Advertisement

Sex Differences in Cognition: Evidence from the Hawaii Family Study

  • James R. Wilson
  • Steven G. Vandenberg

Abstract

Since 1972 we have been collecting family data in Hawaii in order to study the genetic and environmental bases of human cognition. Although data collection is now complete, it will be some time before all tests are scored and all laboratory measures are analyzed. Individual scores from the first three years of the study are available now, however, and they constitute a large and sufficient data set for many kinds of psychometric analyses. Planned analyses include the estimation of heritabilities and genetic correlations of scores on selected cognitive tests; a comparison of phenotypic and genetic cognitive factor structures; estimations of the effects of inbreeding, assortative mating, parental age, birth order, certain maternal-fetal interactions, and certain socioeconomic variables; a search for possible relationships between cognitive traits and genetic markers and between cognitive and dermatoglyphic traits; and investigations of possible heterosis, dominance, or epistasis in components of cognitive abilities. For this chapter, in honor of Frank Beach, we searched for sex differences in cognitive test performance.

Keywords

Mental Rotation Verbal Fluency Spatial Ability Spatial Visualization Perceptual Speed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bock, R. D., and Kolakowski, D. Further evidence of a sex-linked major gene influence on human spatial visualizing ability. American Journal of Human Genetics, 1973, 25, 1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Buros, O. K., (Ed.), Intelligence tests and reviews. Highland Park, New Jersey: Gryphon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Cattell, R. B. The structure of intelligence in relation to the nature-nurture controversy. In R. Cancro (Ed.), Intelligence: Genetic and environmental influences. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. DeFries, J. C., Vandenberg, S. G., McClearn, G. E., Kuse, A. R., Wilson, J. R., Ashton, G. C., and Johnson, R. C. Near identity of cognitive structure in two ethnic groups. Science, 1974, 183, 338–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeFries, J. C., Ashton, G. C., Johnson, R. C., Kuse, A. R., McClearn, G. E., Mi, M. P., Rashad, M. N., Vandenberg, S. G., and Wilson, J. R. Parent-offspring resemblance for specific cognitive abilities in two ethnic groups. Nature, 1976, 261, 131–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehrhardt, A. A., and Money, J. Man and woman, boy and girl. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. Hunt, S. M. Sex differences: A biological and psychological analysis of the differences between men and women. Liverpool, England: Vernon Scott Associates, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. Park, J. Y., Johnson, R. C., and Kuse, A. R. Cognitive structures in two different cultures. Unpublished manuscript, Behavioral Biology Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. Stafford, R. E. Sex differences in spatial visualization as evidence of sex-linked inheritance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1961, 13, 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tucker, L. R. A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel research section report no. 984. Washington, D.C., Department of the Army, 1951.Google Scholar
  12. Tyler, L. E. The psychology of human differences. 3rd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.Google Scholar
  13. Wilson, J. R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., Vandenberg, S. G., Johnson, R. C., and Rashad, M. N. Cognitive abilities: Use of family data as a control to assess sex and age differences in two ethnic groups. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 1975, 6(3), 261–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Wilson
    • 1
  • Steven G. Vandenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Behavioral GeneticsUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations