Optical Diffraction by Electrodes: Use of Fourier Transforms in Spectroelectrochemistry

  • Richard L. McCreery
  • Paula Rossi

Abstract

The information content of an electrochemical experiment can be greatly enhanced by the addition of an optical probe to provide spectral information about material generated at the electrode surface. Methods combining UV-visible spectroscopy with electrochemistry were developed in the 1960’s, mainly by Kuwana1,2 and Murray3 and have proved very valuable for the characterization and monitoring of electrogenerated species. The technique described in this chapter also involves UV-visible spectroscopy of electrochemical processes, but makes use of the diffraction of light by an electrode. The diffraction pattern is a spatial Fourier transform of the illuminated electrode, and contains information about chromophores generated by an electrode process. Advantages of the diffraction approach to spectroelectrochemistry include high sensitivity, fast time response, and the possibility of describing the spatial distribution of chromophore in solution. After a discussion of the objectives of the diffractive approach, its theory and experimental verification will be described.

Keywords

Diffusion Layer High Spatial Frequency Refractive Index Change Copper Sulfate Diffusion Profile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kuwana, T., Darlington, R. K., and Leedy, D. W. 1964, Anal. Chem. 36, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    For reviews, see: Kuwana, T., and Winograd, N. 1978, in Electro-analytical Chemistry, Vol. 7, ed. A. J. Bard, Dekker, N.Y.Google Scholar
  3. Heineman, W. 1978, Anal. Chem. 50, 390A; andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuwana, T., and Heineman, W. R. 1976, Acct. Chem. Res. 9, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 3.
    Murray, R. W., Heineman, W. R., and O’Dom, G. W. 1967, Anal. Chem. 39, 1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 4.
    See, for example, Bard, A. J., and Faulkner, L. R. 1980, Electrochemical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Nicholson, R. S., and Shain, I. 1964, Anal. Chem. 36, 706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6.
    Flato, J. 1972, Anal. Chem. 44, 75A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 7.
    Kuwana, T. 1973, Ber. Bunsenges Phys. Chem. 77, 858.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Muller, R. H. 1973, Adv. Electrochem. Eng. 9, 281.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Pruiksma, R., and McCreery, R. L. 1979, Anal. Chem. 51, 2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 10.
    Pruiksma, R., and McCreery, R. L. 1981, Anal. Chem. 53, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 11.
    The Kirchoff-Huygens approach is discussed in most physics textbooks. Clear treatments are presented in: Longhurst, R. S. 1957, Geometrical and Physical Optics, Lungmans, Green & Co., N.Y., p. 193; and Marcuse, D. 1972, Light Transmission Optics, Van Nostrand Reinhold, N.Y., p. 31.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Rossi, P., McCurdy, C. W., and McCreery, R. L. 1981, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 103, 2524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    See ref. 11a, p. 195; ref. 11b, p. 39.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Gaskill, J. P. 1978, Linear Systems, Fourier Transforms, and Optics, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., p. 376.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Vest, C. M. 1979, Holographic Interferometry, John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., p. 21.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    See Pruiksma, R. 1980, Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. McCreery
    • 1
  • Paula Rossi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations