Advertisement

Ionic Conductivities in Gastric Mucosa under Osmotic Gradients

  • Leopoldo Villegas

Abstract

The effect of osmotic gradients on the transmucosal ionic conductance, intracellular potential and the serosal-to-mucosal conductivity ratios of the ephitelial and oxyntic cells were explored. Transmucosal and intracellular potentials as well as the changes produced by transmucosal 0.1 mA/cm2, 1 sec, current pulses were measured. In 10−4 M histamine-stimulated mucosae the transmucosal conductance is significantly (P < 0.001) reduced from 3.73 ± 0.09 mmohs/cm2 obtained with isosmotic (231 mOsm/Kg of water) solutions at both surfaces to 3.17 ± 0.05 mmohs/cm2 by using hyperosmotic (508 mOsm/Kg of water) solution at the mucosal surface. Simultaneously, the transmucosal electrical potential difference referred to the serosal surface significantly increases (P < 0.001) from −23.3 ± 0.5 mV to −26.6 ± 0.5 mV by effect of hyperosmotic solution at the mucosal surface. No significant changes (P > 0.05) in the short circuit current, the serosal-to-mucosal conductivity ratios of ephitelial and oxyntic cells and the intracellular potentials were produced by the use of hyperosmotic solution at the mucosal surface. These results suggest the possibility that hypertonicity at the mucosal surface affects mainly the paracellular pathway and in a less extent the transcellular pathway for diffusion.

Keywords

Gastric Mucosa Mucosal Surface Acidic Fraction Conductivity Ratio Osmotic Gradient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Durbin, R.P., 1981. Osmosis in Ephitelial Membranes, J. Membrane Biol., 61: 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hellander, H.F., 1977. An attempt to correlate functional and morphological data for the gastric parietal cells, Gastroenterology, 73: 956–957.Google Scholar
  3. Hellander, H.F., and R.P. Durbin, 1977. Secretory surface area and phosphatase activity of frog gastric mucosa. Am.J. Physiol., 232: E48 - E52.Google Scholar
  4. Hill, A., 1980. Salt-Water Coupling in Leaky Ephitelia, J. Membrane Biol., 56: 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hogben, C.A.M., 1955. Active transport of chloride by isolated frog gastric ephitelium. Origin of the gastric mucosal potential, Am.J. Physiol. 180: 641–649.Google Scholar
  6. Ito, S., 1967. Anatomic structure of the gastric mucosa. Handbook of Physiology, Ed.: C.F. Code. American Physiological Society, Washington Section 6, Vol. 2, p. 705–741.Google Scholar
  7. Sedar, A.W., and J.Q. Forte, 1964. Effects of calcium depletion on the junctional complex between oxyntic cells of gastric glands. J.Cell. Biol., 22: 173–188.Google Scholar
  8. Villegas, L., 1962. Cellular location of the electrical potential difference in frog gastric mucosa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 64: 359–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Villegas, L., 1975. Response of active transport of ions and spontaneous water flux to osmotic gradients in gastric mucosa. Am. J. Physiol., 228: 738–741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Villegas, L., 1982. Water diffusion under osmotic gradients in frog gastric mucosa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 685: 249–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Villegas, L., F. Michelangeli, and L. Sananes, 1970. Asymmetrical response of oxyntic cells to direct current in non-stimulated frog gastric mucosa, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 219: 518–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leopoldo Villegas
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Biofísica y BioquímicaInstituto Venezolano de Investigaciones CientíficasCaracasVenezuela

Personalised recommendations