Skip to main content
  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

The availability of the analogs cisplatin and carboplatin has sparked considerable controversy as to the relative merits of the two agents. A number of randomized clinical trials have been done that address this issue. As expected, most of these trials have been done in the tumor types that are the most responsive to these agents, ovarian and testis cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, M., Kerby, I. J., et al. (1989). A comparison of the toxicity and efficacy of cisplatin and carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer. Acta Oncol 28:57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alberts, D. S., Green, S., et al. (1992). Improved therapeutic index of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide: final report by the Southwest Oncology Group of a phase III randomized trial in stages III and IV ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:706.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bajorin, D. F., Sarosdy, M.F., et al. (1993). Randomized trial of etoposide and cisplatin versus etoposide and carboplatin in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors: a multiinstitutional study. J Clin Oncol 11: 598.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bokemeyer, Harstrick, C. A., et al. (1994). The use of carboplatin in malignant germ cell tumours. EurJ Cancer 30A: 721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, W. J., Nicholls. E. J., et al. (1992). The optimisation of carboplatin dose in carboplatin, etoposide and bleomycin combination chemotherapy for good prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis. Ann Oncol 3:29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, P. F., Bruzzone, M., et al. (1991). Carboplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide: a randomized trial in stage III–IV ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 9:658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonson, J. H., McCormack, G.M., et al. (1989). Cyclophosphamide-cisplatin versus cyclophosphamide-carboplatin in stage III–IV ovarian carcinoma: a comparison of equally myelosuppressive regimens. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group. (1991). Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: an overview of randomised clinical trials. Brit Med J 303: 884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, A. and Sleijfer, D. (1994). Carboplatin-based chemotherapy in good prognosis metastatic non-seminoma of the testis: an interim report of an MRC/EORTC randomised trial. Proc. Leeds Germ Cell Tumour Conference (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattan, J., Mahjoubi, M., et al. (1993). High failure rate of carboplatin-etoposide combination in good risk non-seminomatous germ cell tumours. EurJ Cancer 29A: 1504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mangioni, C., Bolis, G., et al. (1989). Randomized trial in advanced ovarian cancer comparing cisplatin and carboplatin. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. P., Hoskins, W. J., et al. (1993). A phase III trial comparing cisplatin/Cytoxan and cisplatin/Taxol in advanced ovarian cancer. Proc Amer Soc Clin Oncol 12: 255 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenerton, K., Jeffrey, J., et al. (1992). Cisplatin-cyclophosphamide versus carboplatin-cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized phase IE study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 10:718.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. E., Wiltshaw, E., et al. (1994). Long-term follow-up of the first randomized study of cisplatin versus carboplatin for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 12: 2066–2070.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ten Bokkel Huinink, W. W., van der Berg M. E. L., et al. (1988). Carboplatin in combination therapy for ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 15: 9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tjulandin, S. A., Garin, A. M., et al. (1993). Cisplatin-etoposide and carboplatin-etoposide induction chemotherapy for good-risk patients with germ cell tumors. Ann Oncol 4: 663–667.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermorken, J. B., ten Bokkel Huinink, W. W., et al. (1993). Carboplatin versus cisplatin. Ann Oncol 4: S41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, S.D. (1996). Cisplatin and Carboplatin in Testis and Ovarian Cancer: Pro Cisplatin. In: Pinedo, H.M., Schornagel, J.H. (eds) Platinum and Other Metal Coordination Compounds in Cancer Chemotherapy 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0218-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0218-4_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0220-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0218-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics