Electronic Density Functional Theory pp 167-176 | Cite as

# Are Unoccupied Kohn-Sham Eigenvalues Related to Excitation Energies?

## Abstract

In the Kohn-Sham density functional method [1,2,3,4], the true interacting-electron system is replaced by a system of non-interacting electrons in an effective potential, *v* _{eff}, defined by the requirement that the density of the non-interacting electrons equals the true density. The single particle orbitals and their eigenenergies were originally introduced as a mathematical artifact in order to achieve a good approximation to the kinetic energy, leaving only a relatively small term, the exchange-correlation energy *E* _{xc}, to be approximated in practical implementations of the theory. It was later shown [5] that the energy of the highest occupied orbital is in fact the negative of the ionization energy. However, most approximate functionals (such as the commonly used local density approximation [2,3,4]) yield poor approximations to it. The energies of the other occupied orbitals and of the unoccupied orbitals do not have a rigorous correspondence to excitation energies. Nevertheless, it is common practice to compare eigenvalue differences to optical spectra of molecules and solids. Since these comparisons are made using Kohn-Sham eigenvalues obtained from approximate exchange-correlation functionals, it is not clear how much of the discrepancy between theory and experiment would persist if the true Kohn-Sham eigenvalues were to be used. In this paper we show that there is a surprising degree of agreement between the exact ground-state Kohn-Sham eigenvalue differences and excitation energies, for excitations from the highest occupied orbital to the unoccupied orbitals.

## Keywords

Excitation Energy Local Density Approximation Principal Quantum Number Quantum Defect Unoccupied Orbital## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev.
**136**, B864 (1964).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys Rev.
**140**, A1133 (1965).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.R. G. Parr and W. Yang,
*Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules*(Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar - 4.R. M. Dreizler and E. K. U. Gross,
*Density Functional Theory*(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.J. P. Perdew, R. G. Parr, M. Levy and J. L. Balduz, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**49**, 1691 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - M Levy, J. P. Perdew and V. Sahni Phys. Rev. B
**30**, 2745 (1994).Google Scholar - U. von Barth in
*Electronic Structure of Complex Systems*, edited by P. Phariseau and W. M. Temmerman, NATO ASI Series B, vol. 113 (1984).Google Scholar - 6.C. J. Umrigar and X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. A
**50**, 3827 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.The wave function used is a minor modification of that in D. E. Freund, B. D. Huxtable and J. D. Morgan, Phys. Rev. A
**29**, 980 (1984). The precise form of the wave function used is described in Ref. [6].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.C. J. Umrigar and X. Gonze, in
*High Performance Computing and its Application to the Physical Sciences*, proceedings of the Mardi Gras’ 93 Conference, edited by D. A. Browne*et al*(World Scientific, Singapore, 1993); and unpublished.Google Scholar - 9.C. J. Umrigar, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**71**, 408 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.C. J. Umrigar, P. Nightingale and K. J. Runge, J. Chem. Phys.
**99**, 2865 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.C. Filippi, C. J. Umrigar and X. Gonze in
*Theoretical and Computational Chemistry: Recent Developments in Density Functional Theory*, edited by J. Seminario (Elsevier, 1996).Google Scholar - 12.G. W. F. Drake in
*Casimir Forces: Theory and Recent Experiments on Atomic Systems*, edited by F. S. Levin and D. A. Micha, (Plenum, New York 1993); G. W. F. Drake and Zong-Chao Yan, Chem. Phys. Lett.**229**, 486 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.G. W. F. Drake in
*Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics*, edited by G. W. F. Drake (AIP Press, New York, 1996), pp. 154–171Google Scholar - E. Riis, A. G. Sinclair, O. Poulsen, G. W. F. Drake, W. R. C. Rowlwy and A. P. Levick, Phys. Rev. A
**49**, 207 (1994).; private communication.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.O. Gunnarson and K. Schönhammer, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**56**, 1968 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 15.S. Bashkin and J. D. Stoner,
*Atomic Energy Levels and Grotrian Diagrams*, vol. 1. (North Holland 1975, addendum 1978).Google Scholar - 16.Abdullah Al-Sharif, R. Resta and C. J. Umrigar, unpublished.Google Scholar
- 17.A. Görling and M. Levy, Int. J. Quant. Chem, Symp.
**29**, 93 (1995); Phys. Rev. A**50**, 196 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.C.-O. Almbladh and U. von Barth, Phys. Rev. B
**31**, 3231 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.
- 20.C. Filippi, C. J. Umrigar and X. Gonze, unpublished.Google Scholar
- 21.Mark E. Casida in
*Theoretical and Computational Chemistry: Recent Developments in Density Functional Theory*, edited by J. Seminario (Elsevier, 1996).Google Scholar - 22.M. Petersilka and E. K. U. Gross, Int. J. Quant. Chem.
**30**, 1393 (1996); M. Petersilka, U. J. Gossman and E. K. U. Gross, contribution in this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar