Systemic Approaches and Contingent Actions in Consultancy Intervention

  • John Hassall

Abstract

When we attempt to employ systems approaches to confront real organisational problems, it becomes clear that a significant barrier to systemic intervention is the contingent nature of much action in these organisations. Because the actors (professionals, managers and consultants) are situated within a constraining cultural environment, they adopt action strategies which are reactive to this environment and which relate to normative assumptions about it (Dudley and Hassall, 1995 and 1996). Action and reaction to particular events in the immediate environment is a natural coping strategy. Doing “what we usually do” has the advantage of reducing the thinking and reaction time whilst ensuring survival. In this paper the term “contingent” is used for just those actions which arise from a developed repertoire based upon specific stimuli received from the environment.

Keywords

Contingent Action Systemic View Problem Context Soft System Methodology Total System Intervention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckford, J.L.W., 1995, Towards a Participative Methodology for Viable System Diagnosis, Systemist, Vol. 17(3) Aug 1995, By Word Publications, Fareham, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, S., 1979, The Heart of Enterprise, Wiley: Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Beer, S., 1985, Diagnosing the System For Organisations, Wiley: Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Berne, E., 1964, Games People Play, Grove Press: New York, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P., 1981, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley: Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Checkland, P., Scholes, J., 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley: Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Dawkings, R., 1988, The Blind Watchmaker, Penguin: London, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Dudley, P., Hassall, J.C., 1995, Systemic Refocusing Strategy, An Emancipatory Approach To Intervention, in: Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, (K. Ellis, A. Gregory, B.R. Mears-Young, G. Ragsdell, eds.), pp 465–478, Plenum, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dudley, P., Hassall, J.C., 1996, Applying Systemic Refocusing Strategy to Information Systems Innovation, in: Technology Management in a Changing World, (R.M. Mason, L.A. Lefebvre, T.M. Khalil, eds.), pp 41–50, Elsevier Advanced Technology, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Flood, R.L., 1996, Total Systems Intervention: Local Systemic Intervention, Research Memorandun No. 13, Centre for Systems Studies, Hull, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Handy, C., 1991, Waiting For The Mountain To Move, Hutchinson: London, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Kolb, D., 1984, Experiential Learning, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs N.J, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Revans, R, 1982, The Origins and Growth of Action Learning, Chartwell Bratt: UK.Google Scholar
  14. Weinstein, K., 1995, Action Learning A journey in Discovery and Development, HarperCollins: London, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Hassall
    • 1
  1. 1.Management Research Centre, Shropshire CampusUniversity of WolverhamptonPriorslee, TelfordUK

Personalised recommendations