The Nephrology Social Worker as the Primary Psychological Practitioner

  • Joseph G. Tramo

Abstract

In perusing the literature of psychosocial factors associated with end-stage renal disease, it is not unusual to find frequent references to interdisciplinary cooperation and team interaction. The reason for this is rather simple, for, in the relatively few years of dialysis/transplant development, it has become more and more apparent that the support systems surrounding this particular patient group are unique in concept and function. In no other area of medical specialty is the concentration of staff-patient contact as intense or ongoing, so intimately related to treatment and success or failure of this treatment. One finds it hard to compare even the myriad of cancer therapies or the strenuous mechanics of rehabilitation medicine to the crowded scale of day to day, medical and social attention that is rained upon the patient held captive by his kidney failure. Working in this arena, a professional feels the impact of loss and dependency more strongly than in other specialty areas and hears more clearly the call for psychological support from these patients who are neither well nor dying, fully dependent nor free, and neither in control nor fully without it.

Keywords

Social Worker Kidney Failure Home Agency Chronic Hemodialysis Dialysis Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Abram, H. S. The psychiatrist, the treatment of chronic renal failure, and the prolongation of life: II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 126, 157–166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchanan, D. C., and Abram, H. S. Psychological adaptation to chronic hemodialysis. Dialysis and Transplantation, 1976, 5 (2), 36–42, 84.Google Scholar
  3. Goldmeier, J. The social worker. Dialysis and Transplantation, 1973, 2 (3), 10.Google Scholar
  4. Hickey, K. Impact of kidney disease on patient, family, and society. Social Casework, 1972, 53 (7), 391–398.Google Scholar
  5. Kaplan De-Nour, A., Czaczkes, J. W., and Lelos, P. A study of chronic hemodialysis teams—differences in opinions and expectations. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1972, 25, 441–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Landsman, M. The renal social worker in a sattelite. Dialysis and Transplantation, 1976, 5 (3), 25–26.Google Scholar
  7. Lowe, J. I., and Herranen, M. Conflict in teamwork: Understanding roles and relationships. Social Work in Health Care, 1978, 3 (3), 323–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. MacNamara, M. Psychosocial problems in a renal unit. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1967, 113, 1231–1236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mailick, M. D., and Jordon, P. A multimodel approach to collaborative practice in health settings. Social Work in Health Care, 1977, 2 (4), 445–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. National Association of Social Workers. Code of Ethics (Amended ed.). April, 1967.Google Scholar
  11. Perlman, H. H. Social casework: a problem solving process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  12. Richmond, M. E. Social diagnosis (Paperback ed.). New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  13. Short, M. J. Roles of denial in chronic hemodialysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1969, 20, 433–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Walser, D. Behavioral effects of dialysis. The Canadian Nurse, 1974, 70, 23–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph G. Tramo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Medical Social ServicesTemple University HospitalUSA
  2. 2.Temple University School of Social AdministrationPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations