Prospects for Environmental Psychology in the Third Millennium

  • Kenneth H. Craik


Stokols (Chapter 23, this volume) has recognized the approach of the 21st century as a useful occasion to take stock of our field and its condition. I will organize my comments along a temporal dimension as well, with brief observations on forecasting trends in environment-behavior relations, forecasting trends in environmental psychology as a field of inquiry, and experiencing the current status of our field.


Ecological Psychology Mainstream Psychology Forecast Trend Surface Coal Mining Psychological Association Meeting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altman, I., & Rogoff B. (1987). World views in psychology and environmental psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols, & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology: Vol. 1 (pp. 7–40). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bosselmann, E, & Craik, K. H. (1987). Perceptual simulations of environments. In R. B. Bechtel, Robert W Marans, & W Michelson (Eds.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research (pp. 162–190). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  4. Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M., Craik, K. H., & Dake, K. M. (1986). Contemporary worldviews and perception of the technological system. In V. T. Covello, J. Menkes, & J. Mumpower (Eds.), Risk evaluation and management (pp. 93–130). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canter, D. Y., & Craik, K. H. (1981). Environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canter, D., Craik, K. H., & Griffiths, I. (1984). Environmental bridge-building. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (1993). When do individual differences matter? A paradoxical theory of personality coherence, Psychological Inquiry, 4, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Part II. Case study. A computational theory of social exchange. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craik, K. H. (1973). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 24, 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craik, K. H. (1977). Multiple scientific paradigms in environmental psychology. International Journal of Psychology, 12, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craik, K. H. (1984–85). The international context of environmental psychology: Comments on Professor Yamamoto’s paper. Hiroshima Forum for Psychology, 10, 70–71.Google Scholar
  14. Craik, K. H. (1987). Environmental psychology and its international character. Psychologie Francaise, 32, 17–21.Google Scholar
  15. Craik, K. H. (1985). Multiple perceived personalities: A neglected consistency issue. In E. E. Roskam (Ed.), Measurement and personality assessment (pp. 333–338). New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  16. Craik, K. H. (1993). Accentuated, revealed, and quotidian personalities. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 278–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Craik, K. H. (1994). Manifestations of individual differences in personality within everyday environments. In D. Bartussek & M. Amelang (Eds.), Fortschritte der Differentiellen Psychologie und Psychologischen Diagnostik: Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Kurt Pawlik (pp. 19–26). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  18. Craik, K. H. (1995). Environmental simulation and ‘The Real Thing,’ review of R. W Marans, & D. Stokols (Eds.), Environmental simulation: Research and policy. Contemporary Psychology, 40, 779–780.Google Scholar
  19. Craik, K. H. (1996a). Environmental psychology: A core field within psychological science. American Psychologist, 51.Google Scholar
  20. Craik, K. H. (1996b). The objectivity of persons and their lives: A noble dream for personality psychology? Psychological Inquiry, 7, 326–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dykstra, J. (1977). Miniature and mechanical special effects for “Star Wars.” American Cinematographer, 58, 702–705, 732, 742, 750-757.Google Scholar
  22. Emler, N. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. In W Stroebe (Ed.), European review of social psychology: Vol. 1 (pp. 171–193). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Kochen, M. (Ed.). (1989). The small world.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  24. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology.New York: McGraw.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyon, B. D. (Ed.). (1964). The high middle ages: 1000-1200.New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  27. Maddi, S. R. (1980). The uses of theorizing in personology. In E. Staub (Ed.), Personality: Basic aspects and current research (pp. 333–375). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Marans, R. W., & Stokols, D. (Eds.). (1993). Environmental simulation: Research and policy issues.New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  29. Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 59–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Murray, H. A. (1938). Proposals for a theory of personality. In H.A. Murray, Explorations in personality (pp. 36–141). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nicholas, D. (1992). The evolution of the medieval world: Society, government and thought, 312-1500.London: Longman.Google Scholar
  32. Stokols, D. (1995). The paradox of environmental psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 821–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Part I: Theoretical considerations. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior: Primate models. Albany, NY: SUNY. Press.Google Scholar
  35. Walsh, W. B., Craik, K. H., & Price, R. H. (Eds.). (1992). Person-environment psychology: Models and perspectives.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Wapner, S. (1987). A holistic, developmental, systems-oriented environmental psychology: Some beginnings. In D. Stokols, & I. Altman, (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 1433–1465). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Wapner, S. (1995). Toward integration: Environmental psychology in relation to other subfields of psychology. Environment and Behavior, 27, 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Webber, M. (1963). Order in diversity: Community without propinquity. In L. Wingo (Ed.), Cities and space: The future of land use: Essays from the Fourth RFF Forum (pp. 23–56). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wicker, A. W. (1979). An introduction to ecological psychology.Monterey, CA: Books/Cole.Google Scholar
  40. Wicker, A. W. (1985). Getting out of our conceptual ruts: Strategies for expanding conceptual frameworks. American Psychologist, 40, 1094–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, T. I. (1987). The history of invention.London: MacDonald & Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth H. Craik
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Personality and Social ResearchUniversity of California-BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations