Advertisement

Prisoners Transferred to Mental Hospitals

  • John Monahan
  • Sharon Kantorowski Davis
  • Eliot Hartstone
  • Henry J. Steadman
Part of the Perspectives in Law & Psychology book series (PILP, volume 6)

Abstract

It is becoming commonplace for the United States Supreme Court to cite social science research when it decides cases of relevance to the criminal justice (Ballew v. Georgia)1 or mental health systems (Addington v. Texas).2 Against this background, the first thing to strike a social scientist in the Vitek 3 prison-to-mental hospital transfer case is that the Court cited not a single piece of psychological or sociological data. This lack of attention to research on “social facts” (Saks, 1980) regarding prisoners who are transferred to mental hospitals bespeaks no general retreat by the Court from the incorporation of social science in judicial decisions. Rather, the more probable explanation is that the justices and their clerks simply could find no relevant empirical data on which to rely. Indeed, in our extensive search for material for this chapter, we have found very few studies directed explicitly at the topic of prison-to-mental hospital transfer. We shall, therefore, consider in some detail the results of our own recent national survey (see Introduction), as well as an in depth interim study of transfer procedures in six states.

Keywords

National Health Service Prison Population Inmate Population Mental Health Facility Male Prisoner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dell, S. Transfer of special patients to the NHS. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1980, 136, 222–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gearing, M., Heckel, R., & Matthey, W. The screening and referral of mentally disordered inmates in a state correctional system. Professional Psychology, 1980, 11, 849–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goffman, E. Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1961.Google Scholar
  4. Halleck, S. A critique of current psychiatric roles in the legal process. Wisconsin Law Review, 1966, 1966, 379–401.Google Scholar
  5. Hartstone, E., Davis, S., & Clark, P. Prison to mental health transfers post-Vitek: A six state survey. Unpublished manuscript, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. Monahan J., & Steadman, H. Crime and mental disorder: An epidemiological approach.Google Scholar
  7. N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. Rosenhan, D. On being sane in insane places. Science, 1973, 1979, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Roth, L. Correctional psychiatry. In W. Curran, A. McGorry, & C. Petty (Eds.), Modern legal medicine psychiatry, and forensic science, Philadelphia: Davis, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Saks, M. The utilization of evaluation research in litigation. New directions for program evaluation, 1980, 5, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Steadman, J., & Cocozza, J. Careers of the criminally insane. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Steadman, H., Monahan, J., Hartstone, E., Davis, S., & Robbins, P. Mentally disordered offenders: A national survey of patients and facilities. Law and Human Behavior, 1982, 6, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stelovick, S. From the hospital to the prison: A step forward in deinstitutionalization? Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1979, 30, 618–620.Google Scholar
  14. Thornberry, T., & Jacoby, J. The criminally insane: A community follow-up of mentally ill offenders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. Weis, J., & Henney, J. Crime and criminals in the United States. In E. Bittner & S. Messinger (Eds.), Criminology Review Yearbook (Vol. 2). Beverley Hills: Sage Publications, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Monahan
    • 1
  • Sharon Kantorowski Davis
    • 2
  • Eliot Hartstone
    • 3
  • Henry J. Steadman
    • 4
  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of La VerneLa VerneUSA
  3. 3.URSA InstituteSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Special Projects Research UnitNew York State Department of Mental HygieneAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations