Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proposed Solutions of the Paradox

  • Chapter
The Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox in Atomic, Nuclear, and Particle Physics

  • 222 Accesses

Abstract

There have been various attempts to explain the long-range interference effects predicted by quantum theory which appear to have been confirmed by experiments. Such attempts often involve a subquantal medium or ether that transmits the influence superluminally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, Found. Phys. 5, 93–109 (1975);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley,Found. Phys. 14, 255–274 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bohm, in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, (A. Van Der Merwe, et al, eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht (1988), pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. Vigier, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 24, 258–265 (1979).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. P. A. M. Dirac, Nature 169, 702 (1952).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195–200 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D10, 526–535 (1974).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. P. Stapr in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, (A. Van Der Merwe, et al, eds.) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988), pp. 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. Costa de Beauregard, Nuovo Cim. B 42, 41–64 (1977);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. O. Costa de Beauregard, Nuovo Cim. B B51, 267–279 (1979);

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O. Costa de Beauregard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 867–869 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. P. Stapr Nuovo Cim. B 29, 270–276 (1975);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. P. Stapr Am. J. Phys. 53, 306–317 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. W. C. Davidon, Quantum physics of single systems, Nuovo Cim. B36, 34–40 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Rayski, Evolution of Physical Ideas Towards Unification (Universitatis Iagellonicae Folia Physica, Krakow (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. W. Rietduk, Found. Phys. 11, 783–790 (1981);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. W. Rietduk, Nuovo Cim. B97, 111–117 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. G. Cramer, Phys. Rev. D22, 362–376 (1980).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. I. Sutherland, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 22, 377–384 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. Buonomano, Nuovo Cim. B57, 146–170 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. V. Buonomano, in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, (A. Van Der Merwe, et al, eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht (1988), pp. 67–76;

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. Buonomano, in:Found. Phys. Lett. 2, 565–568 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A180, 1–20 (1942).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467–188 (1982).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Mückenheim, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 35, 300–304 (1982);

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Mückenheim, Phys. Rep. 133, 339–381 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Maddox, Nature 320, 481 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. I. D. Ivanovic, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 22, 14–16 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Six, Phys. Lett. A150, 243–245 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Home, V L. Lepore, and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A158, 357–360 (1991).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Caser, Phys. Lett. A102, 152–158 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Garuccio and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A103, 99–103 (1984);

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A108, 197–202 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790–1793 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Risco Delgado, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Sevilla (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460–463 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. C. H. Thompson, Found. Phys. Lett. 9, 357–382 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. B. C. Gilbert and S. Sulcs, Found Phys. 26, 1401–1439 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. L. De La Pena and A. M. Cetto, The Quantum Dice: An Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Ferrero and E. Santos, Found. Phys. 27, 765–800 (1997).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. D. Hume, Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding (Clarendon, Oxford, 1963), quoted in Ref. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Einstein, The Born-Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London, 1971), pp. 170–171.

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. Einstein, in: Electrons et Photons—Rapports et Discussions du Cinquieme Conseil de Physique tenu ä Bruxelles du 24 au 29 Octobre 1927, Gauthiers-Villars, Paris, (1928), pp. 254–256.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Quoted by M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. S. Bell, letter to E. Santos, quoted in Ref. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  46. F. J. Belinfante, A Survey of Hidden-Variable Theories, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  47. K. Popper, in: Open Questions in Quantum Physics (G. Tarozzi, et al., eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht (1985), pp. 3–32.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Bedford and F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 42, 325–328 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London School of Economics, London, England

    Alexander Afriat

  2. University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Franco Selleri

Authors
  1. Alexander Afriat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franco Selleri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Afriat, A., Selleri, F. (1999). Proposed Solutions of the Paradox. In: The Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox in Atomic, Nuclear, and Particle Physics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0254-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0254-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0256-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0254-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation