The Justice of Distributing Scarce and Abundant Resources

  • Jerald Greenberg
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)

Abstract

Questions as to the fairest way of allocating resources arise in all social activities, and the way these ubiquitious questions are answered can have critical, widereaching impact on the individuals concerned and on society in general. The profundity of such questions comes into clear focus when the supply of resources in question is inadequate to meet all claims. Examples range from seemingly ordinary matters of allocating journal pages to authors (Latané, 1979) or deciding which little leaguers will get to play baseball, through more far-reaching concerns of how gasoline will be rationed (Pauly & Walcott, 1979) or whether veterans should be given preferences for civil service hiring (Labich, LaBrecque, & Camper, 1979). Consider also the tragic choices of who will be drafted into the armed services (U.S. National Advisory Commission on Selective Service, 1967), which women should bear children (Berelson, 1974), or who will be given access to hemodialysis machines and other scarce medical resources (Katz, 1973; “Scarce Medical Resources,” 1969).

Keywords

Scarce Resource Distributive Justice Relative Deprivation Abundant Resource Experimental Social Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. S. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  2. Barraclough, G. The haves and the have nots. New York Review of Books, May 13, 1976, pp. 31-41.Google Scholar
  3. Barteil, T. Political orientations and public response to the energy crisis. Social Science Quarterly, 1976, 57, 430–436.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 1965, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berelson, B. (Ed.). Population policy in developed countries. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Anderson, B., & Cohen, B. P. Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status-value formulation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress, Vol. 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. Blau, P. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. Borgstrom, G. Overfed, wasteful, we live in a luxury oasis and risk a third world war. Detroit Free Press Magazine, September 21, 1975, pp. 26-32.Google Scholar
  9. Bowie, N. E. Towards a new theory of distributive justice. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Bowie, N. E., & Simon, R. L. The individual and the political order. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, L. Rich countries and poor in a finite, interdependent world. Daedalus, 1973, 102, 153–164.Google Scholar
  13. Burgess, R. L., & Nielsen, J. M. An experimental analysis of some structural determinants of equitable and inequitable exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 1974, 39, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cahn, E. The moral decision. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  15. Calabresi, G., & Bobbitt, P. Tragic choices. New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, R. D., III, & Word, L. E. Where is the apathetic bystander? Situational characteristics of the emergency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook, K. S., & Parcel, T. L. Equity theory: Directions for future research. Sociological Inquiry, 1977, 47, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coon, R. C., Lane, I. M., & Lichtman, R. J. Sufficiency of reward and allocation behavior. Human Development, 1974, 17, 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crosby, F. A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 1976, 83, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deutsch, M. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckhoff, T. Justice: Its determinants in social interaction. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  22. Ehrlich, P. R. The population bomb. New York: Ballantine, 1968.Google Scholar
  23. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. The end of affluence. New York: Ballantine, 1974.Google Scholar
  24. Ferber, S. Energy research: Coming in from the cold. APA Monitor, March 1977, pp. 4-5.Google Scholar
  25. Foster, G. Peasant society and the image of the limited good. American Anthropologist, 1965, 67, 296–311.Google Scholar
  26. Fraker, S., & Cook, W. J. San Francisco: Going dry. Newsweek, April 18, 1977, p. 32. Fuel cutbacks discounted. New Orleans Times-Picayune, March 4, 1979, Sec. 1, p. 3.Google Scholar
  27. Greenberg, J. Effects of reward value and retaliative power on allocation decisions: Justice, generosity, or greed? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenberg, J. Group vs individual allocation decisions: Is there a polarization effect? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1979, 15, 504–512. (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenberg, J. Protestant ethic endorsement and the fairness of equity inputs. Journal of Research in Personality, 1979, 13, 81–90. (b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenberg, J. Scarcity and the distributive fairness of natural resource allocations. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, New Orleans, March 1979. (c).Google Scholar
  31. Gudeman, S. Anthropological economics: The question of distribution. In B. J. Siegel, A. R. Beals, & S. A. Tyler (Eds.), Annual review of anthropology, Vol. 7. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc., 1978.Google Scholar
  32. Halévy, E. The growth of philosophic radicalism (M. Morriss, trans.). London: Faber and Gwyer, 1928.Google Scholar
  33. Hardin, G. Lifeboat ethics: The case against helping the poor. Psychology Today, September 1974, pp. 38, 40-13, 123-124, 126.Google Scholar
  34. Hillis, J. W., & Wortman, C. B. Some determinants of public acceptance of randomized control group experimental designs. Sociometry, 1976, 39, 91–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Homans, G. C. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1961.Google Scholar
  36. Hospers, J. Human conduct. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1961.Google Scholar
  37. Hume, D. A treatise of human nature. In T. H. Green & T. H. Grose (Eds.), David Hume: The philosophical works, Vol. 2. London: Scientia Verlag Allen, 1964. (Originally published 1740.).Google Scholar
  38. Kahn, H., Brown, W., & Martel, L. The next 200 years. New York: William Morrow, 1976.Google Scholar
  39. Karsh, B., & Cole, R. E. Industrialization and the convergence hypothesis: Some aspects of contemporary Japan. Journal of Social Issues, 1968, 24, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Karuza, J., & Leventhal, G. S. Justice judgments: Role demands and perception of fairness. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, September 1976.Google Scholar
  41. Katz, A. Process design for selection of hemodialysis and organ transplant recipients. Buffalo Law Review, 1973, 22, 373, 402-403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Katz, M. G., & Messe, L. A. A sex difference in the distribution of rewards. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, May 1973.Google Scholar
  43. Komorita, S. S., & Kravitz, D. A. The effects of alternatives in bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1979, 15, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Labich, K., LaBrecque, R., & Camper, D. Women vs. veterans. Newsweek, March 5, 1979, p. 59.Google Scholar
  45. Lamm, H., & Myers, D. G. Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 11. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  46. Landau, S. B., & Leventhal, G. S. A simulation study of administrators’ behavior toward employees who receive job offers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1976, 6, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lane, I. M., & Messé, L. A. Distribution of insufficient, sufficient, and oversufficient rewards: A clarification of equity theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 21, 228–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Latané, B. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Problem, perspective, prospect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, 5, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lenski, G. E. Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
  50. Lerner, M. J. Social psychology of justice and interpersonal attraction. In T. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  51. Leventhal, G. S. The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press, 1976. (a).Google Scholar
  52. Leventhal, G. S. Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1976. (b).Google Scholar
  53. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation pReferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
  54. Leventhal, G. S., & Michaels, J. W. Locus of cause and equity motivation as determinants of reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leventhal, G. S., & Weiss, T. Perceived need and the response to inequitable distributions of reward. Unpublished manuscript, Wayne State University, 1975.Google Scholar
  56. Leventhal, G. S., Weiss, T., & Buttrick, R. Attribution of value, equity, and the prevention of waste in reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 27, 276–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lewicki, R. J., Bowen, D. D., Hall, D. T., & Hall, F. S. Experiences in management and organizational behavior: Instructor’s manual. Chicago: St. Clair, 1975.Google Scholar
  58. Lewis, S. A., & Leventhal, G. S. Some determinants of professors’ and lawyers’ preference for merit pay: A test of the justice judgment model. Unpublished manuscript, Wayne State University, 1976.Google Scholar
  59. MacDonald, A. P. More on the Protestant ethic. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972, 39, 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Major, B., & Deaux, K. Individual differences in equity behavior. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  61. Mill, J. S. Utilitarianism. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1957.Google Scholar
  62. Mirels, H. L., & Garrett, J. B. The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 36, 40–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Moore, B., Jr. Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. White Plains, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1978.Google Scholar
  64. Morrison, D. E. Growth, environment, equity and scarcity. Social Science Quarterly, 1976, 57, 292–306.Google Scholar
  65. Parke, R. J., & Glick, P. C. Prospective changes in marriage and the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1967, 29, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pauly, D., & Walcott, J. Plans for the pinch. Newsweek, January 19, 1979, p. 25.Google Scholar
  67. Perez, C. A. The president of Venezuela responds to the president of the United States. New York Times, September 18, 1974, p. 19s.Google Scholar
  68. Rainwater, L. What money buys: Inequality and the social meanings of income. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
  69. Rescher, N. Distributive justice. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.Google Scholar
  70. Ross, W. D. Foundations of ethics. London: Oxford University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
  71. Roszak, B., & Roszak, T. (Eds.). Masculine-feminine: Readings in sexual mythology and the liberation of women. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.Google Scholar
  72. Runciman, W. G. Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar
  73. Ryan, J. A. Distributive justice. New York: Macmillan, 1942.Google Scholar
  74. Saks, M. J. Social psychological contributions to a legislative subcommittee on organ and tissue transplants. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 680–690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Scanzoni, J. Sexual bargaining: Power politics in the American marriage. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
  76. Scarce medical resources. Columbia Law Review, 1969, 69, 620, 639-654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schwartz, B. Queuing and waiting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  78. Schwartz, S. H., & Clausen, G. T. Responsibility, norms, and helping in an emergency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Singer, P. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1972, 1, 222–243.Google Scholar
  80. Singer, P. Democracy and disobedience. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  81. Smith, H. The Russians. New York: Quadrangle, 1976.Google Scholar
  82. Smith, J. N. (Ed.). Environmental quality and social justice in America. Washington: The Conservation Foundation, 1974.Google Scholar
  83. Thomas, R. D., & Baker, K. G. A growth and developmental model for water resource policy. Social Science Quarterly, 1976, 57, 445–454.Google Scholar
  84. Törnblom, K. J. Distributive justice: Typology and propositions. Human Relations, 1977, 30, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tyler, G. Scarcity. New York: Quadrangle, 1976.Google Scholar
  86. U.S. National Advisory Commission on Selective Service. In pursuit of equity: Who serves when not all serve. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967.Google Scholar
  87. Veblen, T. The theory of the leisure class. New York: Macmillan, 1899.Google Scholar
  88. Wallich, H. C. Gasoline rationing. Newsweek, December 24, 1973, p. 112s.Google Scholar
  89. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerald Greenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations