Advertisement

Two-Dimensional Gene Scanning

  • Daizong Li
  • Nathalie van Orsouw
  • Chris Huang
  • Jan Vijg

Abstract

The large size of many human genes, in combination with the frequent occurrence of many different mutations over the entire gene, severely limits direct diagnosis. Since gene diagnosis by sequencing on a large scale is not yet cost-effective, other methods such as the analysis of single-strand conformation polymorphisms (SSCP), heteroduplex analysis, and analysis by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) are presently being employed (for a review, see Cotton, 1993; see also elsewhere in this volume). While these systems are very useful, they are difficult to adapt for large-scale analyses and most of them are restricted in their detection rates. Moreover, all currently available methods lack uniformity and standardization.

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Detect Point Mutation Electrophoresis Instrument Melting Domain Comprehensive Mutation Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, E. S., Murdaugh, S. E., and Lerman, L. S. (1990). Comprehensive detection of single base changes in human genomic DNA using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and a GC clamp. Genomics 7:463–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beggs, A. H., Koenig, M., Boyce, F. M., and Kunkel, L. M. (1990). Detection of 98% DMD/BMD gene deletions by PCR. Hum. Genet 86:45–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanquet, V., Turleau, C., Gross-Morand, M.-S., Sénamaud-Beaufort, C., Doz, R., and Besmond, C. (1995). Spectrum of germline mutations in the RBI gene: A study of 232 patients with hereditary and non hereditary retinoblastoma. Hum. Mol Genet. 2:975–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chamberlain, J. S., Gibbs, R. A., Ranier, J. E., Nguyen, P. N., and Caskey, C. T. (1988). Deletion screening of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:11141–11156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costes, B., Fanen, P., Goossens, M., and Ghanem, N. (1993). A rapid, efficient, and sensitive assay for simultaneous detection of multiple cystic fibrosis mutations. Hum. Mutat. 2:185–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cotton, R. G. H. (1993). Current methods of mutation detection. Mutat. Res. 285:125–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dianzani, I., Camaschella, C., Ponzone, A., and Cotton, R. G. H. (1993). Dilemmas and progress in mutation detection. Trends Genet. 9:403–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, M. C., and Gibbs, R.A. (1994). Multiplex PCR:Advantages, development and applications. PCR Methods Appl. 3:S65–S75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer, S. G., and Lerman, L. S. (1979a). Length-independent separation of DNA restriction fragments in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis Cell 16:191–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer, S. G., and Lerman, L.S. (1979b). Two-dimensional electrophoretic separation of restriction enzyme fragments of DNA. Methods Enzymol. 68:183–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foord, O. S., and Rose, E.A. (1994). Long-distance PCR. PCR Methods Appl. 3:S149–S161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guldberg, P., Henriksen, K. F., and Guttler, F. (1993). Molecular analysis of phenylketonuria in Denmark:99% of the mutations detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Genomics 17:141–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lerman, L. S., and Silverstein, K. (1987). Computational simulation of DNA melting and its application to denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol. 155:482–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, D., and Vijg, J. (1996). Multiplex co-amplification of 24 retinoblastoma gene exons after pre-amplification by long-distance PCR. Nucleic Acids Res., 24:538–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moyret, C., Theillet, C., Puig, P. L., Moles, J-R, Thomas, G., and Hamelin, R. (1994). Relative efficiency of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and single strand conformation polymorphism in the detection of mutations in exons 5 to 8 of the p53 gene. Oncogene 9:1739–1743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mullaart, E., de Vos, G. J., te Meerman, G. J., Uitterlinden, A. G., and Vijg, J. (1993). Parallel genome analysis by two-dimensional DNA typing. Nature 365:469–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Myers, R. M., Fischer, S. G., Lerman, L. S., and Maniatis, T. (1985). Nearly all single base substitutions in DNA fragments joined to a GC-clamp can be detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:3131–3145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers, R.M., Maniatis, T., and Lerman, L. S. (1987). Detection and localization of single base changes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol. 155:501–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheffield, V. C., Cox, D. R., Lerman, L. S., and Myers, R. M. (1989). Attachment of a 40-base-pair G+C-rich sequence (GC-clamp) to genomic DNA fragments by the polymerase chain reaction results in improved detection of single-base changes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86:232–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sheffield, V. C., Beck, J. S., Kwitek, A. E., Sandstrom, D.W., and Stone, E.M. (1993). The sensitivity of single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis for the detection of single base substitutions. Genomics 16:325–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sidman, C. L., and Shaffer, D.J. (1994). Large-scale genomic comparison using two-dimensional DNA gels. Genomics 23:15–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Uitterlinden, A. G. and Vijg, J. (1994). Two-Dimensional DNA Typing: A Parallel Approach to Genome Analysis. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
  23. Uitterlinden, A. G., Slagboom, P. E., Knook, D. L., and Vijg, J. (1989). Two-dimensional DNA fingerprinting of human individuals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86:2742–2746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van Orsouw, N., Li, D., van der Vlies, P., Scheffer, H., Eng, C., Buys, C. H. C. M., Li, F. P., and Vijg, J. (1996). Mutational Scanning of large genes by extensive PCR multiplexing and two-dimensional electrophoresis: Application to the RBI gene. Hum. Mol. Genet., in press.Google Scholar
  25. Vijg, J. (1995a). Detecting individual genetic variation. Bio/Technology 13:137–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vijg, J. (1995b). Two-dimensional DNA typing: A cost-effective way of analyzing complex mixtures of DNA fragments for sequence variations. Mol. Biotechnol. 4:275–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vijg, J., Wu, Y, Uitterlinden, A. G., and Mullaart, E. (1994). Two-dimensional DNA electrophoresis in mutation detection. Mutat. Res. 308:205–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu, Y, Hofstra, R., Scheffer, H., Uitterlinden, A. G., Mullaart, E., Buys, C. H. C. M., and Vijg, J. (1996). Comprehensive and accurate mutation scanning of the CFTR-gene by two-dimensional DNA electrophoresis. Hum. Mutat., in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daizong Li
    • 1
  • Nathalie van Orsouw
    • 1
  • Chris Huang
    • 1
  • Jan Vijg
    • 1
  1. 1.Molecular Genetics Section, Gerontology Division, Department of MedicineBeth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations