Movement and Sustainability

Other Ways of Thinking about Environments
  • Ingrid Molderez

Abstract

When reading different sources in relation to sustainability, it is easy to become confused about the term and its definition. Think of “a sustainable growth rate” in finance, Michael Porter’s “sustainable competitive advantage” and “the sustainable use of natural resources” in environmental jargon. The concept of sustainability is one about which there is little agreement within literature although it is recognised that an economic and an ecological element play an important role in its conceptualisation. Most of the time these elements are perceived as divided, as separated, in which the economic one functions as internal and at the inside whereas the ecological one remains external and at the outside. Between the two there is a boundary that does not allow pollution. Instead, regarding the inside as the outside and vice versa (cf. Cooper, 1990) emphasizes the boundary that structures them. A boundary, or that which binds together, mainly stresses the need for each other. Boundaries shape the different elements which implies that the elements themselves need each other in order to exist. The idea that all these elements are only parts of a larger system is the thin red line that binds this paper.

Keywords

Sustainable Competitive Advantage Oxford English Dictionary Life Worth Living Ecological Interest Greek Myth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bertalanffy von L., 1971, General System Theory, Allen Lane: London.Google Scholar
  2. Bohm D., 1985, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Ark: London.Google Scholar
  3. Chia R., 1995, From modern to postmodern organizational analysis, Organization Studies, 16(4):579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chia R., 1996, The problem of reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a postmodern science of organization, Organization, 3(1):31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper R., 1983, The other. A model of human structuring, in: Beyond Method: A Study of Social Science Research Strategies, (G. Morgan, ed.), pp. 202–218, Sage, California.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper R., 1989, Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida’, Organization Studies, 10(4):479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper R., 1990, Organization/disorganization, in: The Theory and Philosophy of Organisations (J. Hassard and D. Pym, eds.), pp. 167–197, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper R., 1993, Technologies of representation, in: Tracing the Semiotic Boundaries of Politics, (P. Ahonen, ed.), pp. 279–312, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper R. and Law J., 1995, Organisation: distal and proximal views, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 13, pp. 237–274, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida J., 1981, Dissemination, [Translated and with an Introduction and Additional Notes by Barbara Johnson]: The Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Goodwin B., 1995, How the Leopard Changed its Spots, Phoenix Giant: London.Google Scholar
  12. Haraway D., 1990, A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980’s, in: Feminism/Postmodernism, (L. Nicholson, ed.), pp. 190–233, Routledge, New York and London.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger M., 1959, Introduction to Metaphysics, Yale University Press: New Haven.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence P.R. and Lorsch J.W., 1967, Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Graduate School of Business Administration: Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Lefebvre E., 1986, Elements of Human Organising. A Phenomenology of Person and Situation, University of Lancaster: Department of Behaviour in Organisations, PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
  16. Levin D.M., 1988, The Opening of Vision, Routledge: New York, London.Google Scholar
  17. Maslow A.H., 1954, Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row Publishers: New York, London.Google Scholar
  18. Redclift M., 1992, The meaning of sustainable development, Geoforum, 23(3):395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rotman B., 1994, Exuberant materiality — De-minding the store, Configurations, 2:251–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strathern M., 1991, Partial Connections, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Maryland.Google Scholar
  21. Strathern M., 1992, No nature, no culture: the Hagen case, in: Nature, Culture and Gender, (C. Maccormack and M. Strathern, eds.), pp. 174–222, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Vattimo G., 1988, The End of Modernity. Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-modern Culture, Polity Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Whitehead A.N., 1929, Process and Reality, Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid Molderez
    • 1
  1. 1.Limburg UniversityDiepenbeekBelgium

Personalised recommendations