Skip to main content

Abstract

The EPR paradox has evolved a good deal during the 35 years between the original paper of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen and Wigner’s probabilistic version of Bell’s inequality in 1970. It began as an experimentally impossible gedankenexperiment—with such physical idealizations as monochromatic plane waves and Dirac 8-functions—in which the fundamental reality criterion was formulated. Interference was not explicitly involved. Phase relations in configuration or tensor product spaces were given a central role by Furry and Schrödinger. Bohm simplified the paradox by reformulating it in terms of dichotomic observables regarding spin-½ particles, and addressed the experimental issue with Aharonov. Then in 1965 Bell deduced his celebrated inequality from the principles of local realism, and showed that it was grossly violated by quantum mechanical interference. Stronger inequalities and experiments to test them soon followed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48, 696–702 (1936).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Schrödinger, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. H. Furry, Phys. Rev. 49, 393–399 (1936).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. W. H. Furry, Phys. Rev. 49, 476 (1936).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Schrödinger, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 32, 446–452 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Fortunato, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 15, 289–290 (1976).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov, Phys. Rev. 108, 1070–1076 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. S. Wu and I. Shaknov, Phys. Rev. 77, 136 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Kasday, in: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (B. d’Espagnat, ed.), Italian Physical Society, Course IL, Academic Press, New York (1971), pp. 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. Jauch, in: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (B. d’Espagnat, ed.), Italian Physical Society, Course IL, Academic Press, New York (1971), pp. 20–55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Rev 176, 1715–1718 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. P. Stapr Nuovo Cim. B 29, 270–276 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. S. Bell, in: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (B. d’Espagnat, ed.), Italian Physical Society, Course IL, Academic Press, New York (1971), pp. 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195–200 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. E. P. Wigner, Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005–1009 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Afriat, A., Selleri, F. (1999). Early Formulations. In: The Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox in Atomic, Nuclear, and Particle Physics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0254-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0254-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0256-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0254-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics