Psychological Reactions to Giving a Kidney

  • Roberta G. Simmons

Abstract

Kidney transplantation involves the unique resource of donated kidneys. Both living relatives and “newly dead cadavers” can provide this resource, with a living relative donating one of his kidneys to save the life of a family member and with cadavers able to donate both kidneys to persons on a waiting list. Because of immunological processes, the living related kidneys have tended to do better and survive longer;1 in addition, patients with willing related donors are spared the long and uncertain time on a waiting list. However, there is a widespread skepticism about the ability of a relative to make the major sacrifice of a kidney willingly and without significant regret later on.2 The perception is that family blackmail and pressure will be pervasive and will be the major factor motivating the potential donor. Posttransplant, the loss of a body part will engender long-term regret and depression. Thus, at many centers the policy of using related donors is regarded as a major ethical problem.3,4*

Keywords

Negative Feeling Good Person Psychological Reaction Cadaver Donor Kidney Transplant Donor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sommers, B. G., Sutherland, D. E. R., Simmons, R. L., Howard, R. J., and Najarian, J. S. Prognosis after renal transplantation: cumulative influence of combined risk factors. Transplantation, 1979, 27, 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Largiader, F. Transplant organ procurement and preservation. Documents geigy transplants: the way ahead, CIBA-GEIGY Limited, 1971, pp. 3-5.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brewer, S. P. Donors of organs seen as victims. New York Times, April 19, 1970, 36.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katz, J. and Capron, A. M. Catastrophic diseases: who decides what? New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamburger, J. and Crosnier, J. Moral and ethical problems in transplantation. In F. Rapaport and J. ausset (Eds.), Human transplantation. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spanos, P. K., Simmons, R. L., Lampe, E., Rattazzi, L. C., Kjellstrand, C. M., Goetz, F. C., and Najarian, J. S. Complications of related kidney donation. Surgery, 1974, 76, 741–747.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simmons, R. G., Klein, S. D., and Simmons, R. L. Gift of life: the social and psychological impact of organ transplantation. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simmons, R. G. Related donors: costs and gains. Transplantation Proceedings, 1977, 9, 143–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simmons, R. G., and Kamstra-Hennen, L. The living related kidney donor: psychological reactions when the kidney fails. Dialysis and Transplantation, 1979, 8, 572–574.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenberg, M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simmons, R. G., Klein, S. D., and Thornton, K. The family member’s decision to be a kidney transplant donor. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 1973, 4, 88–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fellner, C. H., and Marshall, J. R. Twelve kidney donors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1968, 206, 2703–2707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fellner, C. H., and Marshall, J. R. Kidney donors: the myth of informed consent. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1970, 126, 1245–1251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kamstra-Hennen, L., and Simmons, R. G. Ethics of related donation: The unsuccessful case. Proceedings of the Clinical Dialysis and Transplantation Forum, 1979, 8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cramond, W. A. Renal homotransplantation: some observations on recipients and donors. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1967, 113, 1223–1230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Litman, T. The family as a basic unit in health and medical care: a social behavioral overview. Social Science and Medicine, 1974, 8, 495–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rapaport, F. T. A second look at life: transplantation and dialysis patients: their own stories. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bernstein, D. M. and Simmons, R. G. The adolescent kidney donor: the right to give. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1974, 131, 1338–1343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spanos, P. K., Simmons, R. L., Simmons, R. G., Goldberg, M., and Najarian, J. S. The aging related kidney donor: prognosis for donor, recipient and kidney. Abstracts of the Sixth Annual Meeting of The American Society of Nephrology, 1973.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fulton, J., Fulton, R., and Simmons, R. The cadaver donor and the gift of life. In R. G. Simmons, S. D. Klein, and R. L. Simmons, Gift of life: the social and psychological impact of organ transplantation. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eisendrath, R. M., Guttman, R. D., and Murray, J. E. Psychological considerations in the selection of kidney transplant donors. Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics 1969, 229, 243–248.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simmons, R. G., Bruce, J., Bienvenue, R., and Fulton, J. Who signs an organ donor card: traditionalism versus transplantation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1974, 27, 491–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bradburn, N. M. The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberta G. Simmons
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations