The Exchange Process in Close Relationships

Microbehavior and Macromotives
  • John G. Holmes
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)

Abstract

Following years of apparent neglect, the study of close relationships is emerging as an important focus for social psychologists. Until a decade ago, research on the topic was typically confined to identifying predictors of marital harmony or discord (cf. Barry, 1970). The demographic characteristics of couples, such as education, status, and family background, were examined in order to portray relationships that were “at risk.” The large majority of studies used either self-ratings of satisfaction or divorce rates as reflections of troubled relationships. With the noteworthy exception of Levinger’s contribution (see Levinger & Snoek, 1972), the research was marked by a lack of concern with considerations of both process and theory. Recent contributions have demonstrated an interest in the theoretical development of models of intimate exchange and “pair cohesiveness” (e.g., Kelley, 1979; Moles & Levinger, 1976), though evidence of an emphasis on the process of conflict and estrangement is meagre (e.g., Hill, Rubin, & Peplau, 1976; Kelley, 1979; Passer, Kelley, & Michela, 1978).

Keywords

Time Perspective Address Frame Fair Exchange Interpersonal Attraction Resource Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry, W. A. Marriage research and conflict: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 73, 41–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berscheid, E. and Walster, E. Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. Berscheid, E., Walster, E., and Bohrnstedt, G. The body image report. Psychology Today, 1973, 7, 119–131.Google Scholar
  4. Birchler, G. R., Weiss, R. L., & Vincent, J. P. Multimethod analysis of social reinforcement exchange between maritally distressed and nondistressed spouse and stranger dyads. journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, P. M. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deutsch, M. The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. Deutsch, M. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dion, K. L., & Dion, K. K. Love, liking and trust in heterosexual relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erickson, B., Holmes, J. G., Frey, R., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. W. Functions of a third party in the resolution of conflict: The role of a judge in pretrail conferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1974.Google Scholar
  13. Gottman, J., Notarius, C., Markman, H., Bank, S., Yoppi, B., & Rubin, M. E. Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A. Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holmes, J. G., & Miller, D. T. Interpersonal conflict. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1976, pp. 265–308.Google Scholar
  17. Howard, J. W., & Dawes, R. M. Linear prediction of marital happiness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 478–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huesmann, L. R. and Levinger, G. Incremental exchange theory: A formal model for progression in dyadic social interaction. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  19. Kelley, H. H. A classroom study of the dilemmas in interpersonal negotiations. In K. Archibald (Ed.), Strategic interaction and conflict. Berkeley: Berkeley University of California Press, 1966, pp. 49–73.Google Scholar
  20. Kelley, H. H. Personal relations: Their structure and process. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  21. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. Jnterpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Lederer, W. J., & Jackson, D. D. The mirages of marriage. New York: Norton, 1968.Google Scholar
  23. Lerner, M. J. The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origin and forms. Journal of Personality, 1977, 45, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press, 1976, pp. 134–162.Google Scholar
  25. Lerner, M. J., & Whitehead, L. Procedural justice viewed in the context of justice motive theory. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Social Justice. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
  26. Levinger, G. A social psychological perspective on marriage dissolution. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levinger, G., & Snoek, J. D. Attraction in relationships: A new look at interpersonal attraction. Morristown, N. J.: General Learning Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  28. Moles, O. C., & Levinger, G. (Eds.) Divorce and separation. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orvis, B. R., Kelley, H. H., & Butler, D. Attriburional conflict in young couples. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. E. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1976, pp. 353–386.Google Scholar
  30. Passer, M. W., Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. Multidimensional scaling of the causes for negative interpersonal behavior, journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 951–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patterson, G. R., & Hops, H. Coercion, a game for two: Intervention techniques for marital conflict. In R. E. Ulrich & P. Mountjoy (Eds.), The experimental analysis of social behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.Google Scholar
  32. Platt, J. Social traps. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pruitt, D. G. Methods for resolving differences of interest: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raush, H. L., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., and Swain, M. A. Communication, Conflict and Marriage. Washington: Jossey-Bass, 1974.Google Scholar
  35. Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rubin, Z. Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  37. Schelling, T. C. Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. Effects of salience of extrinsic rewards on liking and loving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thibaut, J. W., & Faucheux, C. The development of contractual norms in a bargaining situation under two types of stress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
  41. Turner, J. L., Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. Interpersonal reinforcers: Classification, interrelationship and some differential properties. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.Google Scholar
  43. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupmann, J. Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • John G. Holmes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations