The Early Evolution of the Hominoid Face

  • Todd C. Rae
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)


In phylogenetic analyses of hominoid primates, the face as an anatomical unit has often been considered to be of secondary importance in comparison with dental and postcranial evidence (e.g., Andrews and Martin, 1987), related both to the abundance of teeth in the fossil record and to the predominance of postcranial characteristics in diagnoses of the superfamily (e.g., Harrison, 1987). Recent fossil discoveries and the adoption of more rigorous phylogenetic methods, however, provide an opportunity to document more fully the evolution of the hominoid facial skeleton and to decipher the phylogenetic signal contained within this important anatomical region.*


Extant Taxon Fossil Taxon Extinct Taxon Incisive Canal Incisive Foramen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrews, P. 1978. A revision of the Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol. 30: 85–224.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, P. 1985. Family group systematics and evolution among catarrhine primates. In: E. Delson (ed.), Ancestors: The Hard Evidence, pp. 14–22. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, P. 1986. Fossil evidence on human origins and dispersal. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 51: 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, P., and Martin, L. 1987. The phyletic position of the Ad Dabtiyah hominoid. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol. 41: 383–393.Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, P., and Tekkaya, I. 1980. A revision of the Turkish Miocene hominoid Sivapithecus meteai. Paleontology 23: 85–95.Google Scholar
  6. Archie, J. 1989. Homoplasy excess ratios: New indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogenetic systematics and a critique of the consistency index. Syst. Zool. 38: 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ax, P. 1985. Stem species and the stem lineage concept. Cladistics 1: 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Begun, D. 1987. A Review of the Genus Dryopithecus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  9. Begun, D. 1992. Miocene fossil hominids and the chimp-human clade. Science 257: 1929–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilsborough, A. 1971. Evolutionary change in the hominoid maxilla. Man 6: 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bishop, W. 1963. The later Tertiary and Pleistocene in Eastern Equatorial Africa. In: F. Howell and F. Bourliere (eds.), African Ecology and Human Evolution, pp. 246–275. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Bishop, W., Miller, J., and Fitch, F. 1969. New potassium-argon age determinations relevant to the Miocene fossil mammal sequence in east Africa. Am. J. Sci. 267: 669–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonis, L. de, Bouvrain, G., Geraads, D., and Koufos, G. 1990. New hominid skull material from the late Miocene of Macedonia in northern Greece. Nature 345: 712–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boschetto, H., Brown, F., and McDougall, I. 1992. Stratigraphy of the Lothidok Range, northern Kenya, and K/Ar ages of its Miocene primates. J. Hum. Evol. 22: 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, W. E. L., and Leakey, L. 1951. The Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Fossil Mamm. Afr. 1: 1–117.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, W. E. L., and Thomas, D. 1951. Associated jaws and limb bones of Limnopithecus macinnesi. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Fossil Mamm. Afr. 3: 1–27.Google Scholar
  17. Conover, W. J., and Iman, R. L. 1981. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am. Stat. 35: 124–129.Google Scholar
  18. Corruccini, R., and Henderson, A. 1978. Palato-facial comparison of Dryopithecus (Proconsul) with extant catarrhines. Primates 19: 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Drake, R., Van Couvering, J., Pickford, M., Curtis, G., and Harris, J. 1988. New chronology for the Early Miocene mammalian faunas of Kisingiri, western Kenya. J. Geol. Soc. London 145: 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farris, J. 1988. Hennig86,computer program and manual. Port Jefferson Station (distributed by author).Google Scholar
  21. Farris, J. 1989a. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Syst. Zool. 38: 406–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farris, J. 1989b. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleagle, J. 1975. A small gibbon-like hominoid from the Miocene of Uganda. Folia Primatol. 24: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleagle, J. 1986. The fossil record of early catarrhine evolution. In: B. Wood, L. Martin, and P. Andrews (eds.), Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, pp. 130–149. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  25. Fleagle, J. 1988. Primate Adaptation and Evolution. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Ford, S. 1986. Systematics of the New World monkeys. In: D. Swindler and J. Erwin (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1: Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy, pp. 73–135. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Gauthier, J., Kluge, A., and Rowe, T. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4: 105–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gu, Y., and Lin, Y. 1983. First discovery of Dryopithecus in east China. Acta Anthropol. Sin. 2: 305–314.Google Scholar
  29. Harrison, T. 1982. Small-Bodied Apes from the Miocene of East Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, T. 1987. The phylogenetic relationships of the early catarrhine primates: A review of the current evidence. J. Hum. Evol. 16: 41–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrison, T. 1988. A taxonomic revision of the small catarrhine primates from the early Miocene of East Africa. Folia Primatol. 50: 59–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopwood, A. 1933. Miocene primates from British East Africa. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 11: 96–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hylander, W., and Johnson, K. 1992. Strain gradients in the craniofacial region of primates. In: Z. Davidovitch (ed.), The Biological Mechanisms of Tooth Movement and Craniofacial Adaptation, pp. 559–569. Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus.Google Scholar
  34. Kluge, A., and Farris, J. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Larson, S. 1992. Are the similarities in forelimb morphology among the hominoid primates due to parallel evolution ? Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 14: 106.Google Scholar
  36. Leakey, L. 1963. East African fossil Hominoidea and the classification within this superfamily. In: S. Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution, pp. 32–49. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. Leakey, R., Leakey, M., and Walker, A. 1988a. Morphology of Afropithecus turkanensis from Kenya. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 76: 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leakey, R., Leakey, M., and Walker, A. 1988b. Morphology of Turkanapithecus kalakolensis from Kenya. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 76: 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li, C. 1978. A Miocene gibbon-like primate from Shihhung, Kiangsu Province. Vertebr. Palasiat. 16: 187–192.Google Scholar
  40. McDougall, I., and Watkins, R. 1985. Age of hominoid-bearing sequence at Buluk, northern Kenya. Nature 318: 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maclnnes, D. 1943. Notes on the east African Miocene primates. J. East. Afr. Uganda Nat. Hist. Soc. 18: 141–181.Google Scholar
  42. Madden, C. 1980. New Proconsul (Xenopithecus) from the Miocene of Kenya. Primates 21: 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maddison, W., Donoghue, M., and Maddison, D. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33: 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moyà-Solà, S., and Köhler, M. 1993. Recent discoveries of Dryopithecus shed new light on evolution of great apes. Nature 365: 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Napier, J., and Davis, P. 1959. The fore-limb skeleton and associated remains of Proconsul africanus. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Fossil Mamm. Afr. 16: 1–69.Google Scholar
  46. Nengo, I. O., and Rae, T. 1992. New hominoid primates from the early Miocene site of Songhor, Kenya. J. Hum. Evol. 23: 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nixon, K., and Carpenter, J. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics 9: 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pickford, M. 1986. Cainozoic paleontological sites of western Kenya. Muencher Geowiss. Abh. Ser. A 8: 1–151.Google Scholar
  49. Pilbeam, D. 1969. Tertiary Pongidae of east Africa: Evolutionary relationships and taxonomy. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 31: 1–185.Google Scholar
  50. Pilbeam, D. 1982. New hominoid skull from the Miocene of Pakistan. Nature 295: 232–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pilbeam, D., Rose, M., Barry, J., and Shah, S. M. I. 1990. New Sivapithecus humeri from Pakistan and the relationship of Sivapithecus and Pongo. Nature 348: 237–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Platnick, N. 1989. An empirical comparison of microcomputer parsimony programs, II. Cladistics 5: 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pogue, M., and Mickevich, M. 1990. Character definitions and character state delineation: The bête noire of phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 6: 319–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Preuss, T. 1982. The face of Sivapithecus indicus: Descriptions of a new, relatively complete specimen from the Siwaliks of Pakistan. Folia Primatol. 38: 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rae, T. 1993. Phylogenetic Analysis of Proconsulid Facial Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  56. Rae, T., and Simons, E. 1992. The significance of the facial morphology of Aegyptopithecus. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 14: 134.Google Scholar
  57. Rak, Y. 1983. The Australopithecine Face. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Rohlf, F. 1982. BIOM: A package of statistical programs to accompany the text Biometry. Stony Brook (distributed by author).Google Scholar
  59. Rose, M. 1983. Miocene hominoid postcranial morphology: Monkey-like, ape-like, neither, or both? In: R. Ciochon and R. Corruccini (eds.), New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry, pp. 405–417. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmitt, D. 1991. Strepsirhine humeral head morphology and its implications for notharctine locomotion. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 12: 159.Google Scholar
  61. Simon, C. 1983. A new coding procedure for morphometric data with an example from periodical cicada wing veins. In: J. Felsenstein (ed.), Numerical Taxonomy, pp. 378–382. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simons, E., and Pilbeam, D. 1965. Preliminary revision of the Dryopithecinae (Pongidae; Anthropoidea). Folic Primatol. 3: 81–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Slowinski, J. 1993. “Unordered” versus “ordered” characters. Syst. Biol. 42:155–165.Google Scholar
  64. Sokal, R., and Rohlf, F. 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  65. Strasser, E., and Delson, E. 1987. Cladistic analysis of cercopithecid relationships. J. Hum. Evol. 16: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Szalay, F., and Delson, E. 1979. The Evolutionary History of the Primates. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  67. Teaford, M., Beard, K., Leakey, R., and Walker, A. 1988. New hominoid facial skeleton from the early Miocene of Rusinga Island, Kenya, and its bearing on the relationship between Proconsul nyanzae and Proconsul africanus. J. Hum. Evol. 17: 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walker, A., and Teaford, M. 1989. The hunt for Proconsul. Sci. Am. 260: 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walker, A., Teaford, M., Martin, L., and Andrews, P. 1993. A new species of Proconsul from the early Miocene of Rusinga/Mfangano Islands, Kenya. f Hum. Evol. 25: 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ward, S., and Kimbel, W. 1983. Subnasal alveolar morphology and the systematic position of Sivapithecus. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 61: 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ward, S., and Pilbeam, D. 1983. Maxillofacial morphology of Miocene hominoids from Africa and Indo-Pakistan. In: R. Ciochon and R. Corruccini (eds.), New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry, pp. 211–238. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wilkinson, M. 1992. Ordered versus unordered characters. Cladistics 8: 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wu, R., and Pan, Y. 1985. Preliminary observation on the cranium of Laccopithecus robustas from Lufeng, Yunnan with reference to its phylogenetic relationship. Acta Anthropol. Sin. 4: 7–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Todd C. Rae
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MammalogyAmerican Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations