Concerning Computer-Based Support Tools for the User of the Soft Systems Methodology

  • P. J. Dunning-Lewis

Abstract

Wide interest in, and acceptance for, the using the soft systems methodology (SSM) in the development of information systems (Stowell, 1995; UKSS, 1992; Jayaratna, 1994; Lewis, 1994; Avison and Fitzgerald, 1995; Crowe, Beeby and Gammack, 1996; CCTA, 1993) has greatly increased awareness and use of the methodology. This growth in knowledge of SSM, often obtained through a secondary literature, inevitably leads to a change in the profile of the typical user of the methodology. Many new users will be less concerned with theoretical issues than the immediate, practical benefits that the methodology can provide, have had only limited, if any, supervised experience of the methodology’s use and be unaware of theoretical discussions concerning the methodology and its use. This can have benefits (for example, a more daring willingness to experiment and adapt the methodology) but there is also the danger that ideas may be misunderstood, misapplied, employed crudely or inappropriately. New users may also feel at times uncertain in their use of SSM (Moore, 1996)

Keywords

Support Tool Soft System Methodology Rich Picture Information System Development Supervise Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avison, D.E. and Fitzgerald G., 1995, Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, 2nd ed.: McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  2. Avison, D.E and Goldner, P., 1991, Tools Supporting Soft Systems, in: Systems Thinking in Europe, (M.C. Jackson, G.J. Mansell, R.L. Flood, R.B. Blackham and S.V.E. Probert, eds.), pp. 333–338, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avison, D.E., Shah, H. U., and Golder, P.A., 1993, Tools for SSM: a justification — a reply to ‘critique of two contributions to soft systems methodology’, European Journal of Information Systems 2(4):312–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CCTA, 1993, Applying Soft Systems Methodology to an SSADM Feasibility Study, HMSO: London.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P. and Scholes, J., 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Crowe, M., Beeby, R. and Gammack, J., 1996, Constructing Systems and Information: A Process View, McGraw-Hill: London.Google Scholar
  7. Davenport, M.S. and Ayers-Hunt, J., 1995, Soft Systems Analysis and Modelling Tool (SSAMT): Computer-Based Support for Conducting Soft Systems Studies, in: Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice (K. Ellis, A. Gregory, B.R. Mears-Young and G. Ragsdell, eds.) pp. 291–295, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jayaratna, N., 1994, Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies, McGraw-Hill: London.Google Scholar
  9. Kreher, H., 1993, Critique of two contributions to soft systems methodology, European Journal of Information Systems 2(4):304–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewis, P. J. 1992, Rich picture building in the soft systems methodology, European Journal of Information Systems 1(5):351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewis, P.J., 1993a, Linking soft systems methodology with data-focused information systems development, Journal of Information Systems 3 (3): p. 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis, P.J., 1993b, Towards an Interpretative Form of Data Analysis for the Soft Systems Methodology, in: Systems Science: Addressing Global Issues, (F.A. Stowell, D. West and J. G. Howell, eds.), pp. 391–396, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, P.J., 1993c, Identifying Cognitive Categories: the basis for Interpretative Data Analysis within Soft Systems Methodology, International Journal of Information Management 13 (5): pp. 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, P.J., 1994, Information Systems Development: Systems Thinking in the field of Information-Systems, Pitman: London.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, M., 1996, A learning experience with SSM — using Soft Systems Methodology for the first time in primary schools, OR Insight 9(2):13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stowell, F.A., 1995, (ed.), Information Systems Provision: The contribution of Soft Systems Methodology, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
  17. Stowell, F.A. and Stansfield, M., 1991, A First Step towards the Automation of SSM, in: Systems Thinking in Europe, (M.C. Jackson, G.J. Mansell, R.L. Flood, R.B. Blackham and S.V.E. Probert, eds.), pp. 319–325, Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tudor, D. J. and Tudor, I. J., 1995, Systems Analysis and Design: A comparison of Structured Methods, NCC Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. UK.SS, 1992, Information Systems Special Edition of The Systemist 14 (3), United Kingdom Systems Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Dunning-Lewis
    • 1
  1. 1.The Management SchoolLancaster UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations