Is Heat a Substance?

  • Martin Goldstein
  • Inge Goldstein

Abstract

The scientific study of heat, like much else in science, has its roots in the most primitive experiences of daily life. One of the first things we learn is to recognize the difference between hot things and cold things, and for the rest of our lives that difference remains important. It is not surprising that the ancient Greeks, among other peoples, engaged in speculations about what it is that makes hot things hot. According to one of their theories, fire is one of four basic elements—the others being earth, air, and water—that make up all substances. We know today that this theory is wrong, that the elements are not earth, air, fire, and water, but oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, iron, and so on. The old theory sounds absurd to us now. But the reader, if asked how we know that oxygen is an element and fire is not, might be hard put to answer. The four-element theory seemed to its followers to give order and coherence to a confusing world, which is one of the conditions any scientific theory has to satisfy. One purpose of this chapter is to explain why we no longer believe that fire is an element.

Keywords

Heat Capacity Latent Heat Kinetic Theory Final Temperature Chaotic Motion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    Plato, The Dialogues of Plato, trans. B. Jowett, 2 vols. (New York: Random House, 1937).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Francis Bacon, The New Organon and Related Writings, ed. Fulton H. Anderson (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    John Locke, “Elements of Natural Philosophy.” In The Collected Works of John Locke, ed. C. Baldwin, 12th ed. (London: Printer, 1824).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arthur Jensen, Bias in Mental Testing (New York: Free Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  5. Leon J. Kamin, The Science and Politics of I.Q. (Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum, 1974).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Joseph Black, Lectures on the Elements of Chemistry. 3 vols. (1806; facsimile reprint, New York: AMS Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    The biographical material on Rumford is from the book by S. C. Brown, Count Rumford, Physicist Extraordinary. (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Count Rumford, “An Inquiry into the Weight Ascribed to Heat,” in The Collected Works of Count Rumford, ed. S. C. Brown, vol. I (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968), pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Ibid., “An Experimental Inquiry Concerning the Source of the Heat Which is Excited by Friction,” pp. 3-26.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Ibid., vol. 2 “Of the Slow Progress of the Spontaneous Mixture of Liquids Disposed to Unite Chemically with each Other.” pp. 74-79.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    S. G. Brush, “Should the History of Science be Rated X?” Science 183 (1974): 1164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    William of Ockham, 1300–1348. In his original wording: “A plurality must not be asserted without necessity.” Paraphrased more felicitously by John Ponce of Cork in the seventeenth century: “Entities should not be multiplied without necessity.” In Familiar Quotations, John Bartlett, 14th ed. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1968).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume, Perpetual Motion: The History of an Obsession (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Brown, Sanborn Conner. Count Rumford, Physicist Extraordinary. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, Sanborn Conner. Benjamin Thomson, Count Rumford. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, Sanborn Conner, ed. The Collected Works of Count Rumford. vol. 1; The Nature of Heat (1968); vol. 2; Practical Applications of Heat (1969). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968–1969.Google Scholar
  4. Cardwell, D. S. L. From Watt to Clausius: The Rise of Thermodynamics in the Early Industrial Age. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. Layzer, David. “Heritability Analysis of I.Q. Scores: Science or Numerology?.” Science 183 (1974): 1259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herrnstein, Richard. “I.Q.” The Atlantic (September 1971): 43.Google Scholar
  7. Sowell, Thomas. “The Great I.Q. Controversy.” Change (May 1973): 33.Google Scholar
  8. Roller, Duane. “The Early Development of the Concepts of Temperature and Heat. The Rise and Decline of the Caloric Theory.” In Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science. 2 vols. Edited by J. B. Conant and L. K. Nash. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  9. Romer, Robert H. Energy: An Introduction to Physics. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Goldstein
    • 1
  • Inge Goldstein
    • 2
  1. 1.Yeshiva UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations