Skip to main content

Autopoiesis

In Search for a Theory of Organisational Change

  • Chapter
Systems for Sustainability

Abstract

By systemic (Bunge, 1983; 1983a; 1985; 1985a) is meant that the parts and the entire structure must be viewed in context. In systemic thinking, the main question is: What is the pattern which combine a given phenomenon or problem? The noticeable thing about patterns is that it is difficult to pinpoint cause and effect. A pattern can metaphorically be regarded as a circle, and a circle has no beginning or end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashby, W.R., 1968, Principles of the self-organizing system, in, W. Buckley (ed.). Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Aldine, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broady, D., 1991, Sociologi och Epistemologi: Om Pierre Bourdieus førfatterskap och den historiska epistemologin: HLS Førlag, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • BrÃ¥ten, S., 1984, The third position: Beyond artificial and autopoietic reduction, Kybernetes, 13: 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M., 1983, Exploring the World, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M., 1983a, Understanding the World, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M., 1985, Philosophy of Science and Technology, Part I: Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M., 1985a, Philosophy of Science and Technology, Part II, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, H.V., 1981, Observing Systems, Intersystems Publications: Seaside, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N., 1975, Sosiologische Aufklärung, Vol. 1–5: Westdeutcher Verlag, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhman, N., 1982, The world society as a social system. International Journal of General Systems, 8, pp. 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhman, N., 1986, The autopoiesis of social systems, in F. Geyer and J. Van der Zouven, (eds). Sociocybernetics paradoxes: observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems, pp.172–192, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhman, N., 1990, Essays on self reference, Columbia University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., 1981, Autopoiesis, in M. Zeleny, (ed.). Autopoiesis: a theory of living organization, pp. 21–23, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J., 1980, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel: Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., 1989, An introduction to autopoiesis: implications and applications, Systems Practice, 2 pp. 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, F., 1989, Cybernetics and supra human autopoetic systems, Systems Practice, 2 pp. 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, F., 1989a, The application of autopoietic systems to social organizations: a comment on John Mingers: an introduction to autopoiesis: implications and applications, Systems Practice, 2 pp. 349–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, F., 1992, Are institutions entities of a natural kind? a consideration of the outlook of mankind, in C.V. Negoita (ed.). Cybernetics and Applied Systems, pp. 149–163, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W., 1983, Critical heuristics of social planning: a new approach to practical philosophy, Haupl: Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W., 1986, Critical Heuristics of Social System Design, Working Paper 10; Department of Management Systems and Sciences, University of Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W., 1987, Critical heuristics of social systems design, European Journal of Operational Research, 31, pp. 276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W., 1988, System thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: a program for research, Systems Practice, 1, pp. 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.G., 1979, Principles of Biological Autonomy, Elsevier: New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johannessen, JA. (1997). Autopoiesis. In: Stowell, F.A., Ison, R.L., Armson, R., Holloway, J., Jackson, S., McRobb, S. (eds) Systems for Sustainability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0265-8_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0265-8_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0267-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0265-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics