Control

Cognitive and Motivational Implications
  • Lawrence C. Perlmuter
  • Angela S. Eads
Part of the The Springer Series in Adult Development and Aging book series (SSAD)

Abstract

With the exception of the pioneering interventional studies of Langer and Rodin (1976; Rodin & Langer, 1977; Rodin, Timko, & Harris, 1985), most of the research that has investigated the relationship between perceptions of control and aging have utilized self-reports to determine the extent to which advancing age is associated with changes in perceived control (Blanchard-Fields & Robinson, 1987). Although the self-report procedure is sound in itself, it may have peculiar limitations with respect to assessing age-related changes in perceived control; that is, when individuals are asked to respond to specific questions or scenarios that depict control, older individuals may respond differently than younger individuals to these inquiries, not because their perception of control has changed, but rather because the particular scenario or question may be lacking in appropriateness for either group. Thus, the requisite standardization procedures involved in test construction (i.e., presenting the respondent with a topic for judgment) may limit test validity. In other words, if young and old respondents answer a given question differently, is it because they perceive more or less control, or is the stem of the test item differentially appropriate to young or old individuals? As a result of the potential limitations surrounding exclusive reliance on self-reports, we primarily utilize experimental paradigms that examine how choice and control affect motivation and performance in younger and older individuals. We examine laboratory as well as field studies and propose some principles that may be useful in enhancing the perception of control in the elderly.

Keywords

Target Word Recognition Accuracy Paired Associate Choice Condition Choice Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, A. (1929). The science of living. New York: Greenburg.Google Scholar
  2. Aldwin, C. M. (1991). Does age affect the stress and coping process? Implications of age differences in perceived control. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 174–180.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, K. S. (1995). Individual differences moderate the effects of choice in performance of kindergarten children. Unpublished master’s thesis, Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, R., & Rodin, J. (1978). Perceived control and crowding stress. In A. Baum, J. E. Singer, & S. Valins (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology (pp. 145–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchard-Fields, F., & Robinson, S. L. (1987). Age differences in the relationship between controllability and coping. Journal of Gerontology, 52, 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewin, C. R., & Bradley, C. (1989). Patient preferences and randomized clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 299, 313–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burger, J. M. (1989). Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 246–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eads, A. S. (1996). The effects of choice on performance and motivation in elderly individuals. Unpublished master’s thesis, Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  10. Harvey, J. H., & Johnston, S. (1973). Determinants of the perception of control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 164–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  13. Kimble, G. A., & Perlmuter, L. C. (1970). The problem of volition. Psychological Review, 77, 361–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleigl, R., & Lindenberger, U. (1978). Age differences in processing relevant versus irrelevant stimuli in multiple item recognition learning. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuhl, J. (1986). Aging and models of control: The hidden costs of wisdom. In M. M. Baltes & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), The psychology of control and aging (pp. 1–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Lachman, M. E., & Leff, R. (1989). Perceived control and intellectual functioning in the elderly: A five year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 25, 722–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  21. Monty, R. A., Geller, E. S., Savage, R. E., & Perlmuter, L. C. (1979). The freedom to choose is not always so choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monty, R. A., & Perlmuter, L. C. (1972). The role of choice in learning as a function of meaning and between and within subject designs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Monty, R. A., Rosenberger, M. A., & Perlmuter, L. C. (1973). Amount and locus of choice as sources of motivation in paired associates learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nathan, D. M., Singer, D. E., Godine, J. E., Harrington, C., & Perlmuter, L. C. (1986). Retinopathy in older type II diabetics: Association with glucose control. Diabetes, 35, 797–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orne, C. M., & Binik, Y. M. (1989). Consistency in adherence across diabetic regimen demands. Health Psychology, 8, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perlmuter, L. C. (1991). Choice enhances performance in non-insulin-dependent diabetics and controls. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 218–223.Google Scholar
  27. Perlmuter, L. C., & Langer, E. J. (1982). The effects of behavioral monitoring on the perception of control. Clinical Gerontologist, 1, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. (1977). The importance of perceived control: Fact or fantasy?. American Scientist, 65, 759–765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. (1982). Contextual effects on learning and memory. Rulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 290–292.Google Scholar
  30. Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. (1989). Motivation and aging. In L. W. Poon, D. C. Rubin, & B. S. Wilson (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life (pp. 373–393). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Perlmuter, L. C., Monty, R. A., & Chan, F. (1986). Choice, control, and cognitive functioning. In M. M. Baltes & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), The psychology of control and aging (pp. 91–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Perlmuter, L. C., Scharff, K., Karsh, R., & Monty, R. A. (1980). Perceived control: A generalized state of motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 4, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rakowski, W., & Hickey, T. (1992). Mortality and the attribution of health problems to aging among older adults. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 1139–1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rand, L. I., Krolewski, A. S., Aiello, L. M., Warram, J. H., Baker, R. S., & Maki, T. (1985). Multiple factors in the prediction of risk of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1433–1438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodin, J., & Langer, E. J. (1977). Long-term effects of a control relevant intervention with the institutionalized aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 897–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodin, J., Timko, S., & Harris, S. (1985). The construct of control: Biological and psychological correlates. Annual Review of Gerontology, 5, 3–55.Google Scholar
  37. Rollnick, M., & Morgan, M. (1995). Motivational interviewing—increasing readiness for change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. Savage, R. E., Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. (1979). Effect of reduction in the amount of choice and the perception of control on learning. In L. C. Perlmuter & R. A. Monty (Eds.), Choice and perceived control (pp. 91–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Schmidt, A. J. M. (1985). Cognitive factors in the performance level of chronic low back pain patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 183–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schultz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1996). A life span theory of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51, 702–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shute, V. J. (1993). A macroadaptive approach to tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4, 61–93.Google Scholar
  42. Steiner, I. D. (1979). Three kinds of reported choice. In L. C. Perlmuter & R. A. Monty (Eds.), Choice and perceived control (pp. 21–22). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Stotland, E., & Blumenthal, A. (1964). The reduction of anxiety as a result of the expectation of making a choice. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18, 139–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Takahashi, M. (1992). Memorial consequences of choosing nonwords: Implications for interpretations of the self-choice effect. Japanese Psychological Research, 34, 35–38.Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, S., & Loebl, M. (1990). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96, 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turner, M. L. (1994). Increasing the perception of control and its effects on performance in learning disabled children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  47. Wallston, K. A. (1989). Assessment of control in health care settings. In A. Steptoe & A. Appels (Eds.), Stress, personal care, and health (pp. 85–105). Brussels, Belgium: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement, motivation, and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: Gerald Learning Press.Google Scholar
  49. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams, G. C., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Ruilding partnerships by supporting autonomy: Promoting maintained behavior change and positive health outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence C. Perlmuter
    • 1
  • Angela S. Eads
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFinch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical SchoolNorth ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations