Pollution pp 689-707 | Cite as

Some Economic, Spatial, Social and Political Indicators of Environmental Quality of Urban Life

  • Chester Rapkin
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 2)

Abstract

In a nation which is turning increasingly urban, the quality of the urban environment constitutes a major test of the level of its well-being as a society. The 243 metropolitan areas of the United States now comprise 69 percent of the nation’s population and are more than ever the center of its economic and cultural life. Al — though planners and social scientists have long questioned the low priority given to enhancing the urban environment, growing segments of the public share their concern, recognizing glaring deficiencies in their surroundings. The national discussion about priorities in government expenditures is clearly tied to this realization and seeks to redirect government effort toward such pressing areas of domestic need as the improvement of urban development and housing, the health of the people, crime prevention, recreation and education, and environmental pollution, among others.

Keywords

Metropolitan Area Urban Environment Social Indicator Crime Prevention Policy Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Footnotes

  1. 1.
    For example, see Goals for Americans, the report of the President’s Commission on National Goals, Spectrum, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mancur Olson, Jr., “The Purpose and Plan of a Social Report, ” The Public Interest, No. 15, Spring 1969, p. 86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eleanor Bernert Sheldon and Wilbert E. Moore, “Monitoring Social Change in American Society,” Indicators of Social Chancre, edited by Sheldon and Moore, Russell Sage Foundation, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harvey S. Perloff, “A Framework for Dealing With the Urban Environment: Introductory Statement,” The Quality of the Urban Environment, ed. Perloff, Resources for the Future, 1969, p. 16.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Statement by Nathan Glazer, hearings before the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Urban Growth of the Committee on Banking and Currency on the Quality of Urban Life, Washington, D.C., November 17, 1969, p. 400.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin V. Jones and Michael J. Flax, The Quality of Life in Metropolitan Washington, D.C.: Some Statistical Benchmarks, The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., March 1970.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    For an example of a set of urban indicators applying to a central city, see The Quality of Life in Urban America, New York City: ARegional and National Comparative Analysis, Vol: I and II, ed. John Berenyi, Office of Administration, Office of the Mayor, New York City, May 1971.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perloff, op. cit., pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    For an example of indicators applying to neighborhoods within a city, see Urban Level-of-Living Index, Community Renewal Program, Department of City Planning, Pittsburgh, Pa. 1965.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    George L. Engle has classified the external injuries that strain the individual into four general categories: physical injury, insufficient food, water, air, etc., infection by pathogenic organisms, and psychological stress. Psychological Development in Health and Disease, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1962.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harold M. Proshansky, William H. Ittelson, Leanne G. Rivlin “The Influence of the Physical Environment on Behavior: Some Basic Assumptions,” Environmental Psychology, Man and His Physical Setting. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970, pp. 8 and 28. The works by Watson, Kaffka, and Lewin are referred to in Proshansky et al. The latest study by B.F. Skinner is entitled Beyond Freedom and Dignity, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Regional Plan Association, “Human Responses to Patterns of Urban Density,” New York, August 20, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative, Dell Publishing Co., New York, 1966. Edward T. Hall, The Hidden Dimension, Doubleday & Co., New York, 1966.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Augustus F. Kinzel, “Body-Buffer Zone in Violent Prisoners,” presented at American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting, May 1969.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee Rainwater, “Fear and House as Haven in the Lower Class,” AIP Journal, Jan. 1966; Marc Fried, “Grieving for a Lost Home,” Leonard J. Duhl (ed.), The Urban Condition: People and Policy in the Metropolis, Basic Books, 1963, and “Transitional Functions of Working Class Communities: Implications for Forced Relocation,” Mildred B. Kantor (ed.), Mobility and Mental Health, Charles C. Thomas, 1963.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leo Srole et al, Mental Health in the Metropolis: The Mid-Town Manhattan Study, Vol. I, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1962. Thomas S. Langner and Stanley T. Michael, Life Stress and Mental Health: The Mid-Town Manhattan Study, Vol. II, Free Press of Glencoe, 1963.Google Scholar
  17. D.C. Leighton et al, The Sterling County Study, Basic Books, 1963.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    James P. Page (ed.), Approaches to Psychopathology, Temple University Publications, 1966, p. 6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.E.L. Faris and W.H. Dunham, Mental Disorders in Urban Areas-An Ecological Study of Schizophrenia and Other Psychoses, University of Chicago Press, 1939. August B. Hollingshead and Fredrick C. Redlich, Social Class and Mental Illness-A Community Study, John Wiley & Sons, 1958. Langner & Michael, op.cit.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olson, op. cit. pp. 93–95.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    For a general discussion of an alternative urban indicator system divided along individual, family, and institutional lines, see Daniel P. Moynihan, “Urban Conditions: General, ” The Annals, Vol. 371, May 1967, pp. 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Olson, op. cit., p. 90.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    For a full discussion of the relevance of demographic information to social indicators, see Conrad Taeuber, “Population: Trends and Characteristics,” Indicators of Social Change, op. cit., pp. 27–73.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    For an extensive examination of information needed for a system of demographic indicators, see Grace Milgram and Robert W. Ponte, Demographic Indicators of Metropolitan Problems: A Suggested Framework for the General Guidance of H.U.D. Program Emphasis, report prepared for U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development by Institute of Urban Environment, Columbia University, New York, October 1969.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    For a discussion of additional data needs for housing indicators, see Chester Rapkin and Robert W. Ponte, Indicators of Metropolitan Housing and Residential Construction Needs; A Suggested Framework for the Allocation of Future H.U.D. Assistance, report prepared for U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development by Institute of Urban Environment, Columbia University, New York, June 1970.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karl E. Taeuber and Alma F. Taeuber, Negroes in Cities, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. Stuart Chapin Jr., Urban Land Use Planning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1965.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kevin Lynch, The Image of the City, MIT Press, 1960; Kevin Lynch, Donald Appleyard, and John R. Myer, The View From the Road, MIT Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jones and Flax,op. cit., p. 49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chester Rapkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbia UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations