Advertisement

Proposed Solutions of the Paradox

  • Alexander Afriat
  • Franco Selleri

Abstract

There have been various attempts to explain the long-range interference effects predicted by quantum theory which appear to have been confirmed by experiments. Such attempts often involve a subquantal medium or ether that transmits the influence superluminally.

Keywords

Variable Probability Local Realism Secondary Channel Standard Quantum Theory Heisenberg Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, Found. Phys. 5, 93–109 (1975);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1a.
    D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley,Found. Phys. 14, 255–274 (1984).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    D. Bohm, in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, (A. Van Der Merwe, et al, eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht (1988), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    J. P. Vigier, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 24, 258–265 (1979).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Nature 169, 702 (1952).MathSciNetADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195–200 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D10, 526–535 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    H. P. Stapr in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, (A. Van Der Merwe, et al, eds.) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988), pp. 367–378.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    O. Costa de Beauregard, Nuovo Cim. B 42, 41–64 (1977);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8a.
    O. Costa de Beauregard, Nuovo Cim. B B51, 267–279 (1979);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 8b.
    O. Costa de Beauregard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 867–869 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 9.
    H. P. Stapr Nuovo Cim. B 29, 270–276 (1975);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 9a.
    H. P. Stapr Am. J. Phys. 53, 306–317 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 10.
    W. C. Davidon, Quantum physics of single systems, Nuovo Cim. B36, 34–40 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 11.
    J. Rayski, Evolution of Physical Ideas Towards Unification (Universitatis Iagellonicae Folia Physica, Krakow (1995).Google Scholar
  16. 12.
    C. W. Rietduk, Found. Phys. 11, 783–790 (1981);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 12a.
    C. W. Rietduk, Nuovo Cim. B97, 111–117 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 13.
    J. G. Cramer, Phys. Rev. D22, 362–376 (1980).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 14.
    R. I. Sutherland, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 22, 377–384 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 15.
    V. Buonomano, Nuovo Cim. B57, 146–170 (1980).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 16.
    V. Buonomano, in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, (A. Van Der Merwe, et al, eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht (1988), pp. 67–76;Google Scholar
  22. 16a.
    V. Buonomano, in:Found. Phys. Lett. 2, 565–568 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 17.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A180, 1–20 (1942).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 18.
    R. P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467–188 (1982).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 19.
    W. Mückenheim, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 35, 300–304 (1982);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 19a.
    W. Mückenheim, Phys. Rep. 133, 339–381 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 20.
    J. Maddox, Nature 320, 481 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 21.
    I. D. Ivanovic, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 22, 14–16 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 22.
    J. Six, Phys. Lett. A150, 243–245 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 23.
    D. Home, V L. Lepore, and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A158, 357–360 (1991).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 24.
    S. Caser, Phys. Lett. A102, 152–158 (1984).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 25.
    A. Garuccio and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A103, 99–103 (1984);MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 25a.
    F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A108, 197–202 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 26.
    W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790–1793 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 27.
    R. Risco Delgado, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Sevilla (1997).Google Scholar
  36. 28.
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460–463 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 29.
    C. H. Thompson, Found. Phys. Lett. 9, 357–382 (1996).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 30.
    B. C. Gilbert and S. Sulcs, Found Phys. 26, 1401–1439 (1996).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 31.
    L. De La Pena and A. M. Cetto, The Quantum Dice: An Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996).Google Scholar
  40. 32.
    M. Ferrero and E. Santos, Found. Phys. 27, 765–800 (1997).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 33.
    D. Hume, Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding (Clarendon, Oxford, 1963), quoted in Ref. 32.Google Scholar
  42. 34.
    A. Einstein, The Born-Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London, 1971), pp. 170–171.Google Scholar
  43. 35.
    A. Einstein, in: Electrons et PhotonsRapports et Discussions du Cinquieme Conseil de Physique tenu ä Bruxelles du 24 au 29 Octobre 1927, Gauthiers-Villars, Paris, (1928), pp. 254–256.Google Scholar
  44. 36.
    Quoted by M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974), p. 116.Google Scholar
  45. 37.
    J. S. Bell, letter to E. Santos, quoted in Ref. 32.Google Scholar
  46. 38.
    F. J. Belinfante, A Survey of Hidden-Variable Theories, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1973).Google Scholar
  47. 39.
    K. Popper, in: Open Questions in Quantum Physics (G. Tarozzi, et al., eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht (1985), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 40.
    D. Bedford and F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 42, 325–328 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Afriat
    • 1
  • Franco Selleri
    • 2
  1. 1.London School of EconomicsLondonEngland
  2. 2.University of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations