Quantum Equivalence Principle
A simple mapping procedure is presented by which classical orbits and path integrals for the motion of a point particle in flat space can be transformed directly into those in curved space with torsion. Our procedure evolved from well-established methods in the theory of plastic deformations, where crystals with defects are described mathematically as images of ideal crystals under active nonholonomic coordinate transformations.
Our mapping procedure may be viewed as a natural extension of Einstein’s famous equivalence principle. When applied to time-sliced path integrals, it gives rise to a new quantum equivalence principle which determines short-time action and measure of fluctuating orbits in spaces with curvature and torsion. The nonholonomic transformations possess a nontrivial Jacobian in the path integral measure which produces in a curved space an additional term proportional to the curvature scalar R, thus canceling a similar term found earlier by DeWitt. This cancellation is important for correctly describing semiclassically and quantum mechanically various systems such as the hydrogen atom, a particle on the surface of a sphere, and a spinning top. It is also indispensable for the process of bosonization, by which Fermi particles are redescribed by those fields.
KeywordsCurvature Scalar Curve Space Point Particle Schrodinger Equation Christoffel Symbol
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Among the most widely discussed procedures was a postpoint discretization due to Ito and a midpoint discretization due to Stratonovich, with different mathematical advantages. For a detailed discussion see the textbooks H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation, second edition, Springer, 1983, Vol. 18Google Scholar
- Stochastic differential equations in curved spaces are developed in K. D. Elworthy, Stochastic differential equations on manifolds, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982Google Scholar
- K. D. Elworthy, Path Integration on Manifolds, in Mathematical Aspects of Superspace, eds. H.-J. Seifert, C. Clarke, and A. Rosenblum, Reidei, 1984.Google Scholar
- P. L. Robinson and J. H. Rawnsley, The metaplectic representation, Mpc structures, and geometric quantization, publ. by the American Mathematical Society in the series Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society no. 410 0065-9266, Providence, R. I., 1989.Google Scholar
- For details and more references see H. Kleinert, Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter, Vol. I Superflow and Vortex Lines, pp. 1-744, and Vol. II Stresses and Defects, World Scientific, Singapore 1989, pp. 744-1443.Google Scholar
- K. Kondo, in: Proc. 2nd Japan Nat. Congr. Applied Mechanics, Tokio, 1952Google Scholar
- E. Kröner, in: Physics of defects, Les Houches summer school XXXV, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1981.Google Scholar
- Fortschr. d. Phys. 30, 401 (1982).Google Scholar
- P. Fiziev and H. Kleinert, New Action Principle for Classical Particle Trajectories In Spaces with Torsion, Europh. Lett. 35, 241 1996 (hep-th/9503074 and http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/kleiner_re219/newvar.html/~kleinert/kleiner_re219/newvar.html).
- A. Pelster and H. Kleinert, FU-Berlin preprint, May 1996 (gr-qc/9605028 and http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/kleiner_re243/preprint.html/~kleinert/kleiner_re243/preprint.html).
- Our notation for the geometric quantities in spaces with curvature and torsion is the same as in J. A. Schouten, Ricci Calculus, Springer, Berlin 1954.Google Scholar
- P. Fiziev and H. Kleinert, Euler Equations for Rigid-Body — A Case for Autoparallel Trajectories in Spaces with Torsion, Berlin preprint 1995 (hep-th/9503075 and http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/~kleinert/kleiner_re224/euler.html/~kleinert/kleiner_re224/euler.html).
- H. Kleinert, Collective Quantum Fields, Lectures presented at the First Erice Summer School on Low-Temperature Physics, 1977, Fortschr. Physik 26, 565-671 (1978).Google Scholar
- See also the predecessorsGoogle Scholar
- H. Kleinert, On the Hadronization of Quark Theories, Lectures presented at the Erice Summer Institute 1976, in Understanding the Fundamental Constituents of Matter, Plenum Press, New York, 1978, A. Zichichi ed., pp. 289-390.Google Scholar
- V. L. Ginzburg and L. D. Landau, Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950).Google Scholar
- S. Tomonaga, Progr. Theor. Phys. 5, 63 (1950).Google Scholar
- For a review see: D. R. Bes, R. A. Broglia, Lectures delivered at “E. Fermi” Varenna Summer School, Varenna, Como Italy, 1976. For recent studies: D. R. Bes, R. A. Broglia, R. Liotta, B. R. Mottelson, Phys. Letters B 52, 253 (1974); B 56, 109 (1975), Nuclear Phys. A 260, 127 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- A. V. Svidzinskij, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 9, 273 (1971)Google Scholar
- J. Fröhlich, R. Götschmann and P. A. Marchetti, preprint (hep-th/9406154).Google Scholar
- For a semiclassical study of the model at finite times see H. Kleinen and H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. A 332, 33 (1979).Google Scholar
- H. Kleinert, Nonabelian Bosonization as a Nonholonomic Transformations from Flat to Curved Field Space. FU-Berlin preprint 1996Google Scholar