Scientists these days tend to keep up a polite fiction that all science is equal. Except for the work of the misguided opponent whose arguments we happen to be refuting at the time, we speak as though every scientist’s field and methods of study are as good as every other scientist’s, and perhaps a little better. This keeps us all cordial when it comes to recommending each other for government grants.
KeywordsInductive Inference Logical Tree Multiple Hypothesis Strong Inference Crucial Experiment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Notes
- Bacon, F., 1960, The New Organon and Related Writings. Liberal Arts Press: New York. Especially pp. 98, 112, 151, 156, 196.Google Scholar
- Chamberlin, T.C., 1897, 5:837. Journal of Geology I am indebted to Professors Preston Cloud and Bryce Crawford, Jr., of the University of Minnesota for correspondence on this article and a classroom reprint of it.Google Scholar
- Chew, G.F., Gell-Mann, M, and Rosenfeld, A.H., 1964, Scientific American 210 (Feb.):74: 210, (Apr.):60, 210, (June):54.Google Scholar
- Faraday, M., 1932–36, Faraday’s Diary 1820–62. Bell, London.Google Scholar
- Platt, J.R., 1962, The Excitement of Science. Houghton Mifflin: Boston. See especially Chapters 7 and 8.Google Scholar
- Polya, G., 1954, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Vols. 1 and 2. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Popper, K.R., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, p. 41 Basic Books: New York. A modified view is given by Kuhn, T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, p. 146. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. It does not, I believe, invalidate any of these conclusions.Google Scholar
- Rich, A., 1959, in Biophysical Science: A Study Program, edited by J.L. Oncley et ai, Wiley, New York. p. 191.Google Scholar
- Wheland, G.W., 1949, Advanced Organic Chemistry. Wiley: New York. See Chapter 4 for numerous such examples.Google Scholar