Social Marketing and Community Health Promotion

The Stanford Heart Disease Prevention Program
  • Douglas S. Solomon

Abstract

There is a long history of failure among social programs using mass media as their major sources of intervention. Health promotion programs, a subset of these social campaigns, have also failed to live up to their potential. In fact, a commonly held belief is that the mass media are impotent in changing health habits and promoting new health behaviors. Searching the literature on health promotion programs using mass media, one is at a loss to find more than a small handful of examples of campaigns that have even approximated their originally stated objectives. The Stanford Heart Disease Prevention Program’s (SHDPP) Three Community Study was initiated in 1972 to test, in realistic field settings, the potential for the use of community-based approaches in health promotion.

Keywords

Mass Medium Social Marketing Formative Research Health Promotion Program Weight Loss Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkin, C. K. Research evidence on mass mediated health communication campaigns. Communication yearbook 3. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Cartwright, D. Some principles of mass persuasion: Selected findings of research on the sale of U.S. war bonds. In W. Schramm & D. Roberts (Eds.), The process and effects of mass communication (2nd ed.). Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  3. Farquhar, J. W., Maccoby, N., Alexander, J., Breitrose, H., Brown, B., Haskeil, W., McAlister, A., Meyer, A., Nash, J., & Stern, M. Community education for cardiovascular health. The Lancet, 1977, 1, 1192–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farquhar, J. W. The community-based models of life-style intervention trials. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1978, 108, 103–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fox, K., & Kotier, P. The marketing of social causes: The first 10 years. Journal of Marketing, 1980, 44, 24–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Intersociety Commission for Heart Disease Resources, Atherosclerosis Study Group, and Epidemiology Study Group. Primary prevention of the atherosclerotic disease. Circulation, 1970, 42, 42–45.Google Scholar
  7. Maccoby, N., & Alexander, J. Use of media in life-style programs. In P. Davidson (Ed.), Behavior medicine: Changing health life styles. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Banff International Conferences on Behavior Modification, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. Maccoby, N., & Farquhar, J. Communication for health: Unselling heart disease. Journal of Communication, 1975, 25, 114–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maccoby, N., & Solomon, D. Heart disease prevention: Community studies. In R. Rice & W. Paisley (Eds.), Public communication campaigns. Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage Publications, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. Maccoby, N., Farquhar, J., Wood, P., & Alexander, J. Reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease: Effect of a community-based campaign on knowledge and behavior. Journal of Community Health, 1977, 3, 100–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McGuire, W. J. The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. Menlo Park, Cal.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.Google Scholar
  12. McGuire, W. J. Theoretical foundation of campaigns. In R. Rice & W. Paisley (Eds.), Public communication campaigns. Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage Publications, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. Novelli, W. Confessions of a social marketer. In K. Fox & P. Kotier (Chairs), Social marketing in action. Symposium presented at the meetings of the American Marketing Association, Chicago, August 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Robertson, L. S., Kelley, A. B., O’Neill, B., Wixom, C. W., Eisworth, R. S., & Haddon, W. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii, and California. American Journal of Public Health, 1974, 64, 1071–1080.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers, E., with Shoemaker, F. Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York: Free Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  16. Schramm, W. What the research says. In Wilbur Schramm (Ed.), Quality in instructional television. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. Star, S., & Hughes, H. A report on an educational campaign: The Cincinnati plan for the United Nations. American Journal of Sociology, 1950, 55, 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Truett, J., Cornfield, J., & Kannel, W. A multivariate analysis of the risk of coronary heart disease in Framingham. Journal of Clinical Disorders, 1967, 20, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Healthy people: Surgeon general’s report on health promotion and disease prevention. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1979.Google Scholar
  20. Udry, J. R. The mass media and family planning. New York: Ballinger, 1974.Google Scholar
  21. Zimbardo, P., Ebbesen, E., & Maslach, C. Influencing attitudes and changing behavior. Menlo Park, Cal.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas S. Solomon
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Stanford Heart Disease Prevention ProgramStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Apple ComputerSan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations