A New Systems Methodology and Systemic Sustainability in an Engineering Company
  • Jack A. Castle
  • Shaun A. Spurrell


This paper describes progress with an action research programme dedicated to the development of a new systems methodology. CVAM was first described in detail by Castle (1995). Firmly placed within the interpretive paradigm it fulfils a particular need in integrating strategy and operational decision making. The literature of operations management urges us to consider trade offs and focused operations, yet only simple algorithms (Slack, Chambers, Harland, Harrison, and Johnston, 1995) and profiles (Hill, 1985) are on offer. CVAM is designed to assist managers with a guide to action in these areas. This paper first presents a brief overview of the new methodology as it stands now, in October 1996. The main findings of the action research carried out earlier in 1996 are then discussed in terms of the contribution they have made to its current state.


Operation Management Cross Correlation Analysis System Methodology Soft System Methodology Focus Operation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beer S., 1990, The Heart of Enterprise, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  2. Castle J.A., 1995, The Development of an integrating methodology for Strategic and Operations Management., The Proceedings of the British Academy of Management Annual Conference, Sheffield University, pp 454.Google Scholar
  3. Checkland P.B., 1981, Systems Thinking Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  4. Checkland P.B., and Casar A., 1986, Vickers’ concept of an appreciative system: A systemic account. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, vol. 13: 4–17.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland P.B., and Scholes J., 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Denzin, N., and Lincoln Y., 1994, Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  7. DePoy E, and Gitlin L., 1993, Introduction to Research, Multiple Strategies for Health and Human Services, Mosby, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  8. Goodwin P., and Wright G., 1991, Decision Analysis for Management Judgement, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  9. Hill T., 1985, Manufacturing Strategy, Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  10. Keeney R.L., and Raififa H., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Slack N., Chambers S., Harland C., Harrison A., and Johnston R., 1995, Operations Management, Pitman, London.Google Scholar
  12. Spurrell S. A., 1996, An investigation into using a new systems based methodology, CVAM for linking strategic and operations management. Dissertation submitted for the degree of Master of Business Administration. Bristol Business School, The University of the West of England.Google Scholar
  13. Thompson J. D., 1967, Organisations in Action, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack A. Castle
    • 1
  • Shaun A. Spurrell
    • 2
  1. 1.The School of Operations ManagementUniversity of the West of EnglandUK
  2. 2.Isopad Ltd.UK

Personalised recommendations