Advertisement

Gender and Reproductive State Correlates of Taste Perception in Humans

  • Richard L. Doty

Abstract

It is well documented that numerous physiological and psychological processes of mammals are directly or indirectly related to circulating levels of reproductive hormones (e.g., Beach, 1947; Brobeck, Wheatland, and Stominger, 1947; Carr, Loeb, and Dissinger, 1965; Crocker, 1971; Doty, 1972; Komisaruk, Adler, and Hutchison, 1974; Pietras and Moulton, 1974). In humans, such relations are perhaps most clearly exemplified by studies undertaken during various phases of the menstrual cycle. A representative sample of variables which reportedly change systematically across these phases includes body temperature, blood pressure, respiratory efficiency, hemolysis, lymphocytosis, serum albumin, serum globulin, carbohydrate tolerance, urine volume, mucus consistency, immune reactivity, salt retention, circulating vitamin levels, depression, anxiety, and elation (see review by Southam and Gonzaga, 1965). Although a number of the studies reporting such fluctuations can be faulted on methodological grounds, the evidence for general metabolic and physiologic influences of gonadal hormones in humans is overwhelming. This evidence, along with anecdotal reports of changes in smell and taste perception during periods of heightened endocrine output, such as pregnancy, lend credence to the hypothesis that human sensory processes may be significantly affected by the level of reproductive hormones.

Keywords

Menstrual Cycle Human Reproduction Taste Preference Menstrual Cycle Phase Taste Perception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaron, M. Effect of menstrual cycle on subjective ratings of sweetness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975, 40, 974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, E. H. S., and Nichols, E. L. On the sense of taste. Science, 1888, 11, 145–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, E. H. S., and Nichols, E. L. The delicacy of the sense of taste. Nature, 1888, 37, 557–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baravelli, P. Le alterazioni della sensibilita gustativa nella gravidanza. Rivista Italiana di Ginecologia, 1961, 45, 171–188.Google Scholar
  5. Bartoshuk, L. M. NaCl thresholds in man: Thresholds for water taste or NaCl taste? Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974, 87, 310–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beach, F. A. A review of physiological and psychological studies of sexual behavior in mammals. Physiological Reviews, 1947, 27, 240–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beiguelman, B. Taste sensitivity to phenylthiourea and menstruation. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Rome), 1964, 13, 197–199.Google Scholar
  8. Bell, C. Sexual modification of cardiovascular regulation. In: M. Sandler and G. L. Gessa (Eds.), Sexual behavior: Pharmacology and biochemistry. New York: Raven Press, 1975, pp. 241–246.Google Scholar
  9. Blakeslee, A. F., and Salmon, M. R. Odor and taste blindness. Eugenics, 1931, 16, 105–109.Google Scholar
  10. Brobeck, J. R., Wheatland, M., and Stominger, J. L. Variations in regulation of energy exchange associated with estrus, diestrus, and pseudopregnancy in rats. Endocrinology, 1947, 40,65–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne, D., Golightly, C., and Capaldi, E. J. Construction and validation of the food attitude scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1963, 27, 215–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabanac, M. Physiological role of pleasure. Science, 1971, 173, 1103–1107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cabanac, M., and Duclaux, R. Obesity in absence of satiety aversion to sucrose. Science, 1970, 168, 486–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cabanac, M., Minaire, Y., and Adair, E. R. Influence of internal factors on the pleasantness of a gustative sweet sensation. Communications in Behavioral Biology, 1968, Part A, 1, 77–82.Google Scholar
  15. Carr, W. J., Loeb, L. S., and Dissinger, M. L. Responses of rats to sex odors. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965, 59, 370–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Bodmer, W. F. The genetics of human populations. San Francisco: Freeman, 1971, p. 122.Google Scholar
  17. Chapman, C. R., Murphy, T. M., and Butler, S. H. Analgesic strength of 33 percent nitrous oxide: A signal detection theory evaluation. Science, 1973, 179, 1246–1248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, W. C. The psyche in psychophysics: A sensory-decision theory analysis of the effect of instructions on flicker sensitivity and response bias. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 65, 358–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coats, A. C. Effects of age, sex, and smoking on electrical taste threshold. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 1974, 83, 365–369.Google Scholar
  20. Crocker, A. D. Variations in mucosal water and sodium transfer associated with the rat estrous cycle. Journal of Physiology, 1971, 214, 257–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. DeMarchi, G. W., and Tong, J. E. Menstrual, diurnal, and activation effects on the resolution of temporally paired flashes. Psychophysiology, 1972, 9, 362–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Desor, J. A., Greene, L. S., and Mailer, O. Preferences for sweet and salty in 9 to 15 year-old and adult humans. Science, 1975, 190, 686–687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Desor, J. A., Mailer, O., and Andrews, K. Ingestive responses of human newborns to salty, sour and bitter stimuli. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975, 89, 966–970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dickens, G., and Trethowan, W. H. Cravings and aversions during pregnancy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1971, 15, 259–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doty, R. L. Odor preferences of female Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi for male mouse odors of P. m. bairdi and P. leucopus noveboracensis as a function of estrous state. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1912, 81, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doty, R. L. Reproductive endocrine influences upon human nasal chemoreception: A review. In R. L. Doty (Ed.), Mammalian olfaction, reproductive processes and behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1976, pp. 295–321.Google Scholar
  27. Doty, R. L. Food preference ratings of congenitally anosmic humans. In M. R. Kare and O. Mailer (Eds.), The chemical senses and nutrition II. New York: Academic Press, 1977, pp. 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Doty, R. L., and Silverthorne, C. Influence of menstrual cycle on volunteering behaviour. Nature (London), 1915, 254, 139–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dubignon, J., Cambell, D., Curtis, M., and Parrington, M. The relation between laboratory measures of sucking, food intake, and perinatal factors during the newborn period. Child Development, 1969, 40, 1107–1120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Engen, T. Olfactory psychophysics. In L. M. Beidler (Ed), Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. 4, Chemical senses. I. Olfaction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1971, pp. 216–244.Google Scholar
  31. Engen, T. Psychophysics I. Discrimination and detection. In J. W. Kling and L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth & Schlosberg’s experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1972, pp. 11–46.Google Scholar
  32. Ericson, S. The parotid gland in subjects with and without rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Radiologica, 1968, Suppl. 275, 1–167.Google Scholar
  33. Ericson, S. The variability of the human parotid flow rate on stimulation with citric acid, with special reference to taste. Archives of Oral Biology, 1971, 16, 9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Falconer, D. S. Sensory thresholds for solutions of phenyl thiocarbamide: Results of tests on a large sample made by R. A. Fisher. Annals of Eugenics (Cambridge), 1947, 13, 211–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fergenson, P. E., Moss, S., Dzendolet, E., Sawyer, F. M., and Moore, J. W. The effect of signal probability, food intake, sex, and smoking on gustation, as measured by the theory of signal detection. Journal of General Psychology, 1975, 92, 109–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fischer, R. In discussion following R. I. Henkin, abnormalities of taste and olfaction in various disease states. In M. R. Kare and O. Mailer (Eds.), The chemical senses and nutrition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967, p. 111.Google Scholar
  37. Fischer, R., Griffin, F., England, S., and Garn, S. Taste thresholds and food dislikes. Nature (London), 1961, 191, 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fischer, R., Griffin, F., and Kaplan, A. R. Taste thresholds, cigarette smoking and food dis likes. Mediana Experimentalis, 1963, 9, 151–167.Google Scholar
  39. Fornasari, G. Variazioni della soglia gustativa in donne con ciclo menstruale normale. Bolletino della Malattie dell Orecchio, della Gola, del Naso, 1951, 69, 139–147.Google Scholar
  40. Fortin, J. N., Wittkower, E. D., and Kalz, F. A psychosomatic approach to the pre-menstrual tension syndrome: A preliminary report. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1958, 79, 978–981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Giles, A. The longings of pregnant women. Transactions of the Obstetrics Society, 1893, 35, 242–249.Google Scholar
  42. Giudizi, S., and Foferi, G. Le variazioni della sensibilita gustativa in particolari situazioni fisiologiche ed in alcuni stati morbosi. Rivista de Clinica Medica, 1946, 46, 78–88.Google Scholar
