Abstract
When reading different sources in relation to sustainability, it is easy to become confused about the term and its definition. Think of “a sustainable growth rate” in finance, Michael Porter’s “sustainable competitive advantage” and “the sustainable use of natural resources” in environmental jargon. The concept of sustainability is one about which there is little agreement within literature although it is recognised that an economic and an ecological element play an important role in its conceptualisation. Most of the time these elements are perceived as divided, as separated, in which the economic one functions as internal and at the inside whereas the ecological one remains external and at the outside. Between the two there is a boundary that does not allow pollution. Instead, regarding the inside as the outside and vice versa (cf. Cooper, 1990) emphasizes the boundary that structures them. A boundary, or that which binds together, mainly stresses the need for each other. Boundaries shape the different elements which implies that the elements themselves need each other in order to exist. The idea that all these elements are only parts of a larger system is the thin red line that binds this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bertalanffy von L., 1971, General System Theory, Allen Lane: London.
Bohm D., 1985, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Ark: London.
Chia R., 1995, From modern to postmodern organizational analysis, Organization Studies, 16(4):579–604.
Chia R., 1996, The problem of reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a postmodern science of organization, Organization, 3(1):31–59.
Cooper R., 1983, The other. A model of human structuring, in: Beyond Method: A Study of Social Science Research Strategies, (G. Morgan, ed.), pp. 202–218, Sage, California.
Cooper R., 1989, Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida’, Organization Studies, 10(4):479–502.
Cooper R., 1990, Organization/disorganization, in: The Theory and Philosophy of Organisations (J. Hassard and D. Pym, eds.), pp. 167–197, Routledge, London.
Cooper R., 1993, Technologies of representation, in: Tracing the Semiotic Boundaries of Politics, (P. Ahonen, ed.), pp. 279–312, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.
Cooper R. and Law J., 1995, Organisation: distal and proximal views, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 13, pp. 237–274, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.
Derrida J., 1981, Dissemination, [Translated and with an Introduction and Additional Notes by Barbara Johnson]: The Athlone Press, London.
Goodwin B., 1995, How the Leopard Changed its Spots, Phoenix Giant: London.
Haraway D., 1990, A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980’s, in: Feminism/Postmodernism, (L. Nicholson, ed.), pp. 190–233, Routledge, New York and London.
Heidegger M., 1959, Introduction to Metaphysics, Yale University Press: New Haven.
Lawrence P.R. and Lorsch J.W., 1967, Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Graduate School of Business Administration: Harvard University, Boston.
Lefebvre E., 1986, Elements of Human Organising. A Phenomenology of Person and Situation, University of Lancaster: Department of Behaviour in Organisations, PhD Dissertation.
Levin D.M., 1988, The Opening of Vision, Routledge: New York, London.
Maslow A.H., 1954, Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row Publishers: New York, London.
Redclift M., 1992, The meaning of sustainable development, Geoforum, 23(3):395–403.
Rotman B., 1994, Exuberant materiality — De-minding the store, Configurations, 2:251–214.
Strathern M., 1991, Partial Connections, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Maryland.
Strathern M., 1992, No nature, no culture: the Hagen case, in: Nature, Culture and Gender, (C. Maccormack and M. Strathern, eds.), pp. 174–222, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Vattimo G., 1988, The End of Modernity. Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-modern Culture, Polity Press: Cambridge.
Whitehead A.N., 1929, Process and Reality, Macmillan: New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Molderez, I. (1997). Movement and Sustainability. In: Stowell, F.A., Ison, R.L., Armson, R., Holloway, J., Jackson, S., McRobb, S. (eds) Systems for Sustainability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0265-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0265-8_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0267-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0265-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive