The Contribution of Evaluation to Organizational Learning
The notion of organizational learning is a popular theme in the evaluation literature (Van der Knaap, 1995; Owen and Lambert, 1995). Whilst, traditionally, this work has been based on a rational-objectivist view, Van der Knaap has recently documented a paradigm shift in evaluation to argumentative-subjectivism. In the light of a discussion of self-producing systems, the argument will be advanced that the shift to argumentative-subjectivism will not promote the effectiveness of evaluation practice. Following a summary review of Stacey’s (1992, 1996) work on chaos and creativity, it will be proposed that the roles of ‘evaluator as judge’, as per rational-objectivism, and ‘evaluator as critic’, as per argumentative-subjectivism, are redundant.
KeywordsOrganizational Learning Chaos Theory Soft System Methodology Policy Theory Autopoietic System
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Mingers, J., 1984, Subjectivism and soft systems methodology — a critique. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 11: 85–103.Google Scholar
- Stacey, R. D., 1992, Managing the Unknowable: Strategic Boundaries Between Order and Chaos in Organizations, Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Stacey, R. D., 1996, Complexity and Creativity in Organizations, Berrett-Koehler Publishers: Inc., San Francisco.Google Scholar