  43. Glanville, E. V., and Kaplan, A. R. The menstrual cycle and sensitivity of taste perception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1965, 92, 189–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Glanville, E. V., Kaplan, A. R., and Fischer, R. Age, sex and taste sensitivity. Journal of Gerontology, 1964, 19, 474–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  46. Greene, L. S. Physical growth and development, neurological maturation, and behavioral functioning in two Ecuadorian Andean communities in which goiter is endemic. American Journal of Physical A nthropology, 1974, 41, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Greene, L. S., Desor, J. A., and Mailer, O. Heredity and experience: Their relative importance in the development of taste preference in man. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975, 89, 279–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grinker, J. A., Price, J. M., and Greenwood, M. R. C. Studies of taste in childhood obesity. In D. Novin, W. Wyrwicka, and G. Bray (Eds.), Hunger: Basic mechanisms and clinical implications. New York: Ravin Press, 1976, pp. 441–457.Google Scholar
  49. Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.Google Scholar
  50. Hansen, R., and Glass, L. Über den Geruchssin in der Schwangerschaft. Klinische Wochenschrift, 1936, 15, 891–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hansen, R., and Langer, W. Über Geschmacksveranderungen in der Schwangerschaft. Klinische Wochenschrift, 1935, 14, 1173–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harris, H., and Kalmus, H. The measurement of taste sensitivity to phenylthiourea (P.T.C.). Annals of Eugenics (Cambridge), 1949, 15, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hawel, W., and Wirths, W. Untersuchen psychologischer Variablen bei Männern und Frauen während vierzehn Tage dauern dem Aufenthalt in Schutzraumen. Psychologie und Praxis, 1969, 13, 19–32.Google Scholar
  54. Henkin, R. I. Sensory changes during the menstrual cycle. In M. Ferin, F. Halberg, R. M. Richart, and R. L. Vande Wiele (Eds.), Biorhythms and human reproduction. New York: Wiley, 1974, pp. 277–285.Google Scholar
  55. Hoshishima, K. Endocrines and taste. In M. R. Kare and O. Mailer (Eds.), The chemical senses and nutrition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967, pp. 139–153.Google Scholar
  56. Jørgensen, M. B., and Buch, N. H. Sense of smell and taste in pregnant diabetics: Clinical studies. Practica-Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica, 1961, 23, 390–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Kahn, R. J. Sensory threshold fluctuations as a function of the menstrual cycle. Doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, 1965, No. 65–11, 128 pp.Google Scholar
  58. Kalmus, H., and Trotter, W. R. Direct assessment of the effect of age on P.T.C. sensitivity. Annals of Human Genetics, 1962, 26, 145–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kaplan, A. R., and Fischer, R. Taste sensitivity for bitterness: Some biological and clinical implications. In W. Wortis (Ed.), Recent advances in biological psychiatry, Vol. VII. New York: Plenum Press, 1965, pp. 183–196.Google Scholar
  60. Kaplan, A. R., Glanville, E. V., and Fischer, R. Taste thresholds for bitterness and cigarette smoking. Nature (London), 1964, 202, 1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kaplan, A. R., Glanville, E. V., and Fischer, R. Cumulative effect of age and smoking on taste sensitivity in males and females. Journal of Gerontology, 1965, 20, 334–337.Google Scholar
  62. Komisaruk, B. R., Adler, N. T., and Hutchison, J. Genital sensory field: Enlargement by estrogen treatment in female rats. Science, 1972, 178, 1295–1298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Köster, E. P. Human psychophysics in olfaction. In D. G. Moulton, A. Turk, and J. W. Johnston Jr. (Eds.), Methods in olfactory research. London: Academic Press, 1975, 345–374.Google Scholar
  64. Krecek, J. Sex differences in salt taste: The effect of testosterone. Physiology and Behavior, 1973, 10, 683–688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Krecek, J., Nováková, V., and Stibral, K. Sex differences in the taste preference for a salt solution in the rat. Physiology and Behavior, 1972, 8, 183–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Krut, L. H., Perrin, M. J., and Bronte-Stewart, B. Taste perception in smokers and non- smokers. British Medical Journal, 1961, 1, 384–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Laird, D. A., and Breen, W. J. Sex and age alterations in taste preference. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1959, 15, 549–550.Google Scholar
  68. Langwell, K. E. Women more sensitive to taste than the men. Frosted Foods Field, 1948, 7, 2–4.Google Scholar
  69. Langwell, K. E. Taste perception and taste preferences of the consumer. Food Technology, 1959, 3,136–139.Google Scholar
  70. Leguebe, A. Sex differences in tasting P.T.C. Life Sciences, 1963, 2, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Le Magnen, J. Les phenomenes olfacto-sexuels chez l’homme. Archives des Sciences Physiologiques, 1952, 6, 125–160.Google Scholar
  72. Linker, E., Moore, M. E., and Galanter, E. Taste thresholds, detection models, and disparate results. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 67, 59–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Luvara, A., and Maurizi, M. Ricerche di olfattometria in gravidanza. Bollettino delle Malattie dell’Orecchio, della Gola, del Naso, 1961, 79, 367–375.Google Scholar
  74. Malek, J., Gleich, J., and Maly, V. Characteristics of the daily rhythm of menstruation and labor. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1962, 98, 1042–1055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Marcus, R. L. Cravings for food in pregnancy. Manchester Medical Gazette, 1965, 44, 16–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Marks, L. E. Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  77. Mayer-Gross, W., and Walker, J. W. Taste and selection of food in hypoglycaemia. British Journal of Experimental Pathology, 1946, 27, 297–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Minich, S. K., Mountney, G. J., and Prudent, I. The effect of age and sex of panel members on taste thresholds for standard chicken broth. Food Technology, 1966, 20, 970–973.Google Scholar
  79. Mohr, J. Taste sensitivity to phenylthiourea in Denmark. Annals of Eugenics (Cambridge), 1951, 16, 282–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Moore, M. E., Linker, R., and Purcell, M. Taste sensitivity after eating: A signal detection approach. American Journal of Psychology, 1965, 78, 107–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Morton, J. H., Additon, H., Addison, R. G., Hunt, L., and Sullivan, J. J. A clinical study of premenstrual tension. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1953, 65, 1182–1185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Moskowitz, H. R. The sweetness and pleasantness of sugars. American Journal of Psychology, 1971, 84,387–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Moskowitz, H. R., Kumraiah, V., Sharma, K. N., Jacobs, H. L., and Sharma, S. D. Effects of hunger, satiety and glucose load upon taste intensity and taste hedonics. Physiology and Behavior, 1976, 16, 471–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mower, G. D., Mair, R. G., and Engen, T. Influence of internal factors on the perceived intensity and pleasantness of gustatory and olfactory stimuli. In M. R. Kare and O. Mailer (Eds.), Chemical senses and nutrition II. New York: Academic Press, 1977, pp. 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Nance, D. M., Gorski, R. A., and Panksepp, J. Neural and hormonal determinants of sex differences in food intake and body weight. In D. Novin, W. Wyrwicka, and G. Bray (Eds.), Hunger: Basic mechanisms and clinical implications. New York: Raven Press, 1976, pp. 257–271.Google Scholar
  86. Nisbett, R. E., and Gurwitz, S. B. Weight, sex, and the eating behavior of human newborns. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970, 73, 245–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Noferi, G., and Giudizi, S. Le variazioni della sensibilita gustativa in particolari situazioni fisiologiche ed in alcuni stati morbosi. Nota IV. Le variazioni della soglia gustativa per l’acido e della soglia olfattiva per Podore limone durate la gravidanza. Rivista di Clinica Medica (Supp. 1, Marginalia Otolaryngologica), 1946, 5, 89–100.Google Scholar
  88. O’Mahony, M. Salt taste sensitivity: A signal detection approach. Perception, 1972a, 1, 459–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. O’Mahony, M. The interstimulus interval for taste: 1. The efficiency of expectoration and mouthrinsing in clearing the mouth of salt residuals. Perception, 1972b, 1, 209–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Orne, M. T. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 776–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Panebianco, G. Le variazioni della sensibilita gustativa in gravidanza. Valsalva, 1950, 26, 306–313.Google Scholar
  92. Pangborn, R. M. Influence of hunger on sweetness preferences and taste thresholds. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1959, 7, 280–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Pangborn, R. M. In discussion following K. Hoshishima, endocrines and taste. In M. R. Kare and O. Mailer (Eds.), The chemical senses and nutrition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967, p. 149.Google Scholar
  94. Pangborn, R. M., and Simone, M. Body size and sweetness preference. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1958, 34, 924–928.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Pfaffman, C., Bartoshuk, L. M., and McBurney, D. H. Taste psychophysics. In L. M. Beidler (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol. IV, Chemical senses 2: Taste. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1971, pp. 75–101.Google Scholar
  96. Pietras, R. J., and Moulton, D. G. Hormonal influences on odor detection in rats: Changes associated with the estrous cycle, pseudopregnancy, ovariectomy, and administration of testosterone propionate. Physiology and Behavior, 1974, 12, 475–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Posner, L. B., McCottrey, C. M., and Posner, A. C. Pregnancy craving and pica. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1957, 9, 270–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Price, R. H. Signal detection methods in personality and perception. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 55–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pursell, E. D., Sanders, R. E., and Haude, R. H. Sensitivity to sucrose in smokers and non-smokers: A comparison of TSD and percent correct measures. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Richter, C. P., and MacLean, A. Salt taste threshold of humans. American Journal of Physiology, 1939, 126, 1–6.Google Scholar
  101. Simone, M., Leonard, S., Hinreiner, E., and Valdes, R. M. Consumer studies on sweetness of canned cling peaches. Food Technology, 1956, 10, 279–282.Google Scholar
  102. Smith, W. I., Powell, E. K., and Ross, S. Food aversions: Some additional personality correlates. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1955a, 19, 145–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Smith, W., Powell, E. K., and Ross, S. Manifest anxiety and food aversions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955b, 50, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Southam, A. L., and Gonzaga, F. P. Systemic changes during the menstrual cycle. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1965, 97, 142–165.Google Scholar
  105. Stevens, S.S. Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural and social prospects. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  106. Stevenson, H. W., and Allen, S. Adult performance as a function of sex of experimenter and sex of subject. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Taggart, N. Food habits in pregnancy. Proceedings of the Nutritional Society, 1961, 20, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Thompson, D. A., Moskowitz, H. R., and Campbell, R. G. Effects of body weight and food intake on pleasantness ratings for a sweet stimulus. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1976, 47,77–83.Google Scholar
  109. Torgerson, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
  110. Trethowan, W. H., and Dickens, G. Appetite disorders in pregnancy. In N. Morris (Ed.), Psychosomatic medicine in obstetrics and gynaecology, 3rd international congress, London, 1971. Basel: Karger, 1972, 126–129.Google Scholar
  111. Valenstein, E. S., Cox, V. C., and Kakolewski, J. W. Further studies of sex differences in taste preferences with sweet solutions. Psychological Reports, 1967, 20, 1231–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Valenstein, E. S., Kakolewski, J. W., and Cox, V. C. Sex differences in taste preferences for glucose and saccharin solutions. Science, 1967, 156, 942–943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Vaschide, N. Mesure de la sensibilite gustative chez l’homme et chez la femme. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de VAcademie des Sciences, 1904, 139, 898–900.Google Scholar
  114. Wade, G. N. Sex hormones, regulatory behaviors, and body weight. In J. S. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, E. Shaw, and C. Beer (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior, Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 1976, pp. 201–279.Google Scholar
  115. Wade, G. N., and Zucker, I. Hormonal and developmental influences on rat saccharin preferences. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969a, 69, 291–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wade, G. N., and Zucker, I. Taste preferences of female rats: Modification by neonatal hormones, food deprivation, and prior experience. Physiology and Behavior, 1969b, 4, 935–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wade, G. N., and Zucker, I. Hormonal modulation of responsiveness to an aversive taste stimulus in rats. Physiology and Behavior, 1970, 5, 269–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wallen, R. Sex differences in food aversions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1943, 27, 288–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wallen, R. Food aversions of normal and neurotic males. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1945, 40, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Woodworth, R. S., and Schlosberg, H. Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1960.Google Scholar
  121. Wright, P., and Crow, R. A. Menstrual cycle: Effect on sweetness preferences in women. Hormones and Behavior, 1973, 4, 387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zucker, I. Hormonal determinants of sex differences in saccharin preference, food intake and body weight. Physiology and Behavior, 1969, 4, 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Doty
    • 1
  1. 1.Monell Chemical Senses Center and Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Human CommunicationUniversity of Pennsylvania Medical SchoolPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations