Advertisement

Time and Energy: The Ecological Context for the Evolution of Bipedalism

  • Robert A. Foley
  • Sarah Elton

Abstract

This paper is concerned with explanations for the evolution of bipedalism. Its general point is a very simple one—that the occurrence of bipedalism is context specific. The pattern of hominid evolution, as much as that of any other lineage, reflects the costs and benefits of the way an animal is structured and behaves, and this ratio is entirely dependent upon when and where it is occurring. Historically the context for bipedalism has been the general characteristics of the environment—savanna grasslands, open environments, patchy woodland versus forest. This remains important, but here we shall add a new consideration, that of time budgets, which provides a more specific ecological context for considering the energetics of bipedalism.

Keywords

Energetic Cost Modern Human Time Budget Ecological Context Feeding Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello LC, and MC Dean (1990) An Introduction to Human Evolutionary Anatomy. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke RJ (1985) Australopithecus and early Homo in southern Africa. In E Delson (ed.): Ancestors: the Hard Evidence. New York: Alan Liss, pp. 171–177.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin C (1871) Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunbar RIM (1992) Time: A hidden constraint on the behavioral ecology of baboons. Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 31:35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elton S, Foley RA, and Ulijaszek SJ (in press) How much does it cost a human biped to climb and clamber? Ann. Hum. Biol.Google Scholar
  6. Foley RA (1987) Another Unique Species: Patterns of Human Evolutionary Ecology. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Foley RA (1992) Evolutionary ecology of fossil hominids. In EA Smith and B Winterhaider (eds.): Evolutionary Ecology and Human behavior. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 131–164.Google Scholar
  8. Foley RA(1995) Humans Before Humanity: An Evolutionary Perspective. Oxford: Blackwells Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Grine FE, Editor (1989) The Evolutionary History of the “Robust” Australopithecines. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Hunt KD (1996) The postural feeding hypothesis — an ecological model for the evolution of bipedalism. S. Afr. J. Sci. 92:77–90.Google Scholar
  11. Hunt KD (this volume) Ecological morphology of Australopithecus afarensis: Traveling terrestrially, eating arboreally. In E Strasser, JG Fleagle, AL Rosenberger, and HM McHenry (eds.): Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 397-418.Google Scholar
  12. Isbell LA, and Young TP (1996) The evolution of bipedalism in hominids and reduced group-size in chimpanzees — alternative responses to decreasing resource availability. J. Hum. Evol. 30:389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jablonski NG, and Chaplin G (1993) Origin of habitual terrestrial bipedalism in the ancestor of the Hominidae. J. Hum. Evol. 24:259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jungers WL (1982) Lucy’s limbs: Skeletal allometry and locomotion in Australopithecus afarensis. Nature 297:676–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leakey MG, Feibel CS, McDougall I, and Walker A (1995) New four million year old hominid species from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya. Nature 376:565–571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leonard WR, and Robertson ML (1997) Rethinking the energetics of bipedalism. Curr. Anthropol. 38:304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lovejoy CO (1979) A reconstruction of the pelvis of AL-288 (Hadar Formation). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 50:460.Google Scholar
  18. Lovejoy CO (1980) Hominid origins: The role of bipedalism. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 52:250.Google Scholar
  19. Maynard Smith J (1978) Optimization theory in evolution. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9:31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newman RW (1970) Why man is such a sweaty and thirsty naked animal: A speculative review. Hum. Biol. 42:12–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Peters CR, and Blumenschine R (1995) Landscape perspectives on possible landuse patterns for early hominids in the Olduvai Basin. J. Hum. Evol. 29:321–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reader J (1988) Missing Links. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
  23. Reed KE (1997) Early hominid evolution and ecological change through the African Plio-Pleistocene. J. Hum. Evol. 32:289–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodman PS (1984) Foraging and social systems of orangutans and chimpanzees. In PS Rodman and JGH Cant (eds.): Adaptations for Foraging in Non-Human Primates. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 134–160.Google Scholar
  25. Rodman PS, and McHenry HM (1980) Bioenergetics and origins of bipedalism. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 52:103–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Senut B, and Tardieu C (1985) Functional aspects of Plio-Pleistocene hominid limb bones: Implications for phylogeny and taxonomy. In E Delson (ed.): Ancestors: The Hard Evidence. New York: Alan Liss, pp. 193–201.Google Scholar
  27. Steudel K (1994) Locomotor energetics and hominid evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 3:42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Susman RL, and Brain TM (1988) New first metatarsal (SKX5017) from Swartkrans and the gait of Paranthropus robustus. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 77:7–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taylor CR, and Rowntree VJ (1973) Running on two legs or four: Which consumes more energy. Science 179:186–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tuttle RH, Hallgrímsson B, and Stein T (this volume) Heel, squat, stand, stride: Function and evolution of hominoid feet. In E Strasser, JG Fleagle, AL Rosenberger, and HM McHenry (eds.): Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 435-448.Google Scholar
  31. Ulijaszek SJ (1995) Human Energetics in Biological Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Walker AC, and Leakey RE, Editors (1993) The Nariokotome Skeleton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wheeler P (1984) The evolution of bipedality and loss of functional body hair in hominids. J. Hum. Evol. 13:91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wheeler P (1985) The loss of functional body hair in man: The influence of thermal environment, body form and bipedality. J. Hum. Evol. 14:23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wheeler PE (1991a) The influence of bipedalism on the energy and water budgets of early hominids. J. Hum. Evol. 21:117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wheeler PE (1991b) The thermoregulatory advantages of hominid bipedalism in open equatorial environments: The contribution of increased convective heat loss and cutaneous evaporative cooling. J. Hum. Evol. 21:107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. White TD, Suwa G, and Asfaw B (1994) Australopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia. Nature 371:306–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williamson D (1997) Hominid Socioecology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Foley
    • 1
  • Sarah Elton
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Evolutionary Biology Research Group, Department of Biological AnthropologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations