Abstract
In Chapter 11 we took two approaches to comparing the means of two samples. The first approach involved using each sample separately to estimate the mean of the population that the sample came from. We then attached error ranges for several confidence levels to these estimates and drew a picture of the whole thing with a bullet graph (Fig. 11.1). This approach is easily extended to the comparison of any number of samples. In this chapter we will use another fictitious example consisting of 127 Archaic period projectile points from the Cottonwood River valley. After considering possible sources of bias, we decide to work with these as a random sample from the large and vaguely defined population of Archaic projectile points from the Cottonwood River valley.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drennan, R.D. (1996). Comparing Means of More Than Two Samples. In: Statistics for Archaeologists. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0165-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0165-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45326-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0165-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive