Business Analysis for Computing Purposes

One Analyst or Two?
  • David Bustard
  • Raymond Oakes
  • Desmond Vincent

Abstract

The goal of any computing-oriented systems analysis technique is (or at least should be) to identify where and how computing facilities can help to sustain the business concerned. Unfortunately, in practice, the analyst, because of his or her strong computing background, will often take it for granted that computing facilities are inherently beneficial and see the problem as one of identifying where such facilities can be used to best effect. Obviously this misses the potential for business improvement. More importantly, however, it can mean that the computing facilities are not adequately motivated by business needs, with detrimental results.

Keywords

Computing Facility Computing Development Soft System Methodology Computing Purpose Information System Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avison, D.E., and Wood-Harper, A.T., 1990, Multiview: An Exploration of Information Systems Development, Blackwell Scientific Publishers: Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Bustard, D.W., 1994, Progress towards RACE, a’ soft-centred’ requirements definition method, in: Software Quality and Productivity, (M. Lee, B-Z. Barta, and P. Juliff, eds.), pp. 29–36, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  3. Bustard, D.W., Oakes, R., and Heslin, E., 1993, Support for the integrated use of Conceptual and Dataflow Models in requirements specification, in: Proceedings of Colloquium on Requirements for Software Intensive Systems, pp. 37-44, DRA Malvern.Google Scholar
  4. Bustard, D.W., Dobbin, T.J., and Carey, B.N., 1996, Integrating Soft Systems and Object-Oriented Analysis, 2nd IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Colorado Springs, Colorado, pp. 52-59, IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bustard, D.W., and Lundy, P.J., 1995, Enhancing Soft Systems Analysis with formal modelling, 2nd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Symposium, York, pp. 164-171, IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bustard, D.W., and Lundy, P.J., 1996, Integrating Process Modelling and Soft Systems Analysis, in: Methods Integration, Leeds 1996, (A. Bryant, and L. Semmens, eds.), Springer (electronic Workshops in Computing).Google Scholar
  7. CCTA, 1993, Applying Soft Systems Methodology to an SSADM Feasibility Study, HMSO: London.Google Scholar
  8. CCTA, 1995, SSADM 4+, Blackwell Scientific Publishers: Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Checkland, P., and Scholes, J., 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, John Wiley and Sons: Chicester.Google Scholar
  10. Dobbin, T.J. and Bustard, D.W., 1994, Combining Soft Systems Methodology and Object-Oriented Analysis: The search for a good fit, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Information Systems Methodologies, Edinburgh, pp. 69-83.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, P.J., 1994, Informations Systems Development: Systems Thinking in the Field of Information Systems, Pitman: London.Google Scholar
  12. Stowell, F.A. (ed), 1994, Information Systems Provision: The Contributions of SSM, McGraw-Hill: Maidenhead.Google Scholar
  13. Wilson, B., 1990, Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications, 2nd Edition: John Wiley and Sons, Chicester.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Bustard
    • 1
  • Raymond Oakes
    • 2
  • Desmond Vincent
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Information and Software EngineeringUniversity of UlsterColeraineNorthern Ireland
  2. 2.Business Development ServiceNorthern Ireland Civil ServiceBelfastNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations