Systems for Sustainability-or Sustainability for Systems?

  • J. Gilligan


Sustainability demands recognition of diversity. Recognition of diversity means admitting to that which is going on around us. The Systems Movement has too long been engaged in a self-referential discourse on methodologies developed for what have been usefully, if uncritically, defined as ‘Information Systems’. Despite attempts to broaden the agenda from the more traditional technical arena into the social realm, Data Processing, Management Information Systems and Requirements Analysis remain at the heart of most Information Systems practice and therefore in much of the associated epistemological and methodological development.


Management Information System System Movement Requirement Analysis Emergent Technology Audit Profession 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barto, Andrew G., Bradtke, Steven J. and Singh, Satinder P., 1995, Learning to act using real-time dynamic programming, Artificial Intelligence 72(1–2), pp. 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Checkland, P.B., 1981, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  3. Peters, Paul Evan <>, 1996, “General information about the Internet II Project”,
  4. Gilligan, J., 1994, Patterns on Glass: The Language Games of Information, Proceedings of the Conference on Philosophical and Logical Aspects of Information Systems, UWE, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. Wittgenstein, L, 1953, “Philosophical Investigations”, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Gilligan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Studies and MathematicsUniversity of the West of EnglandUK

Personalised recommendations