of Technical Expertise,” Social Studies of Science, 5: 35–54, 1975.
L. Branscomb, ed., Science, Technology, and Society. A Prospective Look, National Academy of Science, Washington, D. C, 1976.
A. Kantrowitz, “The Science Court Experiment: Criticisms and Responses,” Bull. Atom. Sci., 33: 43–50, 1977.
M. G. Morgan, “Bad Science and Good Policy Analysis,” Science, 201: 971, 1978.
G. Majone, “The Uses of Policy Analysis,” Russell Sage Foundation Annual Report for 1977, 201-220, 1977.
A. Wildavsky, Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Little Brown Co., Boston, 1979.
C. E. Lindblom, The Policy Making Process, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, New York, 1979.
E. S. Quade, Analysis for Public Decisions, Elsevier, New York, 1975.
K. E. Weick, The Social Psychology of Organizing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1969s.
A. Alchian, “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory,” J. Pol. Econ. 1950: 211–221, 1950.
I. Lakatos, “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction,” in R. Buck and R. Cohen, eds., Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8: 92–122, 1971.
M. Crozier, The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1964.
D. N. Michael, On Learning to Plan — and Planning to Learn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1978.
G. Majone, “Process and Outcome in Regulatory Decision-Making,” Amer. Behav. Sci., 22: 561–583, 1979.
G. Majone, “Standard Setting and the Theory of Institutional Choice,” Policy and Politics, 5: 35–50, 1977.
G. Majone, “Technology Assessment in a Dialectic Key,” Int. Inst. Applied Systems Analysis PP-77-1, Laxenberg, Austria, 1977.
D. B. Straus, “Managing Complexity: A New Look at Environmental Mediation,” Envir. Sci. Technol., 13: 661–665, 1979.
N. E. Abrams and R. S. Berry, “Mediation: A Better Alternative to Science Courts,” Bull. Atom. Sci., 33: 50–53, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark, W.C. (1980). Witches, Floods, and Wonder Drugs: Historical Perspectives on Risk Management. In: Schwing, R.C., Albers, W.A. (eds) Societal Risk Assessment. General Motors Research Laboratories. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0447-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0445-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive