Body and Self Experience

Japan versus USA
  • Jack Demick
  • Shinji Ishii
  • Wataru Inoue


The present study examines differences between Japanese and American individuals in aspects of body and self experience. The research is based on previous work in the United States (e. g., Demick & Rivers, 1996; Demick & Wapner, 1987, 1996) that has attempted to provide a holistic, developmental, systems approach to body and self experience most generally. That body and self experience are of significant concern to environmental psychologists as well as to others interested in environment-behavior relations (e. g., architects, planners, sociologists) gains support from the notion that aspects of body and self experience encompass relevant general processes such as spatial relations (e. g., between the individual and his or her physical environment or between the individual and others in his or her interpersonal environment).


Body Image Bulimia Nervosa Personal Space Sociocultural Context Body Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territorially and crowding.Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, M. I., & Wapner, S. (1965). Apparent length of body parts attended to separately and in combination. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20, 904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Escaping the self: Alcoholism, spirituality, masochism, and other flights from the burden of selfhood.New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bern, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birdwhistell, R. L. (1952). Introduction to kinesics.Louisville, KY: University of Louisville Press.Google Scholar
  6. Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context.Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bond, M. H. (1986). The psychology of the Chinese people.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, A. C., Munce, S., & Galea, J. (1982). American gangs and British subcultures: A comparison. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 26, 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cash, T. F. (1989). Body-image affect: Gestalt versus summing the parts. Perceptual and Motor Skills,69, 17–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cash, T. F. (1990). The psychology of physical appearance: Aesthetics, attributes, and images. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 51–79). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cash, T. F., & Green, G. K. (1986). Body weight and body image among college women: Perception, cognition, and affect. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(2), 290–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coopersmith, S. (1981). Self-esteem inventories.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cousins, S. (1989). Culture and selfhood in Japan and the U.S. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crider, C. (1981). Children’s conception of the inside of the body. In R. Bibace & M. Walsh (Eds.), Children’s conceptions of health, illness, and bodily functions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Critchley, M. (1965). Disorders of corporeal awareness in parietal disease. In S. Wapner & H. Werner (Eds.), The body percept (pp. 68–81). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Damon, W., & Hart, D. (1982). The development of self-understanding from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 53, 841–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dandonoli, P., Demick, J., & Wapner, S. (1990). Physical arrangement and age as determinants of environmental representation. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 7(1), 26–36.Google Scholar
  18. de Ajuriaguerra, J. (1965). Discussion. In S. Wapner & H. Werner (Eds.), The body percept (pp. 82–106). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  19. Demick, J. (1993). Adaptation of marital couples to open versus closed adoption: A preliminary investigation. In J. Demick, K. Bursik, & R. DiBiase (Eds.), Parental development (pp. 175–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Demick, J., & Rivers, S. (1996). Aspects of body experience: A confirmatory factor analytic study. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  21. Demick, J., & Wapner, S. (1980). Effects of environmental relocation on members of a psychiatric therapeutic community Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 444–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Demick, J., & Wapner, S. (1987, November). A holistic, developmental approach to body experience.The Body and Literature: An Interdisciplinary Conference, SUNY-Buflalo, NYGoogle Scholar
  23. Demick, J., & Wapner, S. (1996). A holistic, developmental, systems-oriented approach to body experience. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  24. Demick, J., Hoffman, A., & Wapner, S. (1985). Residential context and environmental change as determinants of urban experience. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 2(3), 44–54.Google Scholar
  25. Demick, J., Inoue, W., Wapner, S., Ishii, S., Minami, H., Nishiyama, S., & Yamamoto, T. (1992). Cultural differences in impact of governmental legislation: Automobile safety belt usage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23(4), 468–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DesLauriers, A. (1962). The experience of reality in childhood schizophrenia.New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Edney, J. J., & Jordan-Edney, N. L. (1974). Territorial spacing on a beach. Sociometry, 37, 523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fallon, A. E., & Rozin, P. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94(1), 102–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fisher, S. (1986). Development and structure of the body image (Vols. 1-2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Fisher, S., & Cleveland, S. E. (1965). Personality, body perception, and body image boundary. In S. Wapner & H. Werner (Eds.), The body percept (pp. 48–67). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  31. Fisher, S., & Cleveland, S. E. (1968). Body image and personality.New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  32. Geliert, E. (1968). Comparison of children’s self-drawings with their drawings of other persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 307–324.Google Scholar
  33. Geliert, E. (1975). Children’s constructions of their self-images. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 307–324.Google Scholar
  34. Greenbaum, E. E., & Greenbaum, S. D. (1981). Territorial personalization: Group identity and social interaction in a Slavic-American neighborhood. Environment and Behavior, 13, 574–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Garden City, NY. Doubleday.Google Scholar
  36. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension.New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  37. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  38. Hamaguchi, E. (1985). A contextual model of the Japanese: Toward a methodological innovation in Japan studies. Journal of Japanese Studies, 11, 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hayashi, C. (1988). National character of the Japanese.Tokyo: Statistical Bureau, Japan.Google Scholar
  40. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Horowitz, M., Duff, D., & Stratton, L. (1964). Body buffer zone: Explorations of personal space. Archives of General Psychology, 11, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health.New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaplan, E. (1983). Process and achievement revisited. In S. Wapner & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Toward a holistic developmental psychology (pp. 143–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Lerner, R. M. (1969). The development of stereotyped expectancies of body build relations. Child Development, 40, 137–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lerner, R. M., Iwawaki, S., Chihara, T., & Sorell, G. T. (1980). Self-concept, self-esteem, and body attitudes among Japanese male and female adolescents. Child Development, 51, 847–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewis, M. (1989). Culture and biology: The role of temperament. In P. Zelazo & R. Barr (Eds.), Challenges to developmental paradigms (pp. 203–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  49. Naglieri, J. A. (1988). Draw a person: A quantitative scoring.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  50. Nasar, J. L., & Min, M. S. (1984, August). Modifiers of perceived spaciousness and crowding: A cross-cultural study.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  51. Patterson, A. H., & Chiswick, N. R. (1981). The role of the social and physical environment in privacy maintenance among the Iban of Borneo. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pennebaker, J. W (1982). The psychology of physical symptoms.New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Porzemsky, J., Wapner, S., & Glick, J. A. (1965). Effect of experimentally induced self-object cognitive attitudes on body and object perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21, 187–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Reischauer, E. O. (1978). The United States and Japan (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rosenberger, N. R. (Ed.). (1992). Japanese sense of self.New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Sandier, J., & Rosenblatt, B. (1962). The concept of the representational world. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, XVII, 128–145.Google Scholar
  60. Santostefano, S. (1978). A biodevelopmental approach to clinical child psychology: Cognitive controls and cognitive control therapy.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  61. Schilder, P. (1935). The image and appearance of the human body.London: Kegan, Trench, Turbner.Google Scholar
  62. Secord, P., & Jourard, S. (1953). The appraisal of body cathexis: Body cathexis and the self. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 17, 343–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schlater, J. A., Baker, A. H., & Wapner, S. (1981). Apparent arm length with active versus passive touch. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 151–154.Google Scholar
  64. Shontz, F. C. (1969). Perceptual and cognitive aspects of body experience.New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  65. Shontz, F. C. (1974). Body image and its disorders. Internationaljournal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 5, 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simmel, M. L. (1956). Phantoms in patients with leprosy and in elderly digital amputees. American Journal of Psychology, 69, 529–545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith, H. W. (1981). Territorial spacing on a beach revisited: A cross-national exploration. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Striegel-Moore, R. H., Silberstein, L. R., & Rodin, J. (1993). The social self in bulimia nervosa: Public self-consciousness, social anxiety, and perceived fraudulence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 297–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thompson, J. K., & Dolce, J. J. (1989). The discrepancy between emotional versus rational estimates of body size, actual size, and ideal body ratings: Theoretical and clinical implications. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 473–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thompson, J. K., Penner, L. A., & Altabe, M. N. (1990). Procedures, problems, and progress in the assessment of body images. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 21–48). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  71. Toshima, T., Demick, J., & Miyatani, M., Ishii, S., & Wapner, S. (1996). Cross-cultural differences in processes underlying sequential cognitive activity. Japanese Psychological Research, 38(2), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Triandis, H. C. (1989). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 37, 41–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wapner, S. (1968). Age changes in perception of verticality and of the longitudinal body axis under body tilt. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, 543–555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wapner, S. (1969). Organismic-developmental theory: Some applications to cognition. In J. Langer, P. Mussen, & M. Covington (Eds.), Trends and issues in developmental psychology (pp. 38–67). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  76. Wapner, S. (1981). Transactions of persons-in-environments: Some critical transitions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wapner, S. (1987). A holistic-, developmental-, systems-oriented environmental psychology: Some beginnings. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 1433–1465). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Wapner, S., & Demick, J. (1990). Development of experience and action: Levels of integration in human functioning. In G. Greenberg & E. Tobach (Eds.), Theories of the evolution of knowing: The T. C. Schneirla conference series (pp. 47–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  79. Wapner, S., & Werner, H. (1965). An experimental approach to body perception from the organismic-developmental point of view. In S. Wapner & H. Werner (Eds.), The body percept (pp. 9–25). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  80. Wapner, S., McFarland, J. H., & Werner, H. (1963). Effect of visual spatial context on perception of one’s own body. British Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 41–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wapner, S., Werner, H., & Comalli, P. E. (1958). Effect of enhancement of head boundary on head size and shape. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 319–325.Google Scholar
  82. Werner, H. (1957). Comparative psychology of mental development (rev. ed.). New York: International Universities Press (originally published in 1940).Google Scholar
  83. Witkin, H. A. (1965). Development of the body concept and psychological differentiation. In S. Wapner & H. Werner (Eds.), The body percept (pp. 26–47). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  84. Worchel, S., & Lollis, M. (1982). Reactions to territorial contamination as a function of culture. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 370–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wylie, R. (1974). The self-concept: A review of methodological considerations and measuring instruments (Vol. 1). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  86. Yoors, J. (1967). The gypsies.New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  87. Yu, E. S. H. (1974). Achievement motive, familism, and bsiao: A replication of McClelland-Winterbottom studies.Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 593A. (University Microfilms No. 74-14, 942.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack Demick
    • 1
  • Shinji Ishii
    • 2
  • Wataru Inoue
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySuffolk UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, School of EducationHiroshima UniversityHigashihiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Research Center for Educational Study and Practice, School of EducationHiroshima UniversityHigashihiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations