Advertisement

Near-Field Measurement Models

  • Lester W. SchmerrJr.

Abstract

In Chap. 12 we derived a variety of measurement models using both a direct approach and an approach based on reciprocity relations. In either case we assumed that incident and scattered waves can be treated as quasi-plane waves modified by appropriate diffraction correction terms; the scattering amplitude was assumed to be slowly varying so that it could be evaluated along a fixed set of incident and scattered directions. Although the quasi-plane wave (or paraxial) approximation of the incident and scattered fields is typically a very good assumption even in the near field (see Chap. 8, Problem 8.4), the combination of this assumption with the slowly varying scattering amplitude assumption can cause the LTI models developed in Chap. 12 to break down throughout the near field. This breakdown is particularly severe for very specular scatterers (such as cracks or flat-bottom holes). In Chap. 13 we construct near-field measurement models based only on a high-frequency, small-flaw assumption. These models reduce to those previously found when the directions of waves and the scattering amplitude do not vary significantly from their values along a set of fixed rays in the transmission and reception processes.

Keywords

Main Beam Edge Wave Paraxial Approximation Kirchhoff Approximation Transducer Axis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. N. Lebedev, Special Functions and Their Applications (Dover, New York, 1972).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Sedov, L. W. Schmerr, and S. J. Song, Wave Motion 19 (1994) 159.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. J. Song, L. W. Schmerr, and A. Sedov, Res. Nondestr. Eval. 5 (1993) 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Wolf and E. W. Marchand, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54 (1964) 587.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. W. Marchand and E. Wolf, J. Opt Soc. Am. 56 (1966) 1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lester W. SchmerrJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations