Sustainability and Systems Thinking

The Coevolution of Communities and Technological Infrastructures
  • Paul Jeffrey
  • Roger Seaton
  • Mark Lemon

Abstract

Unchecked technological development in general is at least partly responsible for some of the undesirable and survival threatening phenomena observed today. Problems of pollution, over-production, resource (and capital) concentration, restricted product lifecycles, and lack of social control, have all been attributed to ‘technology’. However, whilst there is general consensus regarding the role of technology in creating the problem, there are diverse attitudes towards its future contribution (the debate between the various positions is extensively developed by Gillot and Kumar, 1995).

Keywords

Urban System Water Recycling Sustainable Community Technology Type Demand Side Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, P.M., 1995, Self-organising spatial models; Integrated scenarios of regional development, Conf. on scenario development for regional planning in eastern China. Shanghai. Oct. 1995.Google Scholar
  2. Checkland, P., 1981, Systems Thinking Systems Practice, Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
  3. Gillot, J., and Kumar, M, 1995. Science and the Retreat from Reason, The Merlin Press, London.Google Scholar
  4. Glücklich, D., 1995, Water and the environment: Solutions with decentralised wastewater treatment. 2nd International Conference on Ecological Engineering for Wastewater Treatment. Wädenswil, Switzerland. 1995.Google Scholar
  5. Guy, S., and Marvin, S., 1995, Reconfiguring urban networks: the emergence of demand side management in the UK, J. Urb. Tech. 2: 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holland, J., 1975, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Jeffrey, P., 1996, The use of evolutionary analogies to investigate issues of sustainability: Putting a human face on survival, Futures 28: 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mill, J. S.,1875, A System of Logic, 9th Ed. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  9. Morgan, L. C, 1993, The Emergence of Novelty, Williams & Norgate: London.Google Scholar
  10. Murrer, J., and Bateman, G., 1996, Grey water treatment and reuse. Institute of Chemical Engineers conference on water recycling: technical and social implications. London. March 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Pankhania, M., Semmens, M. J., and Stephenson, T., 1994, Hollow fibre bioreactor for wastewater treatment using bubbleless membrane aeration, Water Research 28: 2233–2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pielou, E.C., 1975, Ecological Diversity. John Wiley and Sons: New York.Google Scholar
  13. Pye, R., 1978, A formal decision theoretic approach to flexibility and robustness. J. Op. Res. Soc. 29: 215–227.Google Scholar
  14. Shakun, M.F., 1981, Policy making and meaning as design of purposeful systems. Int. J. Gen. Sys. 7: 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Till, S., Judd, S.J., and McLoughlin, R., 1995, Crossflow microfiltration of secondary sewage effluent using extruded polymeric membranes, Proc. 1995 Inst. Chem. Engs. Research Event, pp219-221.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Jeffrey
    • 1
  • Roger Seaton
    • 1
  • Mark Lemon
    • 1
  1. 1.International Ecotechnology Research CentreCranfield UniversityCranfield, BedsUK

Personalised recommendations