Ocean Pulse pp 137-147 | Cite as

Fisheries Acoustics

Contribution and Challenge
  • R. B. Mitson

Abstract

The application of underwater acoustics to fisheries research has distinct features such that Fisheries Acoustics is a recognized branch of the science of sound. For decades the accent was on exploitation of the world’s fish stocks, leading to the development of large and powerful fishing vessels, equipped with sophisticated echo-sounders and sonars. Some stocks have now collapsed and many others are in imminent danger of doing so. The requirement is, for example, management of cod, haddock and yellowtail flounder in the George’s Bank area and the Canadian Maritime Provinces, so they can be restored to their former abundance. Conservation is now the key word in efforts to preserve this important source of food for the rapidly expanding world population. Fisheries acoustics play a vital role in this process by providing data for management purposes. Scientists and engineers continue to develop and refine this application of acoustics to the estimation of fish stock abundance.

Keywords

Target Strength Fish Behavior Skipjack Tuna Acoustic Survey Fishing News Book 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, G. P. and Metcalfe, J. D. (1989) Acoustic telemetry: progress and potential in understanding fish behavior. Proc. Inst. Acoustics (UK) 11(3): 96–103.Google Scholar
  2. Diner, N. and Masse. J. (1987) Fish school behavior during echo survey observed by acoustic devices. ICES CM. 1987/B:30;41pp.Google Scholar
  3. FAO (1995) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 41 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Foote, K. G. (1982) Optimizing copper spheres for precision calibration of hydroacoustic equipment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71: 742–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foote, K.G., Knudsen, H.P., Vestnes, G., MacLennan, D.N. and Simmonds, E.J. (1987) Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. Cooperative Research Report, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. 144. 69 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Godo, O.R. (1994) Factors affecting the reliability of groundfish abundance estimates from bottom trawl surveys. In: Marine Fish Behavior in Capture and Abundance Estimation, Eds. A. Ferno and S. Olsen. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Scientific Books, London. 166–195 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Greenlaw, CF. (1979) Acoustical estimation of Zooplankton populations. Limnological Oceanography 24: 226–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haralabous, J. and Georgakarakos, S. (1996) Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(2): 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holliday, D.V. (1977) Extracting bio-physical information from the acoustic signature of marine organisms. In Oceanic sound scattering prediction. pp.619-624. Eds. N.R. Andersen and B.J. Zahuranec. Plenum, NY.Google Scholar
  10. Holliday, D.V. and Pieper, R.E. (1995) Bioacoustical oceanography at high frequencies. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 52(3 and 4): 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ICES (1995) Underwater noise of research vessels: Review and recommendations. Cooperative Research Report Series. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. 209. 61 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Johannesson, K.A. and Mitson, R.B. (1983) Fisheries Acoustics: a practical manual for biomass estimation. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 240: 249 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Kay, B.J., Jones, D.K. and Mitson, R.B. (1991) FRV CORYSTES: A purpose-built fisheries research vessel. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London. Spring Meetings 1991, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Kimura, K. (1929) On the detection of fish groups by an acoustic method. J. Imperial Fisheries Institute, Japan, XXIV (2).Google Scholar
  15. Knudsen, H.P. (1990) The Bergen Echo Integrator: an introduction. J. Cons. in Explor. Mer, 47:167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacLennan, D.N. and Simmonds, E.J. (1992) Fisheries acoustics. Chapman and Hall. London, 325 pp.Google Scholar
  17. MacLennan, D.N. and Holliday, D.V. (1996) Fisheries and plankton acoustics: past, present, and future. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(2): 513–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitson, R. B. and Cook J.C. (1971) Shipboard installation and trials of an electronic sector scanning sonar. J. Rad. Electron. Eng. 41(8): 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitson R. B. and Storeton-West T. J. (1971) A transponding acoustic fish tag. J. Rad. Electron. Eng. 41(11): 483–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitson R.B., Storeton-West T.J., and Pearson, N.D. (1982) Trials of an acoustic transponding fish tag compass. Biotelemetry, 9: 69–79.Google Scholar
  21. Mitson, R.B. (1983) Fisheries Sonar, Fishing News Books Ltd. Farnham, Surrey, England, 287 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Mitson, R.B., Simard, Y, and Goss, C. (1996) Use of a two-frequency algorithm to determine size and abundance of plankton in three widely spaced locations. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(2): 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olsen, K. Angell, J., Pettersen, F., and Lovik A. (1983) Observed fish reactions to a surveying vessel with special reference to herring, cod, capelin and polar fish. In Symposium on Fisheries Acoustics, Bergen, Norway. Eds. O. Nakken and S.C. Venema. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 300: 131-138.Google Scholar
  24. Ona, E. and Mitson, R.B. (1996) Acoustic sampling and signal processing near the seabed: the deadzone revisited. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pope, J. G. (1982) User requirements for the precision and accuracy of acoustic surveys. ICES Symp. on Fisheries Acoustics. June 1982, Bergen, Norway. Paper 84.Google Scholar
  26. Simmonds, E.J., Armstrong, F. and Copland, P.J. (1996) Species identification using wideband backscatter with neural network and discriminant analysis. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(2): 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Storeton-West T.J., Mitson R.B. and Greer Walker M. (1978) Fish heart rate telemetry in the open sea using sector scanning sonar. Biotelemetry 5: 149–153.Google Scholar
  28. Sund, O. (1935) Echo sounding in fisheries research. Nature 135: 953–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuen, H.S.H. (1970) Behavior of skipjack tuna, Katsuwonu spelamis as determined by tracking with ultrasonic devices. J. Fish Res. Bd. Can. 27(11).Google Scholar
  30. Zakharia, M.E., Magand, F., Hetroit, F. and Diner, N. (1996) Wideband sounder for fish species identification at sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(2): 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. B. Mitson
    • 1
  1. 1.ACOUSTECLowestoft, SuffolkUK

Personalised recommendations