Advertisement

The Physics and Chemistry of Iceland Versus Mid-Ocean Ridge Hydrothermal Systems: Contrasting Boundary Conditions

  • Roger N. Anderson
Chapter
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 12)

Abstract

This section contains three papers on the chemistry and physics of hydrothermal systems on Iceland and on mid-ocean ridges. These contributions detail the contrasting styles of the two systems in detail. But before examining the specifics of these hydrothermal circulation systems, it is appropriate to step back and examine the differences from a broad perspective. The physical and chemical processes of a subaereal and a deep subaqueous hot spring are similar, except that the boundary conditions are dramatically different. These changing boundary conditions produce very different surface expressions of hydrothermal convection, and it is important to identify cause and effect. Below two examples are given of differences caused by contrasting land versus deep sea hydrothermal activity that result from the same physical and chemical principles operating under atmospheric and greater than 200 atmospheres of pressure, respectively. First, the effects of boiling or the lack thereof in the two systems is quite different. Second, the pattern of fracturing which controls permeability is, itself, controlled by very different pore pressure and thus effective stress regimes on land versus in the deep sea.

Keywords

Oceanic Crust Hydrothermal System Site 504B Boiling Curve Hydrothermal Convection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R.N., and Zoback, M.D., 1982, The permeability of the upper oceanic crust, J. Geophys. Res., 81: 2860–2868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R.N. et al., 1982, DSDP hole 504B, The first reference section over 1 km through layer 2 of the oceanic crust, Nature, 300: 589–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R.N., Zoback, M.D., and Newmark, R.L., The Permeability versus depth function of the oceanic crust, J. Geophys. Res.: submitted, 1983a.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson. R.N., Leslie, D., and Newmark, R.L., The Fracture Spectrum of the Oceanic Crust at Site 504B, Eastern Equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.: submitted, 1983b.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, K., et al., 1982, In Situ electrical resistivity and bulk porosity of the oceanic crust, Costa Rica Rift, Nature, 300: 594–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, K., Langseth, M.G., Von Herzen, R.P., and Anderson, R.N., Deep crustal geothermal measurements, Costa Rica Rift, J. Geophys. Res.: in press, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. Delaney, J.R., and Cosens, B.A., Boiling and Metal Deposition in Submarine Hydrothermal Systems, Marine Tech. Journal, 16: 62–67, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. Delaney, J.R., Mogk, D.W., and Mottl, M.J., Quartz-cemented, sulfide-bearing greenstone breccias from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge - samples of a high-temperature hydrothermal upflow zone, Science: in press, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. Hickman, S., Langseth, M.G., and Svitek, J., 1983, Permeability and pore pressure measurements at site 395 on the Mid Atlantic Ridge, J. Geophys. Res.: submitted.Google Scholar
  10. Kristmannsdôttir, H., 1983, Chemical evidences from Icelandic geothermal systems as compared to submerged geothermal systems, this volume.Google Scholar
  11. Rise Project Group, 1980, East Pacific Rise; hot springs and geothermal experiments, Science, 207: 1421–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stefánsson, V., 1982, The Krafla Geothermal Field, Northeast Iceland, in “Geothermal Systems. Principals and Case Histories”, L. Rybach and L.P.L. Muffler, eds., John Wiley, New York: 273–294.Google Scholar
  13. Stefánsson, V., 1983, Physical Environment of hydrothermal systems in Iceland and on submerged Oceanic ridges: this volume.Google Scholar
  14. Thompson, G., 1983, Basalt-Sea Water Interaction: this volume.Google Scholar
  15. Zoback, M.D., and Anderson, R.N., 1982, Borehole Televiewer Imagery of the upper oceanic crust, DSDP site 504B, Nature, 295: 345–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger N. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Lamont-Doherty Geological ObservatoryColumbia UniversityPalisadesUSA

Personalised recommendations