End-To-End Programmability for QOS Controlled Mobility in ATM Networks and their Wireless Extension
- 65 Downloads
The main Quality of Service (QOS) challenge in a combined wireline/wireless ATM network derives from the combination of multi-rate multimedia connections with mobility. A connection with certain capacity reserved at a particular cell may have to be re-routed to another when the mobile device changes its location. The new path to the desired location may not have the original required capacity. Therefore re-negotiation of resources allocated to the connection is needed. At the same time, the flow (e.g., audio or video) should be transported and presented ‘seamlessly’ to the destination device with a smooth change of perceptual quality. In this paper we describe a distributed systems platform which takes end-to-end programmability for QOS controlled ATM mobility as its primary design goal. We use the term controlled QOS to distinguish it from hard QOS guarantees offered by fixed ATM networks. Implicit in the term is the notion that mobile flows can be represented as multi-resolution scalable flows at the mobile terminal.
KeywordsMobile Terminal Mobility Management Enhancement Layer Virtual Path Video Flow
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Raychaudhuri, D., (NEC USA), Dellaverson, L., (Motorola), Umehira, M., (NTT Wireless Systems), Mikkonen, J., (Nokia Mobile Phones), Phipps, T., (Symbionics), Porter, J., (Olivetti Research), Lind, C., (Telia Research) and Suzuki, H., (NEC CandC Research), “Scope and Work Plan for Proposed Wireless ATM Working Group”, ATM Forum Technical Committee, ATM Forum/96–0530/PLEN, April, 1996.Google Scholar
- 2.Raychaudhuri, D and Wilson, N.,“ ATM-Base Transport Architecture for Multiservice Wireless Personal Communications Networks”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 12., No. 8. October, 1994.Google Scholar
- 3.Porter, J., Hopper, A., Gilmurray, D., Mason, O., Naylon, J., and A. Jones, “The ORL Radio ATM System, Architecture and Implementation”, Technical Report, ORL Ltd, Cambridge, UK, January, 1996.Google Scholar
- 4.Agrawal, P., Hyden, E., Kryzanowski, P, Mishra, P., Srivatava, M., and J. Trotter., SWAN: A Mobile Multimedia Wireless Network, IEEE Personal Communications, April,1996.Google Scholar
- 5.Lazar, A.A., Bhonsle, S. and Lim, K.S., “A Binding Architecture for Multimedia Networks”, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, Vol. 30, Number 2, November 1995.Google Scholar
- 6.Campbell A. and Coulson G., “A QoS Adaptive Transport System: Design, Implementation and Experince”, Proc ACM Multimedia 96, Boston, 18–22 November, 1996.Google Scholar
- 7.Campbell, A., Hutchison, D. and C. Aurrecoechea, “Dynamic QoS Management for Scalable Video Flows”, Proc. Fifth International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, Durham, New Hampshire, 1995.an Francisco, USA April 1995.Google Scholar
- 8.Eleftheriadis, A., and D. Anastassiou, “Meeting Arbitrary QoS Constraints Using Dynamic Rate Shaping of Coded Digital Video”, Proceedings, 5th International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, Durham, New Hampshire, April 1995, pp. 95–106Google Scholar
- 9.Batra, P, and S-F Chang,“Content-Based Video Transmission over Wireless Channels”, Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications, Princeton, September 1996.Google Scholar
- 10.Nagshineh, M., and A. Acampora, “QOS Provisioning in Mirco-Cellular Networks Supporting Multimedia Traffic”, INFOCOM’95, Boston, April, 1995.Google Scholar
- 11.For information wireless media systems project and mobiware see http:// comet.ctr.columbia.edu/wireless/Google Scholar